Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Woulfe Mining Corp WFEMF

Woulfe Mining Corp is a mineral exploration company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties.

GREY:WFEMF - Post Discussion

Woulfe Mining Corp > Vote Against-Don't give free reign 2 Self-interested DUNDEE
View:
Post by tungstentool86 on Feb 24, 2014 9:13am

Vote Against-Don't give free reign 2 Self-interested DUNDEE

This preference share resolution at the upcoming EGM is not a resolution to support or not support the funding to be obtained through the $4m debenture. 

It is for the creation of a security that benefits Dundee only and is heavily biased against the shareholders who have supported the company by buying and not selling the stock at risk. 

Dundee in this latest action seems to think that they should be allowed to get in and enjoy the ride of future upside from their self created safety seat without paying for it. 

Just see who benefits from this... and ask yourself if the board are acting as managers of the company or as self-interested shareholders? 

I think it is even wrong that they should allowed to vote on the creation of new securities that they are the first and for the moment sole beneficary of. Surely there is a conflict of interest! Or does Ned Goodman plan to resign temporarily from the board again so that that dundee could vote in the EGM? Believe it or not this is precisely what he did! 


PLEASE INVESTIGATE and VOTE AGAINST!!
Comment by tradercarib2 on Feb 24, 2014 10:32am
Shareholders of mining comapnies have been 'fleeced' in this fashion for years! Why should be be any different? Wake up people!!! Vote against!!! db
Comment by StockExpertPro on Feb 24, 2014 10:42am
I agree! I checked with my lawyer and he basically said the same thing that you did in your post. He told me to vote against it. He said it's in the best interest of the shareholders to vote against this. Other major WOF shareholders like Korea Zinc, Colonial First State and Resinco need to vote against the preferred shares.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities