Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard Post History

by RJ18


V.PSH

RE: the problem-rj18

I think the PP will be good the way 2guys explained it. The manipulating...

March 17, 2006

V.PSH

RE: the problem

Really now, don't you think with a PP lurking, the price isn't being...

March 17, 2006

V.PSH

RE: PSH and Texas oil production

This is the simple answer. I also believe that different products with...

March 16, 2006

V.PSH

RE: Thoughts- Longs

I tucked some away in the past and it worked for me. 20 years worth of...

March 10, 2006

V.DZR

RE: Lovely morning

Nope - didn't know about a renewed interest in Harmatten. At this point...

March 10, 2006

V.DZR

RE: news out, well cased

People ask for progress reports and complain if there are none. I will never...

March 10, 2006

V.PSH

RE: I hate to spread rumors, but ....

But who is the gopher being paid by? And does he have partners trying to...

March 9, 2006

V.PSH

RE: gas in dem dar hills

350 MCF is a tiny producer and won't do much for share price. Ours...

March 8, 2006

V.PXM

RE: dirty rumour

I would tend to doubt that rumor. There are other solutions to a partner...

March 6, 2006

V.PSH

RE: RBC is stock piling again.

Or rocky covering his shorts

March 6, 2006

V.PSH

RE: Volume maybe low but

Very true, but they're making me REAL mad.

March 1, 2006

V.PSH

RE: The vague NR

If this Yegua sands thing targeting 40 feet of pay out of a 91 foot zone for...

March 1, 2006

V.PSH

RE: The vague NR

"Logs indicate four potential pay zones totaling 91 feet of gross sands...

March 1, 2006

V.CWQ

RE: Insider buying of CWQ's Fosterton partner

And what if it is bigger than anticipated? (We can always hope)

March 1, 2006

V.PSH

RE: What Vague NR???

Accurate is more important that fast.

March 1, 2006

V.PSH

RE: The vague NR

That might be true for regulars on this board, but new investors aren't...

March 1, 2006

V.DZR

RE: Sharon's Q3 report info.

Algrove said 1mm not 7mm: "Allen ranch #2 well = 7.1 mmcfd potential...

March 1, 2006

V.PSH

RE: The vague NR

You have to wonder what is going on. The latest NR is still not in the US...

March 1, 2006

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse