Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Revealed: the next blockbuster takeover candidate

Keith Schaefer
0 Comments| April 21, 2010

{{labelSign}}  Favorites
{{errorMessage}}

There have been billions of dollars in takeovers in the US oilpatch recently, with the most active area by far being the Gulf of Mexico. Apache Corp (NYSE: APA, Stock Forum) made two acquisitions – buying some offshore properties from Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN, Stock Forum) for $1 billion, and then spending $3.9 billion for Mariner Energy (NYSE: ME, Stock Forum) the next week.

One of the largest independents in the Gulf is ATP Oil & Gas (NASDAQ:ATPG, Stock Forum), and with its 200 million barrels in reserves, growing production and a new flexible debt facility – no significant repayments until 2015 –the company is well positioned for a major or large intermediate looking for a five year growth engine.

And of course, the question is, if ATP were to get bought out, what kind of price could investors expect? Mariner and ATP are similar enough – both having close to a 50/50 oil-gas mix with oil in the Gulf of Mexico and natural gas assets elsewhere – that a rough valuation comparison is possible.

ATP’s new PowerPoint presentation shows an 2010 exit rate –the number of barrels per day it will be producing on December 31 2010 – of 48,000 bopd (barrels of oil per day production). It is giving guidance of 7000 bopd on each of the four wells it expects to bring onstream at its Telemark hub in the Gulf of Mexico this year – which I would suggest is at the low end.

(However, management was disconcertingly vague on the actual production of the first one that just was put into production, the AT63 well. Nor do we know the terms of the new $1.5 billion debt facility.)

It’s good for this team to keep expectations low as they have missed guidance in each of the last quarter, and could miss again when they report Q1.

Analysts put the Mariner purchase in the range of $60,000 per flowing barrel (which means that if you multiply the barrels per day production of the company by $60,000, that will equal the sum total of the market cap of the company plus its debt – called the Enterprise Value – which is the price an acquiring company pays).
So if I want to guess at what I think a fair value for ATP might be at year end, here are a couple ideas: I would use (minimum) $65,000 per flowing barrel, as ATP has a higher oil weighting (65% oil at year end, vs 65% gas for Mariner), and therefore its cash flow would be greater per barrel and deserves a higher price.

Now multiply that by 48,000 bopd of year end production, which equals $3.12 billion. That is what I believe an acquiring company would pay. Now to determine what share price that works out to, subtract the $1.5 billion of debt that ATP has, to get $1.62 billion.

Divide that by the roughly 50 million shares to get a per share valuation of $32.40. An exit rate in 2011 of 65,000 bopd equals $54.50 a share. That does not take into account any of the $2 billion in infrastructure the company has between its 3 hubs (which is one of those huge offshore oil platforms) – Gomez, Telemark and the still being built Octabuoy, which will be deployed in the North Sea.

I find it odd that very low producing rates but long life onshore production gets valued significantly higher than Gulf of Mexico (GOM) production, but the annual threat of hurricanes, high capital costs and usually short life reserves combine to drive valuations lower.

Another metric is Net Asset Value. Many producers trade at or near their NAV, but in their PowerPoint management shows a current enterprise value (market cap + debt) of $2.1 billion and an NAV of over $7 billion, for a very cheap 30% of NAV.

DISCLOSURE – I own 1000 shares of ATPG.

About Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin

Keith Schaefer, Editor and Publisher of Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin, writes on oil and natural gas markets - and stocks - in a simple, easy to read manner. He uses research reports and trade magazines, interviews industry experts and executives to identify trends in the oil and gas industry - and writes about them in a public blog. He then finds investments that make money based on that information. Company information is shared only with Oil & Gas Investments subscribers in the Bulletin - they see what he’s buying, when he buys it, and why.

The Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin subscription service finds, researches and profiles growing oil and gas companies. The Oil and Gas Investments Bulletin is a completely independent service, written to build subscriber loyalty. Companies do not pay in any way to be profiled. For more information about the Bulletin or to subscribe, please visit: www.oilandgas-investments.com.

Legal Disclaimer: Under no circumstances should any Oil and Gas Investments Bulletin material be construed as an offering of securities or investment advice. Readers should consult with his/her professional investment advisor regarding investments in securities referred to herein. It is our opinion that junior public oil and gas companies should be evaluated as speculative investments. The companies on which we focus are typically smaller, early stage, oil and gas producers. Such companies by nature carry a high level of risk. Keith Schaefer is not a registered investment dealer or advisor. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned, or the giving of investment advice. Oil and Gas Investments is a commercial enterprise whose revenue is solely derived from subscription fees. It has been designed to serve as a research portal for subscribers, who must rely on themselves or their investment advisors in determining the suitability of any investment decisions they wish to make. Keith Schaefer does not receive fees directly or indirectly in connection with any comments or opinions expressed in his reports. He bases his investment decisions based on his research, and will state in each instance the shares held by him in each company. The copyright in all material on this site is held or used by permission by us. The contents of this site are provided for informational purposes only and may not, in any form or by any means, be copied or reproduced, summarized, distributed, modified, transmitted, revised or commercially exploited without our prior written permission.

© 2009, Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin

Contact Us:
Email: nichola@oilandgas-investments.com
Customer Service: 1-877-844-8606
www.oilandgas-investments.com



{{labelSign}}  Favorites
{{errorMessage}}

Featured Company