Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Oncolytics Biotech($ONCY)


Group Portfolio

-
A group portfolio has not been created.

Oncolytics Biotech($ONCY) >  > Thanks BvB View modes: 
  • Thanks BvB

    - |
    User avatar
    (0)

    Very interesting scenario. Thanks for sharing. I just wanted to let you know that at least one other person still drops in to read this board every now and again.

    Another item in support of your thesis is Brad's comment at the last AGM that the BoD had convened a subcommittee or met to discuss the optimal time for a partnership deal.

    Now, this could mean anything. We don't know what the conclusion was. But I think that what they must have weighed is (1) the prospect of fetching a higher price given the lower risk to the partner once more results were in hand vs. (2) the inefficiency you describe well of having Oncolytics-designed pivotal trials.

    I am with you in that if the company initiates pivotal trials prior to partnering, I will begin to worry that something might be amiss here. I hope that doesn't happen.

    With best regards,

    -kaivamei


Group Administrator

PullDaTrigger