Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Woulfe Mining Corp WFEMF

Woulfe Mining Corp is a mineral exploration company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties.

GREY:WFEMF - Post Discussion

Woulfe Mining Corp > Posco facility & prospects
View:
Post by biznotstock on Oct 10, 2012 10:23pm

Posco facility & prospects

FYI


According to a report (https://rdata.youfirst.co.kr/pdf_data/EN_HD_201209251638_00_CC11_21106403_20120925164017_21106289.pdf), POSCO just started testing in september one of the components of its future moly processing facility in Yeongwol.

Unfortunately, POSCO owns a 20% stake in a huge General Moly project (https://www.generalmoly.com/properties.php) in Mt. Hope, Nevada. So any bad news for General Moly and Mt. Hope is good news for us and our hopes of signing an offtake.

Anyhow, I think it would make sense for POSCO to sell their stake in that project and secure a source which has already been de-risked, is a few minutes away and has government backing: SMC/IMC JV. Once the JV is formed, I think we'll be sollicited.

Comment by mercurysmith on Oct 10, 2012 11:35pm
Biznotstock, all good points regarding any possible offtake with Posco. In your final sentence, you mentioned things would happen once the JV was formed. FYI, the JV is already formed, as indicated in the recent news release as follows: --(Marketwire - Sep 26, 2012) - Woulfe Mining Corp. ("Woulfe" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:WOF)(WFEMF)(OZ4.F) is pleased to announce that its ...more  
Comment by biznotstock on Oct 11, 2012 5:49am
Actually, if SMC is still 100% owned by Woulfe, then the deal has not been signed yet and the equity has not been provided either. Signing a legally binding agreement would have to be an NR...considering the significance.    
Comment by mercurysmith on Oct 11, 2012 10:34am
Biznotstock, again I agree for the most part, with one small exception.  I agree it is proof the $35M has not yet been advanced from IMC to Woulfe.  I agree that will be the most major single n/r since the offtake agreement was signed back in March.  Where I differ slightly is your definition of "legally binding agreement".  A legally binding agreement was signed ...more  
Comment by CJHallee on Oct 11, 2012 10:44am
Well put Mercury.>
Comment by biznotstock on Oct 11, 2012 12:50pm
I have no doubts that the deal will go through and I agree with your post, but I just meant that the JV (the new IMC/WOF entity) has not been formed yet because the deal had not been finalised yet. The conditions for the whole deal to be finalised have not been met yet and they cannot be unless we get financing and provide our share of the loot. We have to receive the $35M (their 25% for SMC), but ...more  
Comment by Canon123 on Oct 11, 2012 1:07pm
The most likely scenario is that the bank financing and IMC will be finalized together. IMC will want to have the security of knowing WOF is funded and the bank will want the security of knowing IMC is funding what they have said. With the 4-6 weeks for bank financing to do their DD I would expect an announcement in early November for both.
Comment by ark88 on Oct 11, 2012 1:33pm
The most likely scenario is that the bank financing and IMC will be finalized together. IMC will want to have the security of knowing WOF is funded and the bank will want the security of knowing IMC is funding what they have said.   I have to disagree. The bank is only interested in collateral and cash flow (ability to make payments). Simple as that. It's the finalization with the IMC ...more  
Comment by Canon123 on Oct 11, 2012 1:59pm
Cash flow is dependent on IMC finalizing their part of the deal, some of the Collateral is dependent on IMC finalizing their deal. While it makes the most sense to announce the deals seperately (market impact) both want the comfort of the complete deal being a "sure" thing. Anyway time will tell but if I was IMC I know I would want that comfort level of knowing WOF can fund their ...more  
Comment by ark88 on Oct 11, 2012 2:22pm
Cash flow is dependent on IMC finalizing their part of the deal, some of the Collateral is dependent on IMC finalizing their deal.   I have to disagree. The only collateral that Woulfe can provide is the sangdong mine itself or any other hard asset. The mine plant and the offtake agreement could be worth zero if tungsten prices collapse below cost of production.