Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF) today reported earnings for the
quarter ended June 30, 2013.
Key points:
-
Reported net income available to common shareholders of $259 million,
as compared to $327 million in the first quarter and $284 million in
the second quarter of the prior year. Reported earnings available to
common shareholders per diluted share of $0.18.
-
Pre-tax pre-provision income1 from continuing
operations totaled $421 million, which included $56 million in
costs associated with the early termination of certain debt and
preferred securities. Excluding these costs and securities gains,
pre-tax pre-provision income1 increased 6 percent from
the previous quarter.
-
Net interest income totaled $808 million, up $10 million from the
prior quarter
-
Net interest margin was 3.16 percent, an improvement of 3 basis
points from the prior quarter
-
Non-interest revenue totaled $497 million, down 1 percent from the
prior quarter
-
Non-interest expenses totaled $884 million; excluding costs
associated with the early termination of certain debt and
preferred securities1, non-interest expenses declined 2
percent from the prior quarter
-
Balance sheet improvement highlighted by loan growth
-
Total ending loans rose $1.1 billion linked quarter or 1.4
percent. Total new loan production was $8 billion, an increase of
23 percent linked quarter and 14 percent year over year.
-
Total business lending, which includes commercial and investor
real estate portfolios, increased 2 percent linked quarter, led by
commercial and industrial loans, which grew 5 percent
-
Total consumer loans were flat linked quarter, with growth in
indirect auto, credit card and other consumer loans offset by a
decline in residential mortgage and home equity lending
-
Funding mix continued to improve as average time deposits declined
$1.5 billion
-
Deposit costs declined to 15 basis points, down 3 basis points
from the first quarter, and total funding costs were down 5 basis
points linked quarter to 40 basis points
-
Asset quality continues to improve
-
Net charge-offs of $144 million, or 77 basis points, were down
linked quarter; the loan loss provision of $31 million was $113
million less than net charge-offs
-
Both non-performing assets and non-performing loans decreased 5
percent linked quarter
-
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans declined 19
basis points linked quarter to 2.18 percent, while the ratio of
allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans decreased one
basis point to 1.09x
-
Capital and liquidity positions remain strong
-
Successfully completed several capital plan actions reducing
funding costs
-
Solid capital position with an estimated Tier 1 ratio of 11.7
percent and Tier 1 Common ratio1 of 11.2 percent at
June 30, 2013
-
Liquidity position remains solid with a low loan-to-deposit ratio
of 81 percent
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
$808
|
|
|
$798
|
|
|
$838
|
Securities gains, net
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
12
|
Other non-interest income
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
495
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
1,345
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
26
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
842
|
Pre-tax income
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
477
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
126
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
(A)
|
|
268
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
351
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
4
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
355
|
Preferred dividends and accretion
|
|
(B)
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
71
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
|
|
$259
|
|
|
$327
|
|
|
$284
|
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders
(A)–(B)
|
|
|
|
$260
|
|
|
$325
|
|
|
$280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
Pre-tax Pre-Provision Income (non-GAAP)1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders
(GAAP) (A)–(B)
|
|
|
|
$260
|
|
|
$325
|
|
|
$280
|
Plus: Preferred dividends (GAAP)
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
71
|
Plus: Income tax expense (GAAP)
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
126
|
Pre-tax income from continuing operations (GAAP)
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
477
|
Plus: Provision for loan losses (GAAP)
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
26
|
Pre-tax pre-provision income from continuing operations
(non-GAAP)1
|
|
|
|
$421
|
|
|
$457
|
|
|
$503
|
Plus: Securities gains, net, and other adjustments1 |
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
(17)
|
Adjusted pre-tax pre-provision income from continuing operations
(non-GAAP)1
|
|
|
|
$469
|
|
|
$442
|
|
|
$486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
Key ratios*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (FTE)
|
|
|
3.16%
|
|
|
3.13%
|
|
|
3.16%
|
Tier 1 capital*
|
|
|
11.7%
|
|
|
12.4%
|
|
|
11.0%
|
Tier 1 common* risk-based ratio1 (non-GAAP)
|
|
|
11.2%
|
|
|
11.2%
|
|
|
10.0%
|
Tangible common stockholders’ equity to tangible assets1 (non-GAAP)
|
|
|
8.72%
|
|
|
8.98%
|
|
|
8.04%
|
Tangible common book value per share1 (non-GAAP)
|
|
|
$7.11
|
|
|
$7.29
|
|
|
$6.69
|
Asset quality
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as % of net loans
|
|
2.18%
|
|
|
2.37%
|
|
|
3.01%
|
Net charge-offs as % of average net loans~
|
|
|
0.77%
|
|
|
0.99%
|
|
|
1.39%
|
Non-accrual loans, excluding loans held for sale, as % of loans
|
|
|
2.01%
|
|
|
2.15%
|
|
|
2.51%
|
Non-performing assets as % of loans, foreclosed properties and
non-performing loans held for sale
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
2.41%
|
|
|
3.04%
|
Non-performing assets (including 90+ past due) as % of loans,
foreclosed properties and non-performing loans held for sale2
|
|
|
2.68%
|
|
|
2.88%
|
|
|
3.49%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Tier 1 Common and Tier 1 Capital ratios for the current quarter are
estimated
|
~Annualized
|
1 Non-GAAP, refer to pages 8 and 16-17 of the financial
supplement to this earnings release
|
2 Guaranteed residential first mortgages were excluded
from the 90+ past due amounts, refer to pages 11 and 14 of the
financial supplement to this earnings release
|
|
|
Positive momentum continues
Regions reported second quarter net income available to common
shareholders of $259 million, or $0.18 per diluted share. During the
second quarter the company executed several liability management
activities that reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.03.
Regions’ performance for the quarter demonstrates that the company’s
disciplined focus on identifying and meeting customer needs is resulting
in sustainable growth across the franchise. Notably, total ending loan
balances were up $1.1 billion linked quarter or 1.4 percent. Overall
loan growth reflects slow but steady economic improvement in the
company’s core markets as business and consumer deleveraging has slowed
and demand for credit has begun to modestly increase. In addition, the
company continues to grow organically by expanding the customer base
through steady household growth and a disciplined focus on customer
service.
“Regions’ positive momentum continued in the second quarter, as
evidenced by broad-based loan and customer growth across our franchise
with successful execution of key capital plan actions,” said Grayson
Hall, chairman, president and CEO. “By continuing to execute on our
business priorities, our company is well-positioned to capitalize on
opportunities as the economy continues to improve.”
Capital plan actions reduce funding costs, increase return to
shareholders
During the second quarter the company began executing various components
of its capital plan. These actions improved the company’s financial
performance by reducing funding costs, and at the same time, provided
higher returns to shareholders through an increase in the dividend and
the repurchase of common shares.
In addition to increasing the common dividend from $0.01 per diluted
share to $0.03 per diluted share and beginning to execute on the
approved share repurchases, this quarter’s capital plan accomplishments
included:
-
Redeeming $350 million of 7.75% senior notes
-
Issuing $750 million of 2% senior notes
-
Redeeming $498 million of 6.625% Trust Preferred Securities
-
Redeeming $100 million of 7.75% Union Planters REIT Preferred Stock
Future net income will benefit from lower funding costs due to the
redemption of higher cost liabilities that were replaced by lower cost
debt. In addition, earnings per diluted share will benefit from the
reduced share count. However, certain of these activities reduced second
quarter pre-tax net income to common shareholders by $56 million and
lowered earnings per diluted share by $0.03.
Loan balances increase
Total ending loan balances were $75 billion, an increase of $1.1 billion
or 1.4 percent linked quarter. Loan growth was broad-based among product
lines as well as across the company’s geographic footprint as
approximately 70 percent of the company’s areas experienced loan growth.
Total new loan production for the quarter was $8 billion, an increase of
23 percent linked quarter.
Total business lending, which is made up of commercial loans and
investor real estate loans, increased 2.2 percent to $46 billion at
quarter end. These loans make up 61 percent of the total loan portfolio.
Much of this increase was driven by commercial and industrial loans,
which experienced growth for the twelfth straight quarter. Ending loans
in this category were up 5 percent compared to the prior quarter, and 11
percent over the same period last year. New loan production in this
portfolio increased 36 percent linked quarter to $4 billion as the
company experienced pick up in lending to small businesses as well as
seasonal growth in demand overall. In addition, total commercial and
industrial line commitments grew $2 billion, or 5 percent linked quarter.
The investor real estate portfolio declined during the second quarter;
however, this portfolio experienced a more modest rate of decline
compared to previous quarters. The pace of de-risking has slowed and has
been somewhat offset by new production. Total new and renewed production
in this portfolio increased 12 percent from the prior quarter and was
driven by lending to well-qualified home builders and developers in
select markets. At quarter end, the investor real estate portfolio
totaled $7 billion and comprised 9 percent of the total loan portfolio,
compared to 12 percent one year ago.
Consumer loans totaled $29 billion on an ending basis and remained flat
linked quarter, indicating that consumer deleveraging has begun to
subside. Consumer loan production totaled $3 billion in the second
quarter, an increase of 12 percent over the prior quarter. Indirect auto
loans experienced an increase in ending balances of 9 percent linked
quarter. Production in the indirect auto portfolio totaled $508 million
during the quarter, an increase of 21 percent linked quarter and 40
percent over the prior year.
Declines in the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios offset
the growth in the indirect auto, credit card and other consumer
portfolios as consumers continue to pay down real estate debt. However,
loan originations for new home purchases were up for the quarter,
accounting for almost 53 percent of all mortgage applications, compared
to 35 percent last quarter.
Improved funding mix continues to drive deposit costs lower
Average low-cost deposits increased slightly linked quarter, while
higher cost time deposits declined 11 percent. This mix shift drove
continued improvement in the company’s funding composition, as low-cost
deposits as a percentage of total deposits rose to 88 percent, compared
to 83 percent last year. This positive mix shift resulted in deposit
costs declining to 15 basis points for the quarter, down 3 basis points
from first quarter and down 17 basis points from last year. As a result,
total funding costs declined to 40 basis points, down 20 basis points
from the same period one year ago.
Net interest income increased and net interest margin expanded
Taxable-equivalent net interest income was $821 million, a $10 million
or 1 percent increase linked quarter. This was driven by growth in
loans, an additional day count, as well as the continued decline in
deposit costs. The resulting net interest margin expanded 3 basis points
linked quarter to 3.16 percent, primarily attributable to lower deposit
costs and a reduction in cash holdings at the Federal Reserve.
Non-interest revenue impacted by lower mortgage revenue
Non-interest revenue totaled $497 million, down 1 percent linked
quarter. Mortgage income for the quarter totaled $69 million, a decline
of 4 percent linked quarter. Mortgage production for the quarter was
approximately $1.9 billion, a 6 percent increase from the prior quarter.
The increase in market rates impacted the pipeline as well as the
mortgage servicing rights (MSR) hedge, resulting in the net decrease in
mortgage income. Service charges income was down 2 percent linked
quarter, driven by lower non-sufficient fund (NSF) fees.
Expenses impacted by costs associated with capital plan actions
Non-interest expenses of $884 million increased 5 percent from the prior
quarter, including $56 million in costs related to capital plan actions.
Excluding these costs1, non-interest expense declined 2
percent compared to the prior quarter. During the quarter, legal and
professional fees as well as credit costs declined and were partially
offset by increases in salaries and benefits. Total headcount increased
this quarter by 226 positions primarily related to the addition of
income-producing associates in the Regions Investment Services division
that is part of the Wealth Management line of business.
Asset quality improvement continues
Asset quality continued to improve in the second quarter. The provision
for loan losses totaled $31 million, or $113 million less than net
charge-offs. Total net charge-offs were $144 million, a decline of 20
percent linked quarter and net charge-offs as a percentage of total
average loans was 0.77 percent. The company’s loan loss allowance to
non-performing loans coverage ratio was 1.09x and the allowance for loan
losses as a percentage of loans was 2.18 percent as of June 30, 2013.
Non-performing assets totaled $1.7 billion and were down $93 million, or
5 percent linked quarter. Non-performing loans, excluding loans held for
sale, improved $80 million, or 5 percent linked quarter. Inflows of
non-performing loans were $328 million and total delinquencies were down
7 percent. Commercial and investor real estate criticized loans declined
4 percent in the quarter and were down 28 percent year-over-year.
Strong capital and solid liquidity
As previously mentioned, during the second quarter the company executed
a number of transactions that continue to enhance the cost and
efficiency of the company’s debt and capital structure. Tier 1 and Tier
1 common1 capital ratios remained strong, ending the second
quarter at an estimated 11.7 percent and 11.2 percent, respectively. The
company’s liquidity position at both the bank and the holding company
remains solid. As of June 30, 2013, the company’s loan-to-deposit ratio
was 81 percent compared to 79 percent in the first quarter.
1 Non-GAAP, refer to pages 8 and 16-17 of the financial
supplement to this earnings release.
About Regions Financial Corporation
Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF), with $119 billion in assets, is
a member of the S&P 500 Index and is one of the nation’s largest
full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth
management, mortgage, and insurance products and services. Regions
serves customers in 16 states across the South, Midwest and Texas, and
through its subsidiary, Regions Bank, operates approximately 1,700
banking offices and 2,000 ATMs. Additional information about Regions and
its full line of products and services can be found at www.regions.com.
Forward-looking statements
This release may include forward-looking statements which reflect
Regions’ current views with respect to future events and financial
performance. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“the
Act”) provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements which are
identified as such and are accompanied by the identification of
important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from the forward-looking statements. For these statements, we,
together with our subsidiaries, unless the context implies otherwise,
claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor in the Act. Forward-looking
statements are not based on historical information, but rather are
related to future operations, strategies, financial results or other
developments. Forward-looking statements are based on
management’s expectations as well as certain assumptions and estimates
made by, and information available to, management at the time the
statements are made. Those statements are based on general
assumptions and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other
factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the
views, beliefs and projections expressed in such statements. These
risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to,
those described below:
-
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the
“Dodd-Frank Act”) became law in July 2010, and a number of
legislative, regulatory and tax proposals remain pending. Future and
proposed rules may have significant effects on Regions and the
financial services industry, the exact nature and extent of which
cannot be determined at this time.
-
Possible additional loan losses, impairment of goodwill and other
intangibles, and adjustment of valuation allowances on deferred tax
assets and the impact on earnings and capital.
-
Possible changes in interest rates may increase funding costs and
reduce earning asset yields, thus reducing margins. Increases in
benchmark interest rates could also increase debt service requirements
for customers whose terms include a variable interest rate, which may
negatively impact the ability of borrowers to pay as contractually
obligated.
-
Possible adverse changes in general economic and business
conditions in the United States in general and in the communities
Regions serves in particular.
-
Possible changes in the creditworthiness of customers and the
possible impairment of the collectability of loans.
-
Possible changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, laws and
regulations and other activities of governments, agencies, and similar
organizations, may have an adverse effect on business.
-
Possible regulations issued by the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau or other regulators which might adversely impact Regions’
business model or products and services.
-
Regions’ ability to take certain capital actions, including paying
dividends and any plans to increase common stock dividends, repurchase
common stock under current or future programs, or issue or redeem
preferred stock or other regulatory capital instruments, is subject to
the review of such proposed actions by the Federal Reserve as part of
Regions’ comprehensive capital plan for the applicable period in
connection with the regulators’ Comprehensive Capital Analysis and
Review (CCAR) process and to the acceptance of such capital plan and
non-objection to such capital actions by the Federal Reserve.
-
Possible stresses in the financial and real estate markets,
including possible deterioration in property values.
-
Regions’ ability to manage fluctuations in the value of assets and
liabilities and off-balance sheet exposure so as to maintain
sufficient capital and liquidity to support Regions’ business.
-
Regions’ ability to expand into new markets and to maintain profit
margins in the face of competitive pressures.
-
Regions’ ability to develop competitive new products and services
in a timely manner and the acceptance of such products and services by
Regions’ customers and potential customers.
-
Cyber-security risks, including “denial of service,” “hacking”and
“identity theft,” that could adversely affect our business and
financial performance, or our reputation.
-
Regions’ ability to keep pace with technological changes.
-
Regions’ ability to effectively identify and manage credit risk,
interest rate risk, market risk, operational risk, legal risk,
liquidity risk, reputational risk, counterparty risk, international
risk, regulatory risk, and compliance risk.
-
Regions’ ability to ensure adequate capitalization which is
impacted by inherent uncertainties in forecasting credit losses.
-
The cost and other effects of material contingencies, including
litigation contingencies, and any adverse judicial, administrative or
arbitral rulings or proceedings.
-
The effects of increased competition from both banks and non-banks.
-
The effects of geopolitical instability and risks such as terrorist
attacks.
-
Regions’ ability to identify and address data security breaches.
-
Possible changes in consumer and business spending and saving
habits could affect Regions’ ability to increase assets and to attract
deposits.
-
The effects of weather and natural disasters such as floods,
droughts, wind, tornados and hurricanes, and the effects of man-made
disasters.
-
Possible downgrades in ratings issued by rating agencies.
-
Possible changes in the speed of loan prepayments by Regions’
customers and loan origination or sales volumes.
-
Possible acceleration of prepayments on mortgage-backed securities
due to low interest rates and the related acceleration of premium
amortization on those securities.
-
The effects of problems encountered by larger or similar financial
institutions that adversely affect Regions or the banking industry
generally.
-
Regions’ ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries.
-
The effects of the failure of any component of Regions’ business
infrastructure which is provided by a third party.
-
Changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other regulatory agencies.
-
The effects of any damage to Regions’ reputation resulting from
developments related to any of the items identified above.
The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. For discussion of
these and other factors that may cause actual results to differ from
expectations, look under the captions “Forward-Looking Statements” and
“Risk Factors” of Regions’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012 and the Forward-Looking Statements” section of
Regions’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” and similar
expressions often signify forward-looking statements. You should not
place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only
as of the date made. We assume no obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements that are made from time to time.
Use of non-GAAP financial measures
Regions believes that the presentation of pre-tax, pre-provision
income (PPI) and the exclusion of certain items from PPI provides a
meaningful base for period-to-period comparisons, which management
believes will assist investors in analyzing the operating results of the
company and predicting future performance. These non-GAAP
financial measures are also used by management to assess the performance
of Regions’ business. It is possible that the activities related to the
adjustments may recur; however, management does not consider the
activities related to the adjustments to be indications of ongoing
operations. Regions believes that presentation of these non-GAAP
financial measures will permit investors to assess the performance of
the company on the same basis as applied by management.
Tangible common stockholders’ equity ratios have become a focus of
some investors and management believes they may assist investors in
analyzing the capital position of the company absent the effects of
intangible assets and preferred stock. Traditionally, the Federal
Reserve and other banking regulatory bodies have assessed a bank’s
capital adequacy based on Tier 1 capital, the calculation of which is
codified in federal banking regulations. In connection with the
company’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review process, these
regulators supplement their assessment of the capital adequacy of a bank
based on a variation of Tier 1 capital, known as Tier 1 common equity.
While not prescribed in amount by federal banking regulations, under
Basel I, analysts and banking regulators have assessed Regions’ capital
adequacy using the tangible common stockholders’ equity and/or the Tier
1 common equity measure. Because tangible common stockholders’
equity and Tier 1 common equity are not formally defined by GAAP or
prescribed in amount by the federal banking regulations, under Basel I,
these measures are currently considered to be non-GAAP financial
measures and other entities may calculate them differently than Regions’
disclosed calculations. Since analysts and banking regulators may
assess Regions’ capital adequacy using tangible common stockholders’
equity and Tier 1 common equity, management believes that it is useful
to provide investors the ability to assess Regions’ capital adequacy on
these same bases.
Tier 1 common equity is often expressed as a percentage of
risk-weighted assets. Under the risk-based capital framework, a
company’s balance sheet assets and credit equivalent amounts of
off-balance sheet items are assigned to one of four broad risk
categories. The aggregated dollar amount in each category is then
multiplied by the risk-weighted category. The resulting weighted
values from each of the four categories are added together, and this sum
is the risk-weighted assets total that, as adjusted, comprises the
denominator of certain risk-based capital ratios. Tier 1 capital
is then divided by this denominator (risk-weighted assets) to determine
the Tier 1 capital ratio. Adjustments are made to Tier 1 capital
to arrive at Tier 1 common equity. Tier 1 common equity is also
divided by the risk-weighted assets to determine the Tier 1 common
equity ratio. The amounts disclosed as risk-weighted assets are
calculated consistent with banking regulatory requirements.
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not
required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. To mitigate these
limitations, Regions has policies in place to identify and address
expenses that qualify for non-GAAP presentation, including authorization
and system controls to ensure accurate period to period comparisons.
Although these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by
stakeholders in the evaluation of a company, they have limitations as
analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a
substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP. In
particular, a measure of earnings that excludes selected items do not
represent the amount that effectively accrues directly to stockholders.
Management and the Board of Directors utilize non-GAAP measures as
follows:
-
Preparation of Regions’ operating budgets
-
Monthly financial performance reporting
-
Monthly close-out reporting of consolidated results (management
only)
-
Presentation to investors of company performance
See page 8 of the supplement to this earnings release for the
computation of income (loss) from continuing operations available to
common shareholders (GAAP) to pre-tax pre-provision income from
continuing operations (non-GAAP) to adjusted pre-tax pre-provision
income from continuing operations (non-GAAP). See pages 16-17 of the
supplement to this earnings release for 1) a reconciliation and
computation of adjusted income (loss) available to common shareholders
(non-GAAP), and adjusted income (loss) from continuing operations
available to common shareholders (non-GAAP), 2) computation of return on
average assets from continuing operations (GAAP) and adjusted return on
average assets from continuing operations (non-GAAP), 3) a
reconciliation of average and ending stockholders’ equity (GAAP) to
average and ending tangible common stockholders’ equity (non-GAAP), 4)
computation of return on average tangible common stockholders’ equity
(non-GAAP) and adjusted return on average tangible common stockholders’
equity (non-GAAP), 5) a reconciliation of total assets (GAAP) to
tangible assets (non-GAAP), 6) computation of tangible common
stockholders’ equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP) and tangible common
book value per share (non-GAAP), 7) a reconciliation of stockholders’
equity (GAAP) to Tier 1 common equity (non-GAAP), 8)
computation of Tier 1 common risk–based ratio (non-GAAP), 9) a
reconciliation of non-interest expense (GAAP) to adjusted non-interest
expense (non-GAAP), 10) a reconciliation of non-interest income (GAAP)
to adjusted non-interest income (non-GAAP), and 11) a computation of the
adjusted efficiency ratio and fee income ratio (non-GAAP).
Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http://www.businesswire.com/multimedia/home/20130723005146/en/
Copyright Business Wire 2013