1032% of Production Replaced by Glacier Reserves Additions at an all-in
F&D cost of $4.41/boe ($0.73 mcf)
(TSX: AAV, NYSE: AAV)
CALGARY, March 13, 2013 /CNW/ - Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. ("Advantage" or the "Corporation") is pleased
to announce the December 31, 2012 reserves for our Montney resource
property at Glacier, Alberta ("Glacier") (see page 5 "Independent
Reserve Evaluator").
Glacier 2012 Reserve Highlights
-
Advantage's 2012 Glacier capital program replaced 1032% of Glacier 2012
production. Our 2012 and three year Finding & Development ("F&D") costs
including the change in Future Development Capital ("FDC") are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Years Ended 2012
|
2P F&D including change in FDC
|
|
|
|
|
|
$4.41/boe or $0.73/mcf
|
|
|
|
|
|
$6.34/boe or $1.06/mcf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
The recycle ratio associated with our F&D costs based on Sproule's
forecast of 2013 operating netbacks at Glacier are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$/mcf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (based on AECO price of $3.31/mmbtu)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties (at 5.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.33)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sproule 2013 Glacier operating netback
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycle Ratio for 2012 ($2.60/$0.73)
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycle Ratio for the three years ended 2012 ($2.60/$1.06)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Our three year all-in Finding and Development cost of $1.06/mcf combined
with our 2.5x Recycle Ratio, (which is based on a $3.31/mmbtu AECO gas
price) demonstrates the solid economics of our Glacier property. These
results are primarily based on the development of high heat content gas
in the Upper and Lower Montney which are proving to be economic even at
current gas pricing.
-
The Middle Montney is demonstrating its economic viability due to the
significant increase in test rates on recent well completions and the
high liquids yields associated with this interval.
-
We are currently working on a two year development plan that will focus
on doubling production throughput at Glacier to 200 mmcf/d by early
2015. This program will be designed to further the delineation of the
Middle and Lower intervals in order to increase reserves on the
property.
-
Glacier's proven and probable ("2P") reserves increased by 28% to 1.41
Tcfe (235.5 mmboe). Proven reserves increased by 26% to 0.89 Tcfe and
now represent 63% of Glacier 2P reserves.
-
Technical revisions accounted for 48% of the 2P reserve additions in
2012. These revisions, which did not require any increase in future
development capital, can be attributed to drilling results during 2012
and improved production performance from older producing wells. Future
development capital included in the Glacier 2012 2P reserve report is
$1.54 billion compared to $1.41 billion in the 2011. Sproule is
forecasting production throughput to grow to 200 mmcf/d by early 2015
at Glacier and have included estimates of capital required for plant
upgrades and a shallow cut liquids extraction plant.
-
The Net Present Value of the Sproule 2P Glacier reserves increased by
20% over 2011 to $1.41 billion as at December 31, 2012 (at a 10%
discount factor on a pre-tax basis). This occurred in spite of a
reduction in the natural gas price forecast which averaged 6% lower
during the first five years of the Sproule Report as compared to the
initial five year period in the 2011 report.
Background - Advantage 2012 Technical Studies & Evaluation at Glacier
Over the course of 2012, Advantage conducted a series of studies and
analysis of the Montney formation designed to enhance our geological
understanding of the rock properties of all the identified reservoir
intervals at Glacier. This work consisted of the following components:
i)
|
|
|
Core Study - this work included obtaining and analyzing additional core samples in
several stratigraphic units within the Montney at Glacier and
incorporating external core data from other areas in the Montney
fairway. The data was compared to our existing well logs and then
utilized to better define the mineralogy which was incorporated into
updating and refining our reservoir characterization and petrophysical
models of the Montney formation. The findings of this study were
critical in supporting the Completion Study.
|
ii)
|
|
|
Completion Study - this study included a comprehensive review of completion design and
fracture stimulation techniques which included the evaluation of 135
wells and approximately 1,500 fracs within the Montney fairway. The
work involved a comparison of mechanical stimulation tools, frac fluid
types (poly-CO2, slickwater, binary, hydrocarbon), frac size, pumping
rates and initial and long term production behavior. External
completion specialists who are familiar with recent frac techniques
utilized in both Canada and the US were also consulted to review our
data and enhance our understanding of the results.
|
|
|
|
|
Study Results
The results of our Core Study reinforced our earlier views that greater
than 250 meters of Montney reservoir at Glacier is gas charged with
average effective porosities of approximately 5% in the Upper and Lower
Montney and between 3% to 3.5% in the liquids rich Middle Montney
interval.
Our Completion Study determined that initial production rates and
reserves can be significantly enhanced by utilizing a variety of
alternative fracture stimulation techniques based upon the specific
reservoir properties of each interval. In particular, our completion
designs for the Middle and Lower Montney were altered substantially to
take into account the unique rock characteristics of these horizons.
These changes in frac design resulted in a significant increase in
average production test rates on wells completed with the new
techniques.
Middle Montney - 337% Increase in Well Test Rates with High Liquids
Yields
The Middle Montney formation is approximately 150 meters thick and is
present across our entire land block as confirmed by vertical well
control at Glacier and vertical wells that offset our acreage. In 2011,
we completed and tested three existing vertical wells in the Middle
Montney and demonstrated that the formation is a liquids rich
over-pressured, reservoir.
Prior to completion of our 2012 Core and Completion Studies, Advantage
completed four horizontal wells in the Middle Montney which included
the 9-9-76-12W6 well. This well was drilled into an interval that
produced the highest liquids yield of all four wells and had an initial
test rate of 1.8 mmcf/d at a flowing pressure of 3.1 mpa after 99 hours
of flow.
During the winter of 2012, we drilled three additional horizontal wells
in the same interval as the 9-9-76-12W6 well. These three wells were
strategically located in different corners of our land block in order
to delineate this interval across our property. New completion
techniques were employed on these wells that were specifically designed
for this interval based on our 2012 Core and Completion Studies. The
results of these wells are shown in the table below:
|
Hz Well
Location
|
Final
Test Rate
(mmcf/d)
|
Flow
Pressure
(mpa)
|
Flow
Hours
|
New Wells
|
02/1-16-76-13W6
|
3.7
|
3.3
|
120
|
|
7-7-77-13W6
|
7.5
|
8.6
|
85
|
|
13-29-76-12W6
|
7.3
|
7.9
|
72
|
|
Average
|
6.2
|
6.6
|
|
The average test rate of these three new wells was 337% higher than the
initial 9-9-76-12W6 well. These new wells also confirmed that the
liquids content of this interval is consistent across the land block.
On average, Sproule assigned a C3+ liquids yield of 42 bbls/mmcf to
this interval.
Lower Montney - 327% Increase in Well Test Rates
In late 2012, two lower Montney wells were also completed with
specifically designed completion techniques based on our 2012 Core and
Completion Studies. These wells demonstrated a 327% increase when
compared to the average test rates of three immediately offsetting
Lower Montney horizontal wells that were completed in 2010 and 2011
using our conventional frac design. In addition, the average flowing
pressure of the two new wells increased by 202% over the initial three
wells. The comparative results are as follows:
|
Hz Well
Location
|
Final
Test Rate
(mmcf/d)
|
Flow
Pressure
(mpa)
|
Flow
Hours
|
Old Wells
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/16-7-76-13W6
|
4.6
|
6.3
|
45
|
|
16-6-76-13W6
|
4.2
|
3.4
|
49
|
|
02/1-6-76-13W6
|
3.6
|
3.7
|
87
|
|
Average
|
4.2
|
4.5
|
|
New Wells
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-7-76-13W6
|
14.6
|
10.0
|
109
|
|
7-7-76-13W6
|
12.5
|
8.2
|
66
|
|
Average
|
13.6
|
9.1
|
|
The 10-7-76-13W6 was recently brought on production at a restricted rate
of 13.2 mmcf/d at 11.3 mpa and the 7-7-76-13W6 will be brought on
production shortly. Production rates are being restricted to avoid
sand erosion of our surface facilities and to avoid plant upsets due to
the very strong productivity of these wells.
Upper Montney
The Upper Montney wells at Glacier continue to demonstrate solid long
term production performance which has been recognized by Sproule in
their 2012 report. Our oldest Upper Montney wells have over four years
of production history and estimates of ultimate recoverable reserves
per well have increased each year.
A total of 15 Upper Montney wells were carried forward from our Phase IV
program at the beginning of 2012. Our previous completion design will
be utilized on nine of these Upper Montney wells. Six of these nine
wells have been completed with average test rates of 7.3 mmcf/d at 6.0
mpa and are consistent with previous results. The remaining six Upper
Montney wells are in the process of being completed with modified frac
designs and the results will be available after spring break-up.
Glacier - Future Undeveloped Locations
The following table sets out detailed information contained in the
Sproule Report broken out for each of the main intervals in the Glacier
Montney formation:
|
# of Gross Hz Wells
|
2P Recovery per Well
|
Average Pay
Thickness
(meters)
|
% of Total Acreage
with Reserves
Assigned
|
|
Developed
|
Undeveloped
|
Developed
(bcf/well)
|
Undeveloped
(bcf/well)
|
Upper
|
73
|
174
|
4.3
|
4.7
|
50
|
77.8%
|
Middle
|
7
|
15
|
3.4
|
4.2
|
150
|
2.2%
|
Lower
|
15
|
77
|
3.7
|
5.0
|
50
|
27.6%
|
Total
|
95
|
266
|
|
|
250
|
21.9%
|
To date Sproule has assigned reserves to only 21.9% of the total Montney
formation at Glacier.
The Middle Montney formation has reserves assigned to only 2.2% of our
acreage with an average undeveloped 2P Recovery per well of 4.2
bcf/well. This includes approximately 42 bbls/mmcf of natural gas
liquids for each well which significantly enhances the value of this
horizon. Further drilling is required to delineate the Middle Montney
both aerially and vertically with the potential for up to 1,000 wells
across the entire land block.
Reserve assignments in the Lower Montney have improved substantially in
2012 due to improvements in our frac design combined with stable
production profiles from our existing wells. The Lower Montney is
present over our entire land block and is confirmed by vertical well
control at Glacier and vertical and horizontal wells that offset our
land block. However, only 29.4% of our Lower Montney acreage has
reserves assigned which leaves significant potential for future growth
with additional delineation and development drilling.
Looking Forward
-
Glacier continues to exceed our expectations in terms of well
performance and economic efficiencies due to its superior cost
structure which is among the lowest in North America. Sproule's 2012
Glacier reserves report provides further confirmation of the quality of
our asset and demonstrates the economic growth potential and
scalability of this property even in the current low gas price
environment.
-
Our focus in 2012 which consisted of conducting comprehensive studies of
well cores and alternative completion techniques in the Montney
formation significantly enhanced our understanding of the complex
geology at Glacier.
-
The results were pivotal in re-designing our completion techniques which
resulted in test rates increasing by 337% in the Middle Montney and
327% in the Lower Montney. This led to higher reserve assignments in
these intervals in the Glacier year-end reserve report.
-
Our three year all-in 2P Finding and Development cost of $1.06/mcf
combined with our 2.5x Recycle Ratio, (which is based on a $3.31/mmbtu
AECO gas price) demonstrates the solid economics of our Glacier
property. These results are primarily based on the development of high
heat content gas in the Upper and Lower Montney which are proving to be
economic even at current gas pricing.
-
The Middle Montney is demonstrating its economic viability due to the
significant increase in test rates on recent well completions and the
high liquids yields associated with this interval.
-
We are currently working on a two year development plan that will focus
on doubling production throughput at Glacier to 200 mmcf/d by early
2015. This program will be designed to further the delineation of the
Middle and Lower intervals in order to increase reserves on the
property.
Independent Reserve Evaluator
-
Sproule Associates Ltd. ("Sproule") was engaged as an independent
qualified reserve evaluator to evaluate the Corporation's year-end
reserves as of December 31, 2012 in accordance with National Instrument
51-101 ("NI 51-101") and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook
("COGE Handbook"). Reserves are stated on a gross working interest
basis unless otherwise indicated. All references to year end 2012
financial and operating data are estimates and are unaudited.
-
Advantage's year-end 2012 corporate reserves will be included with our
year-end financial and operating information which is scheduled to be
released on March 26, 2013.
Appendix A - Glacier Reserve Summary
Advantage engaged our independent qualified reserves evaluator Sproule
Associates Ltd. ("Sproule") to update the reserves analysis for the
Company in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 and the COGE
Handbook. The following tables incorporate only the reserves assigned
to the Corporation's property at Glacier, Alberta. The estimates of
reserves and future net revenue for the Glacier property may not
reflect the same confidence level as estimates or reserves and future
net revenue for all properties due to the effects of aggregation.
Reserves and production information included herein is stated on a gross
working interest basis (before royalty burdens and including royalty
interests receivable) unless noted otherwise. This summary contains
several cautionary statements that are specifically required by NI
51-101. In addition to the detailed information disclosed in this press
release, more detailed information about all of the Corporation's
reserve on a net interest basis (after royalty burdens and including
royalty interests) and on a gross interest basis (before royalty
burdens and excluding royalty interests) will be included in
Advantage's Annual Information Form ("AIF") and will be available at www.advantageog.com and www.sedar.com in the coming weeks.
|
Glacier Gross Working Interest Reserves (Working Interest only)
|
Summary as at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
Natural
Gas Liquids
(mbbl)
|
|
Natural Gas
(mmcf)
|
|
Equivalent
(mboe)
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed Producing
|
|
-
|
|
177,020
|
|
29,503
|
Developed Non-producing
|
|
147
|
|
23,169
|
|
4,009
|
Undeveloped
|
|
1,629
|
|
676,092
|
|
114,311
|
Total Proved
|
|
1,776
|
|
876,281
|
|
147,823
|
Probable
|
|
861
|
|
520,690
|
|
87,643
|
Total Proved + Probable
|
|
2,637
|
|
1,396,971
|
|
235,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glacier Present Value of Future Net Revenue using Sproule price and cost
forecasts (1)(2)
|
($000)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Before Income Taxes Discounted at
10%
|
|
15%
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed Producing
|
|
$644,357
|
|
$351,202
|
|
$290,241
|
Developed Non-producing
|
|
89,286
|
|
53,590
|
|
44,783
|
Undeveloped
|
|
1,969,132
|
|
471,237
|
|
237,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Proved
|
|
2,702,775
|
|
876,029
|
|
572,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
2,619,965
|
|
540,728
|
|
325,730
|
Total Proved + Probable
|
|
$5,322,740
|
|
$1,416,757
|
|
$898,648
|
(1)
|
|
|
Advantage's crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquid reserves were
evaluated using Sproule's
product price forecast effective December 31, 2012 prior to the
provision for income taxes, interests,
debt services charges and general and administrative expenses. It should
not be assumed that the
discounted future revenue estimated by Sproule represents the fair
market value of the reserves.
|
(2)
|
|
|
Assumes that development of Glacier will occur, without regard to the
likely availability to the
Company of funding required for that development.
|
|
|
|
|
Sproule Price Forecasts
The present value of future net revenue at December 31, 2012 was based
upon natural gas and natural gas liquids pricing assumptions prepared
by Sproule effective December 31, 2012. These forecasts are adjusted
for reserve quality, transportation charges and the provision of any
applicable sales contracts. The price assumptions used over the next
seven years are summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Alberta AECO-C
Natural Gas
($Cdn/mmbtu)
|
|
Henry Hub
Natural Gas
($US/mmbtu)
|
|
Edmonton
Propane
($Cdn/bbl)
|
|
Edmonton
Butane
($Cdn/bbl)
|
|
Edmonton
Pentanes
($Cdn/bbl)
|
|
Exchange
Plus Rate
($US/$Cdn)
|
2013
|
|
3.31
|
|
3.65
|
|
47.15
|
|
63.02
|
|
90.53
|
|
1.001
|
2014
|
|
3.72
|
|
4.06
|
|
50.22
|
|
66.96
|
|
96.19
|
|
1.001
|
2015
|
|
3.91
|
|
4.24
|
|
49.45
|
|
65.74
|
|
94.44
|
|
1.001
|
2016
|
|
4.70
|
|
5.04
|
|
53.82
|
|
71.13
|
|
102.18
|
|
1.001
|
2017
|
|
5.32
|
|
5.66
|
|
54.97
|
|
72.20
|
|
103.71
|
|
1.001
|
2018
|
|
5.40
|
|
5.74
|
|
55.74
|
|
73.28
|
|
105.27
|
|
1.001
|
2019
|
|
5.49
|
|
5.83
|
|
56.52
|
|
74.38
|
|
106.85
|
|
1.001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glacier Gross Working Interest Reserves Reconciliation
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
Natural Gas
Liquids
(mbbl)
|
Natural
Gas
(mmcf)
|
Oil
Equivalent
(mboe)
|
Opening balance Dec. 31, 2011
|
-
|
701,364
|
116,894
|
Extensions
|
1,629
|
49,951
|
9,954
|
Improved recovery
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Infill Drilling
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Discoveries
|
147
|
8,161
|
1,507
|
Economic factors
|
-
|
(79)
|
(13)
|
Technical revisions
|
-
|
150,227
|
25,038
|
Acquisitions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Dispositions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Production
|
-
|
(33,343)
|
(5,557)
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance at Dec. 31, 2012
|
1,776
|
876,281
|
147,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved + Probable
|
Natural Gas
Liquids
(mbbl)
|
Natural
Gas
(mmcf)
|
Oil
Equivalent
(mboe)
|
Opening balance Dec. 31, 2011
|
-
|
1,102,466
|
183,744
|
Extensions
|
2,214
|
71,790
|
14,179
|
Improved recovery
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Infill Drilling
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Discoveries
|
423
|
14,712
|
2,875
|
Economic factors
|
-
|
(92)
|
(15)
|
Technical revisions
|
-
|
163,678
|
27,280
|
Acquisitions
|
-
|
77,760
|
12,960
|
Dispositions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Production
|
-
|
(33,343)
|
(5,557)
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance at Dec. 31, 2012
|
2,637
|
1,396,971
|
235,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glacier Finding, Development & Acquisitions Costs ("FD&A") (1)(2)(3)
|
2012 FD&A Costs - Gross Working Interest Reserves excluding Future
Development Capital
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
Proved + Probable
|
Capital expenditures ($000)
|
$119,164
|
$119,164
|
Acquisitions net of dispositions ($000)(4)
|
-
|
-
|
Total capital ($000)
|
$119,164
|
$119,164
|
|
|
|
Total mboe, end of year
|
147,823
|
235,465
|
Total mboe, beginning of year
|
116,894
|
183,744
|
Production, mboe
|
5,557
|
5,557
|
Reserve additions, mboe
|
36,486
|
57,278
|
|
|
|
2012 FD&A costs ($/boe)
|
$3.27
|
$2.08
|
2011 FD&A costs ($/boe)
|
$6.93
|
$8.32
|
Three year average FD&A costs ($/boe)
|
$4.45
|
$4.48
|
2012 F&D costs ($/boe)
|
$3.27
|
$2.08
|
2011 F&D costs ($/boe)
|
$6.93
|
$8.32
|
Three year average F&D costs ($/boe)
|
$4.45
|
$4.48
|
|
|
|
NI 51-101
|
2012 FD&A Costs - Gross Working Interest Reserves including Future
Development Capital
|
|
Proved
|
Proved + Probable
|
Capital expenditures ($000)
|
$119,164
|
$119,164
|
Acquisitions net of dispositions ($000)(4)
|
-
|
-
|
Net change in Future Development Capital ($000)
|
131,967
|
133,188
|
Total capital ($000)
|
$251,131
|
$252,352
|
Reserve additions, mboe
|
36,486
|
54,278
|
|
|
|
2012 FD&A costs ($/boe)
|
$6.88
|
$4.41
|
2011 FD&A costs ($/boe)
|
$9.24
|
$7.41
|
Three year average FD&A costs ($/boe)
|
$9.30
|
$6.34
|
2012 F&D costs ($/boe)
|
$6.88
|
$4.41
|
2011 F&D costs ($/boe)
|
$9.24
|
$7.41
|
Three year average F&D costs ($/boe)
|
$9.30
|
$6.34
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Under NI 51-101, the methodology to be used to calculate FD&A costs
includes incorporating changes
in future development capital ("FDC") required to bring the proved
undeveloped and probable reserves
to production. For continuity, Advantage has presented herein FD&A costs
calculated both excluding
and including FDC.
|
(2)
|
The aggregate of the exploration and development costs incurred in the
most recent financial year and
the change during that year in estimated future development costs
generally will not reflect total finding
and development costs related to reserves additions for that year.
Changes in forecast FDC occur
annually as a result of development activities, acquisition and
disposition activities and capital cost
estimates that reflect Sproule's best estimate of what it will cost to
bring the proved undeveloped and
probable reserves on production.
|
(3)
|
In all cases, the FD&A number is calculated by dividing the identified
capital expenditures by the applicable
reserve additions. Boes may be misleading, particularly if used in
isolation. A boe conversion ratio of
6 MCF:1 BBL is based on an energy equivalency conversion method
primarily applicable at the burner tip
and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that
the value ratio based on the current
price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different
from the energy equivalency of 6:1,
utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication
of value.
|
(4)
|
2012 acquisitions at Glacier consisted of a transaction where lands with
no reserves assigned at the end
of 2011 were exchanged for lands where Sproule assigned probable
reserves at the end of 2012
|
|
Advisory
The information in this press release contains certain forward-looking
statements, including within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to
future events or our future intentions or performance. All statements
other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements are often, but not always,
identified by the use of words such as "seek", "anticipate", "plan",
"continue", "estimate", "demonstrate", "expect", "may", "will",
"project", "predict", "potential", "targeting", "intend", "could",
"might", "should", "believe", "would" and similar expressions and
include statements relating to, among other things management's intent
to focus on doubling production throughput at Glacier, expectation that
the Glacier Development plan will be designed to further delineate the
Middle and Lower Glacier intervals to increase reserves, future
development capital associated with the reserves on the Glacier
property, management's belief that the Glacier property demonstrates
economic growth potential and scalability despite low gas price
environment, expected plans and timing of drilling and completion of
wells, expected increases and rates of production, expected plans to
expand facilities and projections with respect to individual wells,
regions, properties or projects. These statements involve substantial
known and unknown risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond
Advantage's control, including: the impact of general economic
conditions; industry conditions; changes in laws and regulations
including the adoption of new environmental laws and regulations and
changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; fluctuations in
commodity prices and foreign exchange and interest rates; stock market
volatility and market valuations; volatility in market prices for oil
and natural gas; liabilities inherent in oil and natural gas
operations; uncertainties associated with estimating oil and natural
gas reserves; competition for, among other things, capital,
acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel;
incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; changes in income
tax laws or changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the
oil and gas industry and income trusts; geological, technical, drilling
and processing problems and other difficulties in producing petroleum
reserves; and obtaining required approvals of regulatory authorities.
Advantage's actual decisions, activities, results, performance or
achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied
by, such forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurances can
be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking
statements will transpire or occur or, if any of them do, what benefits
that Advantage will derive from them. Except as required by law,
Advantage undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements. For additional risk factors in respect of
Advantage and its business, please refer to its Annual Information Form
dated March 23, 2012 which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and www.advantageog.com.
References in this press release to initial test production rates are
useful in confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however such rates
are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will commence
production and decline thereafter. Such rates are not necessarily
indicative of long term performance or of ultimate recovery. While
encouraging, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates
in calculating the aggregate production for Advantage.
Barrels of oil equivalent (boe) may be misleading, particularly if used
in isolation. A boe conversion ratio has been calculated using a
conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one
barrel. "Tcf" stands for trillion cubic feet of natural gas and "bcf"
stands for billion cubic feet of natural gas. Such conversion rates are
based on an energy equivalency conversion method application at the
burner tip and do not represent an economic value equivalency at the
wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of
crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from
the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis
may be misleading as an indication of value.
The Corporation discloses several financial measures that do not have
any standardized meaning prescribed under GAAP. These financial
measures include operating netbacks. Management believes that these
financial measures are useful supplemental information to analyze
operating performance and provide an indication of the results
generated by the Corporation's principal business activities prior to
the consideration of how those activities are financed or how the
results are taxed. Investors should be cautioned that these measures
should not be construed as an alternative other measures of financial
performance as determined in accordance with GAAP. Details of how
operating netbacks are calculated are included havein Advantage's
method of calculating these measures may differ from other companies,
and accordingly, they may not be comparable to similar measures used by
other companies.
Where any disclosure of reserves data is made in this press release that
does not reflect all reserves of Advantage, the reader should note that
the estimates of reserves and future net revenue for individual
properties or groups of properties may not reflect the same confidence
level as estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all
properties, due to the effects of aggregation.
SOURCE: Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd.