Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Viemed Healthcare Inc VMD

Viemed Healthcare, Inc. through its subsidiaries, is a provider of home medical equipment (HME) and post-acute respiratory healthcare services in the United States. The Company’s service offerings are focused on effective in-home treatment with clinical practitioners providing therapy and counselling to patients in their homes using cutting edge technologies. The Company’s products and services... see more

NDAQ:VMD - Post Discussion

Viemed Healthcare Inc > Appears Apria went though a similar case? Settles $40mil
View:
Post by besttobe on May 25, 2021 7:01am

Appears Apria went though a similar case? Settles $40mil

IN BRIEF: APRIA SETTLES WITH GOV’T.

NEW YORK – The acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York has announced a $40.5 million settlement with Apria Healthcare for alleged fraudulent billing practices for non-invasive ventilators.

The lawsuit alleges, among other claims, that Apria submitted false claims to federal health programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, seeking reimbursement for the rental of non-invasive vents to beneficiaries who were not using the NIVs.

Other claims in the lawsuit: Apria improperly billed federal health programs for certain NIV rentals that were being used in a setting called PAC mode to provide bi-level pressure support therapy, which was available from a less expensive device called VPAP RAD and did not quality for reimbursement at the NIV rate; and the company improperly waived co-pays for a number of Medicare and TRICARE beneficiaries to induce them to rent NIVs.

Apria has also made “extensive factual admissions” regarding its conduct as part of the settlement, including:

  • Its RTs often did not conduct regulator visits to NIV patients to confirm that patients were using their NIVs as directed by their physicians.
  • It continued to seek payments from federal health programs for NIV rentals each month even though its RTs frequently failed to conduct in-home visits to verify that patients were still using their NIVs.
  • It often did not take steps to stop seeking payments from federal health programs or to determine if the NIV rentals were still medical necessary.

“We are pleased to have resolved this civil matter and fully cooperated throughout the review,” an Apria spokesperson said in a statement. “This settlement relates primarily to whether patients made sufficient use of NIVs, prescribed by physicians for use in patients’ homes, and was based largely on data from the early years of the company’s NIV program. Prior to becoming aware of the government’s interest in the matter in 2017, Apria had already made a number of changes to the NIV program’s processes and procedures relating to patient usage in the home. As always, our patients are our top priority and we remain committed to providing outstanding care and exceptional service.”

In addition to the settlement, Apria has entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Inspector General requiring the company to implement board oversight, a claims review process by an independent review organization and other compliance steps designed to foster adherence to federal health care program requirements and, thereby, protect the programs.

The settlement stems from a whistleblower case filed by three former Apria employees under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act.

Comment by JackLambert on May 25, 2021 7:46am
Do you mean similar or dissimilar?   There's no implication of fraud in SMG. The transactions were already audited by CMS and found to be clean.  
Comment by besttobe on May 25, 2021 7:53am
Similiar allegations as VMD, but no fraud mentioned. They threw VMD's case back to CMS. CMS did put a disclaimer on their audit, not releasing future liability. (in report) At this time the result of this are unknown. What pressure is there on CMS to act, now that the cat is out of the bag?  The market does not like uncertianty and agree with the royal Bank report, to expect volitility ...more  
Comment by JackLambert on May 25, 2021 7:59am
Ok. Good points.   But do you not think the governor of Louisiana is on the phone to the OIG this morning to understand why a rosy employment opportunity in his state is being undermined?    98% of transactions reimbursed six years ago and now being disputed?   Really?    550 jobs created.  Audit that.  
Comment by ValueCat on May 25, 2021 1:50pm
the RBC comment "while the OIG report could cause some stock price volatility, mgmt is confident...." I read the comment to mean that there could be a an initial reaction to the headline, -   - the logical inference would be that they see it as a buying opporitunity, since they expect little to come of it.  RBC also maintained rating and target. 
Comment by lscfa on May 25, 2021 8:19am
Apria stock up 65% since IPO in February.
Comment by besttobe on May 25, 2021 8:35am
RBC..."Our View: While the OIG report could cause some stock price volatility, mgmt is confident in its position and does not anticipate booking a liability." We will see I guess.