Hess Corporation (NYSE: HES) (“Hess” or “the Company”) today sent a
letter to all shareholders in connection with its 2013 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, to be held on May 16, 2013.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of Hess’
highly qualified independent nominees on the WHITE
proxy card.
For information about Hess’ transformation and the 2013 Annual Meeting,
please visit: www.transforminghess.com.
Included below is the full text of the letter to Hess shareholders:
Dear Fellow Shareholder,
As you are aware, the hedge fund Elliott Management is seeking to
install five of its nominees on the Hess board. They launched this
divisive proxy contest without making any attempt to meet with Hess
management, instead they are trying to mislead Hess shareholders by
pursuing multiple attacks based on an array of distorted statistics.
Why does Elliott continue to push its aggressive campaign? We would like
to pose a few questions for our shareholders.
Hess’ strategy is working. Why is Elliott trying to change it?
Elliott launched its campaign to effect a breakup plan that they have
touted as the best strategy to “unlock” shareholder value. This flawed
agenda has been roundly rejected by nearly every research analyst
covering Hess, while the Hess transformation strategy has been widely
applauded by those same analysts, with our stock outperforming our proxy
peers on a total return basis by approximately 32% since January 1, 2013
(see research analyst commentary below). Further, based on recent
conversations with shareholders, the superiority of Hess’ plan is beyond
debate.
However, Elliott continues to pursue its flawed strategy, even though it
has no experience running a large E&P company. This is a hedge fund that
is well-known for its bare-knuckled approach and determined pursuit of
its objectives, no matter how flawed. We caution Hess shareholders
against putting the value of their investment at risk by supporting a
hedge fund determined to replace Hess’ strategy with one that has been
rejected.
Does Elliott really believe that its directors are independent?
In order to obtain nominees for its slate, Elliott was forced to be
creative. It enticed its nominees by promising to separately pay them
large bonuses based on short-term stock price appreciation, encouraging
them to take excessive risks to achieve substantial payouts. In fact,
these directors have already “earned” $750,000 each from Elliott under
this pay scheme based solely on the success of Hess’ outstanding
execution.
These nominees will be paid directly by Elliott while serving on the
Hess Board, in amounts far greater than their compensation as Hess
directors. Putting aside the basic corporate governance principles that
this scheme violates (as discussed in the article “Are Shareholder
Bonuses Incentives or Bribes” http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/04/25/are-shareholder-bonuses-incentives-or-bribes/),
these payments raise the questions: to whom
will these directors answer to and where are their loyalties, to Elliott
or Hess shareholders?
Why does Elliott continue to cherry-pick data to obscure Hess’ strong
results?
Perhaps feeling the pressure of criticism from those who understand the
E&P business, Elliott has tried to distract attention from their plan by
using manipulated statistics to attack Hess’ performance, including
ending most of their stock price charts to avoid capturing the price
appreciation driven by the successful execution of our transformation
strategy.
We recognize that, depending on the period you select and the companies
you compare yourself to, we are not the top performer on every metric
during every period. However, here are the “unadjusted” facts regarding
our performance:
-
Since 1995, Hess has returned nearly 400%,
outperforming the S&P 500 by 68%
-
Over the past decade, while Hess operated as an integrated company, it
outperformed its integrated proxy peers by nearly 200%
-
Since July 25, 2012, when Hess provided the market with an update on
its transformation to a pure play E&P, Hess stock has increased 57%,
as compared to a 10% gain for our peer
group
Why is Elliott trying to take credit for Hess’ recent stock price
appreciation?
While Elliott will have you believe otherwise, much of the increase in
Hess’ stock price occurred following the announcement of its
transformation and prior to the date
Elliott made itself known to Hess and its shareholders. The many
successful divestitures Hess has executed were initiated long
before Elliott pursued its stealth accumulation at Hess. Elliott
may try to take credit for all of the positive developments at Hess, but
the facts don’t support their case. In fact, if Elliott had its way,
Hess would be pursuing a flawed breakup scheme that the vast majority of
knowledgeable observers believe would destroy value.
What about Elliott’s arguments that its directors would provide
better oversight of the execution of Hess’ strategy?
Elliott, possibly realizing that their plan has not gained any traction,
is now trying to argue that their captive nominees would help ensure
better execution of Hess’ plan. If Hess shareholders want great
execution, the Elliott directors are the wrong choice.
-
Elliott’s nominees are being directly compensated by Elliott to
pursue a short term agenda. By accepting this payment scheme,
these directors have a paymaster that has substantial sway over their
behavior. Directors that are structurally motivated to advance a
strategy that is in conflict with Hess’ strategy are likely to
undermine execution, not advance it. ALL
of Elliott’s nominees have agreed to this scheme; NONE
are suited to serve on the Hess Board.
-
Elliott’s nominees were not able to determine that Elliott’s
breakup plan was flawed. Research analysts and nearly all of the
shareholders that Hess has spoken with have concluded that Elliott’s
plan is fundamentally flawed. How come Elliott’s nominees couldn’t
also make this determination – or is the pay scheme clouding their
judgment?
-
Hess’ slate comprises some of the best business executives in the
world with the right experience and expertise for Hess. The entire
Hess slate is new and independent; they agreed to work on behalf of
all Hess shareholders after evaluating both Hess’ plan and Elliott’s
plan. Notwithstanding Elliott’s false claims to the contrary, the Hess
slate includes proven senior executives with leading oil & gas
expertise, all of whom are new to Hess. The Hess slate includes the
previous Vice Chairman of GE and CEO of GE Energy; the former top U.S.
E&P executive at ConocoPhillips who pioneered expansion in emerging
shale plays; the CFO of Viacom/CBS who during his tenure oversaw the
transformation of a legacy industrial conglomerate into a leading
media company; a recently retired member of the Executive Committee of
Royal Dutch Shell, who is widely acknowledged to be one of the world’s
top oil & gas executives; and the senior executive at BP who was
responsible for their most important and valuable businesses. As a
research analyst recently observed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Star Board. HES will add six new independent directors, all
former business executives, each with decades of distinguished
careers, including three with extensive oil industry experience.
The new board should help guide HES with executing its
transformation strategy into a pure E&P play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Fadel Gheit, Oppenheimer, March 5, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Wall Street research analysts have concluded that Hess
has the superior plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the steps taken over the past three years management has
revealed a sound strategy that we believe is tough to beat... Hess
is executing a strategy we believe underpins a material release of
value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Doug Leggate, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, April 25, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With $3.4 Bn in announced proceeds, execution has been
outstanding thus far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Asit Sen, Cowen, April 5, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HES presented a robust, multi-pronged strategy to accelerate
its pure-play E&P transformation... We view the company's
proactive stance and exceptional clarity with its investor base as
a major blow to activist claims.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Eliot Javanmardi, Capital One, March 6, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We take management’s side in terms of the future course of the
company.... we do not think breaking up the company into an
onshore resource player (Hess Resources) and international, mostly
offshore, entity (Hess Remainco) is the best way to generate value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Jeb Armstrong, Credit Agricole, March 26, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the activist end game is an outright separation of Hess into
two parts, we maintain our view that commensurate risks &
challenges of two stand alone entities will blur the landscape for
the investment case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Doug Leggate, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, April 25, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In short…we do not believe that [Elliott’s] plan provides the
best path forward. In our view, Hess's own plan makes more sense…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Philip H. Weiss, Argus, March 27, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe the choice is clear. The Hess plan has momentum; it is
delivering operationally and financially, while increasing shareholder
returns. We urge Hess shareholders to vote for its new, highly
qualified, independent director nominees to ensure that Hess’ future is
guided by an independent Board of Directors focused on value creation
for all Hess shareholders.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you have the
opportunity to protect your investment by promptly voting the WHITE
proxy card. We urge you to vote today by telephone, by Internet, or
by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE
proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided. We urge you to
reject Elliott’s short term, value destructive ideas by discarding any
proxy materials sent to you by Elliott Management or its representatives.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, we thank you for your continued
support, and we look forward to continuing to deliver outstanding value
to you in the future.
Sincerely,
John Hess
Chairman and CEO
For information about Hess’ transformation and the 2013 Annual Meeting,
please visit: www.transforminghess.com.
About Hess’ New, World-Class Independent
Directors:
-
John Krenicki Jr. Former
Vice Chairman of GE; President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Energy
Mr. Krenicki’s experience leading large scale initiatives and
operations across a global energy portfolio will add important
perspective to the Hess Board as the Company completes its
transformation to a pure play E&P company.
-
Dr. Kevin Meyers Former
Senior Vice President of E&P for the Americas, ConocoPhillips
Dr. Meyers was at the forefront of the oil & gas industry’s focus on
developing U.S. shale formations. He led ConocoPhillips’ expansion
in emerging shale plays, including the Eagle Ford, Permian Basin,
and Bakken shale plays. Dr. Meyers will bring to the Hess Board
decades of managing cost-efficient E&P operations in shale and
conventional properties directly relevant to Hess’ focused E&P
portfolio.
-
Fredric Reynolds Former
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, CBS Corporation
Mr. Reynolds will bring to the Hess Board his substantial experience
as a CFO with a successful track record of financial oversight,
leading a successful transformation, returning capital, and
delivering long term returns.
-
William Schrader Former Chief
Operating Officer, TNK-BP Russia
Mr. Schrader is an outstanding E&P executive responsible for
transforming BP’s best and most valued E&P assets, and will bring to
the Board his experience as a disciplined E&P operator with
expertise in production sharing structures, government relations,
and delivering returns.
-
Dr. Mark Williams Former
Executive Committee Member, Royal Dutch Shell
Dr. Williams worked for over 30 years at Shell, including more than
17 years of U.S. E&P experience, serving most recently as a member
of the Executive Committee of Royal Dutch Shell, where he was one of
the top three operating executives collectively responsible for all
strategic, capital, and operational matters. He is widely
acknowledged to be one of the world’s top oil & gas executives, and
will add invaluable insight to Hess’ Board.
Cautionary Statements
This document contains projections and other forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These projections
and statements reflect the Company’s current views with respect to
future events and financial performance. No assurances can be given,
however, that these events will occur or that these projections will be
achieved, and actual results could differ materially from those
projected as a result of certain risk factors. A discussion of these
risk factors is included in the Company’s periodic reports filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This document contains quotes and excerpts from certain previously
published material. Consent of the author and publication has not been
obtained to use the material as proxy soliciting material.
Important Additional Information
Hess Corporation, its directors and certain of its executive officers
may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from
Hess shareholders in connection with the matters to be considered at
Hess’ 2013 Annual Meeting. Hess has filed a definitive proxy statement
and form of WHITE proxy card with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission in connection with the 2013 Annual Meeting. HESS SHAREHOLDERS
ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND
ACCOMPANYING WHITE PROXY CARD AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION.
Information regarding the identity of potential participants, and their
direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, is set
forth in the proxy statement and other materials filed with the SEC.
Shareholders will be able to obtain any proxy statement, any amendments
or supplements to the proxy statement and other documents filed by Hess
with the SEC for no charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Copies will also be available at no charge at Hess’ website at www.hess.com,
by writing to Hess Corporation at 1185 Avenue of the Americas, New York,
NY 10036, by calling Hess’ proxy solicitor, MacKenzie Partners,
toll-free at (800) 322-2885 or by email at hess@mackenziepartners.com.
Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http://www.businesswire.com/multimedia/home/20130430006724/en/