Top Bullboards post:
“How could we as shareholders (or GBK as mgmt) quantify what an acceptable offer would be in the absence of an updated 43-101 resource calc on JCML/CRI (prefeasibility from 2007 lacks 2008, 2009, and 2010 exploration seasons) also missing is GBK's 2010 season (i.e. major resource expansion on 50% lands), and in the absence of an updated CRI feasibility study that was an agreed part of the JCML shareholder agreement? Further, why would we accept a discounted offer geared at a diluted rate of 4.21% when we all know we should have a 25% carried interest per the shareholder agreement and arbitration panel? And why now, in the 11th hour, knowing that Appellate Justice Punnet has been reviewing the volumes of oppression and breach for over a month? I would think that there would be no advantage in tendering at this time given the renewed bid, and knowing that the BC Supreme Court rulings, orders and awards are upon us. It seems we as GBK shareholders are firmly in the driver's seat going forward.” From ColonelPike on the Goldbrook Ventures (TSX: V.GBK, Stock Forum) board.
Top Bullboard:
CardioComm Solutions (TSX: V.EKG, Stock Forum) gathered the second-most posts.
Top blog:
balraj_rakhra presents an article that asserts this molybdenum junior has a bright future in the Investment Ideas blog.