Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum FormerXBC Inc XEBEQ

Xebec Adsorption Inc designs, engineers, and manufactures products that are used for purification, separation, dehydration, and filtration equipment for gases and compressed air. The company operates in three reportable segments: Systems, Corporate and other, and Support. Its product lines are natural gas dryers for natural gas refueling stations, compressed gas filtration, biogas purification,... see more

GREY:XEBEQ - Post Discussion

FormerXBC Inc > Agressive Growth
View:
Post by ZouZS3 on Dec 27, 2020 10:43am

Agressive Growth

This is certainly not a recommended but also 42% of my portofolio is leveraged. When I say portfolio I'm talking about all my assets (TFSA & RSP). Go big or Stay Home like newcoin said.
Comment by ZouZS3 on Dec 27, 2020 10:47am
imagine paying down debt while making big returns. I call it forced savings kind of like a mortgage, you pay it down while your property appreciates over time. And you don't need to worry about spending your available credit on non-essentials.
Comment by savyinvestor333 on Dec 27, 2020 11:02am
I wish you well. Maybe when you have time pull up a Yahoo  25 year chart for Ballard and Plug Power. We all talk about the amazing returns for these 2 stocks YFYI Ballard is currently 25% of it's all time high and Plug Power is around 3%
Comment by ZouZS3 on Dec 27, 2020 11:12am
I get it! The market might experience major crashes along the road and you probably experienced many. But I'm obviously not going to keep that same position forever! Think about it savyinvestor333 you had 100% of your portfolio in xbc 3 months ago you would have doubled. At some point, I'll sell some of my holdings to pay off all my debts and rebalance and I'll significantly reduce my ...more  
Comment by ZouZS3 on Dec 27, 2020 11:14am
I'd rather lose everything today and build my way up in the next 10 years, than losing everything in 10 years
Comment by bmo1212 on Dec 27, 2020 12:53pm
You won't loose everything in either XBC or GRN, this is not a Bre-X.
Comment by westcoast1000 on Dec 27, 2020 1:21pm
There have been a lot of valuable posts here reflecting different perspectives. bmo 1212 had a great summary. I have never understood price targets for selling. The decision depends on the alternatives you have, and the future prospects for the company you are holding.  Aribtrary price targets are for traders. Selling half and holding what people call free shares is a cognitive illusion ...more  
Comment by ZouZS3 on Dec 27, 2020 3:23pm
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I'm just wondering If "Selling half and holding free shares is a cognitive illusion" and if "what matters is your total portfolio return, not whether you are ahead or net costless on 1 stock" why would you just "trim some GRN and buy a bit more XBC" and not sell it all for XBC?!
Comment by tamaracktop on Dec 27, 2020 12:35pm
That is very true, with one caveat. While charts take stock splits into account, they don't incorporate the effects of secondary offerings. I'm sure if there were charts showing the market capitalization per share, which I've often thought there should be, the charts of Ballard and Plug would look very different. All companies would, actually and obviously.