Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Finkelstein Thompson LLP and Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP Defeat NASDAQ's Motion to Dismiss Shareholders' Negligence Claims in Connection with Facebook IPO

NDAQ, META

Shareholders who participated in Facebook’s (NASDAQ: FB) IPO won a victory on December 11, 2013, when Judge Sweet of the Southern District of New York rejected NASDAQ’s (NASDAQ: NDAQ) motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging NASDAQ negligently failed to properly test and design its systems. The suit claims that NASDAQ’s negligence significantly damaged certain shareholders who purchased or sold shares in the IPO, and seeks compensation for those shareholders. Washington D.C. law firm Finkelstein Thompson LLP, along with New York law firm Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP, serve as co-lead counsel for the negligence claims in the consolidated Facebook litigation. Judge Sweet's opinion is here. Judge Sweet also denied NASDAQ’s motion to dismiss federal securities claims based on the same events.

While NASDAQ claimed it enjoyed absolute immunity from liability for its purportedly “regulatory” actions in connection with the IPO, the Court stated that NASDAQ “represents no one but itself when it entices investors to trade on its exchange.” The Court found that permitting immunity would “allow unrestrained motives for profit to go unchecked,” and that exchanges could not escape liability for failures to “exercise due care in their pursuits of profit.”

The Court also granted the Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint, noting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s issuance of an order containing “new factual findings, released one month after Plaintiffs filed their complaint, which are directly relevant to and support of Plaintiffs’ claims.” The decision acknowledges the dramatic shift over time in the nature of securities exchanges, which have evolved from non-profit mutual associations owned by their members to for-profit corporations, and recognizes the critical role private litigation plays in ensuring exchanges conduct themselves appropriately, and in providing remedies to shareholders when they do not.

To learn more about Finkelstein Thompson LLP, please visit our website at www.finkelsteinthompson.com or call our Washington, D.C. office at (877)-337-1050.

To learn more about Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP, please visit our website at www.lshllp.com or call our New York City office at (212)-608-1900.



Get the latest news and updates from Stockhouse on social media

Follow STOCKHOUSE Today