Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Woulfe Mining Corp WFEMF

Woulfe Mining Corp is a mineral exploration company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties.

GREY:WFEMF - Post Discussion

Woulfe Mining Corp > some numbers and thoughts
View:
Post by 74volfram on Jan 29, 2015 5:45pm

some numbers and thoughts

Options
Previous management: Wessons had multiple millions of low-priced options which they exercised In 2012 using a 1M+ loan from Woulfe.  That was a questionable deal but nobody objected to it because SP was going up. 
Current management and insiders: Gaucher has 5M at 10c.  All other officers have 500k at 10c. All other insiders (Dundee, KZ) have options and convertibles that exercise at higher prices (from 13c to 30c).  So all the current options are above 8c.

Almonty
All Almonty projects are brown sites. That is their specialty. But they are not nearly "played out" and have life of 9+ years.  As it is profitable, Almonty is looking for acquisitions in this down market.  They tried to acquire Ormond (a mine which was supposed to be financed last year but is still apparently lacking) and gave up on it just last month. Sangdong is a better prospect in my opinion, and it makes it an obvious target. It is bigger than Ormond and would more than triple the current production of Almonty.  It has a lot of "under water" resources that are not financially actionable at present but nonetheless exist. The mine is high-cutoff, which means it can be re-mined later at low-cutoff when tungsten prices recover. Plus the remaining not yet assessed hangingwall. The Sangdong mine life is much longer life than the very conservatively projected 12 years. Even at the estimated 75M full CAPEX (no IMC) Almonty could easily finance the current mine plan without much damage to their cash flow. This is a no-brainer for Almonty.
All financials for Almonty are on their web site (they have been public since 2011) and they have had 3 MD&A per year for the last three years.  Their site is quite good actually.

Dundee
Which all begs the question: why is Dundee letting go of all this? 
I do not buy the backroom deal theories. Dundee acting as financial advisor will not get them much more than a finder's fee from Almonty. Maybe some new options. These guys do not let anybody under their tent it seems. Why would they allow Dundee in?  It looks to me like Dundee either cannot or will not do the financing themselves.  Or they are putting up the Almonty LOI as a way to get IMC to move. 
Looking back at the company announcements, i see that in July 2014 Woulfe started paying employees and debt with shares.  Equity is the most expensive form of financing and that was a heavy hint that Dundee may not be going to support this project to the end.  They would not outright kill the project because they would be losing their entire investment, but they would be looking for alternative solutions.  And with big companies, if a corporate decision is made at the top, like to stay away from new mining projects, the policy is implemented all the way down the line without much second thinking.
Comment by GaiusGermanicus on Jan 29, 2015 6:06pm
Looks like we're SOL without the deal and at least have a chance with it, but . . . it doesn't make the pill any easier to swallow.  I imagine the difference between teh value of our issued shares and the cost basis of hte replacement can at least be taken as a long term loss immediately?  Or do we wait until the ENTIRE transaction is closed?  Seems to me in a merger all ...more  
Comment by chizzles on Jan 29, 2015 6:47pm
Volfram, that was the point that I was trying to make about the options of all of the insiders and management, they would all loose money on this transaction. I also fins it weird that Dundee would back out now. They have invested so much time (even Ned himself was once on the BOD, and now his son) and money. We are so close to finally reaching the end, seems weird to not make the finals steps to ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities