Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Woulfe Mining Corp WFEMF

Woulfe Mining Corp is a mineral exploration company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties.

GREY:WFEMF - Post Discussion

Woulfe Mining Corp > about proxy vote
View:
Post by 74volfram on Aug 19, 2015 3:06pm

about proxy vote

Absence of proxy instructions (non-vote):
From a read of the circular on proxy vote (page 6 of the voting circular):
"It is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy, in the absence of instructions to the contrary, to vote the proxy FOR the Arrangement Resolution. If a Shareholder does not specify how their Woulfe Shares are to be voted, the persons named as proxyholders will cast the votes represented by their proxy at the Meeting FOR the Arrangement Resolution." 
This is actually a NYSE legal opinion that assumes shareholders by default will support management (the resoning being that if they did not, they would have sold their shares).
The proxyholder is the broker that holds the shares for the individual shareholder.
My read is that unless the shareholder specifically instructs the proxyholder to vote differently (by voting the proxy on line or by phone), the proxyholder (broker) will vote with the management.  It is standard operating procedure in corporate voting.
Comment by kilgor on Aug 19, 2015 4:09pm
Thanks for providing this information Volfram...... now the intrigue only thickens. Why has Black instructed KSS to call shareholders regarding their vote? Why can't he wait until next week? Is he worried that the merger won't pass? Well something has got him concerned, because why would he fork out money (albeit Wof funds for now) to KSS for a futile activity? Perhaps it may be due ...more  
Comment by chrisp6712 on Aug 19, 2015 6:29pm
I don't see the intrigue. Votes had to be in Vancouver by 10:00 AM today. That means they were probably put in the mail 2 or 3 days ago. at the latest.  The agreement will pass. Maybe a few million shares if any may be voted at the meeting but the meeting will be a non-event as far as the agreement vote goes.  Once the agreement passes, real progress can be made.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities