Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard Post History

by dlegovich


STACF

RE: Imo, investors should not yield to...

" Sure, some folks wish the stock price to go down for various reasons. ...

February 6, 2007

STACF

$25 million 2007 exploration program

This spells large dilution ahead. Let's see how large will be the next...

February 6, 2007

STACF

RE: Junior Miner

" What's insitu value of minerals in the moon? " Love this...

February 5, 2007

STACF

RE: CONCESSION TO JUNIOR

" Remember,regrettably, the chart IS the truth. " Well ... not...

February 5, 2007

STACF

RE: mouserman is bang on

What if Nicole Kidman falls in love with me? The stock market is no Disney...

January 25, 2007

STACF

RE: mouserman is bang on

$50 million for a 10% share? Why not $50 million for a 5% share? Or ......

January 25, 2007

STACF

RE: Few Thoughts

" [...] A strategic partner would not get shares of PAX, but rather a...

January 25, 2007

STACF

RE: My 2 Sense ... need US listing

" [...] It is totally premature from a shareholder value perspective to...

January 25, 2007

STACF

RE: Few Thoughts ... partner=dilution

Many of you do not get it: there is no difference between a private placement...

January 25, 2007

STACF

RE: very odd trading

" One scenario: [...] Scenario Two: [...] " or...

January 24, 2007

STACF

RE: Recent PAX Concerns

Norsask ... You say you like realism but you talk about a $2-$4 partnership...

January 24, 2007

STACF

RE: Recent PAX Concerns

"[...] 2. On the YZC "mistake", it needs to be realized that...

January 23, 2007

STACF

RE: comparisons

"[...] TAM - key mgmt have royalty instead of shares [...]"...

January 17, 2007

STACF

RE: Pros & Cons of the deposit

"[...] For this size of project, the best solution is to pipeline the...

January 16, 2007

STACF

RE: Dilution

As someone pointed out very clearly, dilution is dilution. It really doesn...

January 16, 2007

STACF

RE: Nightrader, why you are here?

"[...] But it's typical that when someone has an opinion that...

January 15, 2007

STACF

RE: No major blocks to $1.85

" Why do you guys always have to say that people are Pumpers if they are...

January 3, 2007

STACF

RE: No major blocks to $1.85

" Idiots....they keep on comin. " And they get angry if you...

January 2, 2007

STACF

RE: No major blocks to $1.85

" LOL....Level 2 showing all clear, all the way to $1.85. "...

January 2, 2007

STACF

RE: Zinc

" These new mini contracts are just a way for commodity traders to...

December 21, 2006

Prev 1 2 3 4 Next

Featured Company