Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum VMS VENTURES INC. VMSTF

GREY:VMSTF - Post Discussion

VMS VENTURES INC. > Why the Financing? In shareholders' best interest?
View:
Post by yoda2 on May 02, 2015 2:22pm

Why the Financing? In shareholders' best interest?

It is hard to figure out why VMS went to the financial markets to raise $3million and to further dilute existing shareholders ownership (and their interest in the Reed mine and NAN) when there does not seem to be any need for money.

the April 2015 presentatation shows VMS has lots of cash ($3.8 million) and  provides no guidance on VMS's financial expenditure plans.
The most recent financial satements shows working capital of $4.5 million and no debt, other than the loan from HBM, which is to be repaid out of Reed cash flow.
So, why dilute the current shareholders' interest and raise money, for no apparent reason./?

One notes that not only were the new shares issued at the current bargain price but that the costs paid for commissions and finders fees total 12% of the $3million.  it seems expensive.

Marquest Capital Markets and Secutor Capital Management Corporation received these fees. one might wonder whether the new share funding was motivated to help these finders earn fees.

Curious, to say the least.

Comment by righand2 on May 02, 2015 5:23pm
They probably want to pay off the mine development financing HBM provided. You will note that such a repayment is a condition of doing any share issue. If it means the share price going back over 30 cents, I wouldn't complain too much.
Comment by yoda2 on May 02, 2015 11:46pm
you may be right, they may wish to pay off the 8% bridge loan,although they do not appear to have said why they raised the money and reduced our (the existing shareholders) interest in Reed and Nan. It seems difficult to follow the logic of paying 12% in commissions and fees and of diluting the interest of current shareholders in order to pay-off an 8% loan earlier than required. it will be ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities