All financial information contained within this news release has been
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP including comparative figures
pertaining to Enerplus' 2012 results. This news release includes
forward-looking statements and information within the meaning of
applicable securities laws. Readers are advised to review the
"Forward-Looking Information and Statements" at the conclusion of this
news release. Readers are also referred to "Information Regarding
Reserves, Resources and Operational Information", "Notice to U.S.
Readers" and "Non-GAAP Measures" at the end of this news release for
information regarding the presentation of the financial, reserves,
contingent resources and operational information in this news release.
A full copy of our 2013 Financial Statements and MD&A are available on
our website at www.enerplus.com, under our profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the EDGAR website at www.sec.gov.
CALGARY, Feb. 21, 2014 /CNW/ - Enerplus Corporation ("Enerplus") (TSX:
ERF) (NYSE: ERF) is pleased to announce fourth quarter 2013 results as
well as 2013 year-end operating and financial results.
2013 KEY TAKEAWAYS:
-
Funds flow per share grew by 14%
-
Production grew by 9%, exceeding guidance in spite of non-core asset
sales
-
Proved plus probable reserves were up 17% year-over-year, replacing 284%
of 2013 production
-
Capital spending, operating costs and general and administrative costs
were all reduced
-
Debt to funds flow ratio at year-end improved to 1.4x
4th Quarter 2013:
-
Production continued to grow during the fourth quarter of 2013 averaging
94,167 BOE per day, up 7% from the previous quarter and 10% compared to
the same period in 2012. Production during the month of December
averaged 99,569 BOE per day, ahead of our exit guidance of 95,000 BOE
per day. Marcellus production exceeded our expectations, producing 170
MMcf per day during the month of December including the additional
working interests acquired in late November. Crude oil and natural gas
liquids volumes were virtually unchanged quarter over quarter, despite
the sale of 900 barrels per day of crude oil in Canada. As a result of
the higher volumes from the Marcellus, our production weighting to
natural gas increased to 56% during the fourth quarter.
-
We invested $223 million in capital projects during the quarter, with
over two thirds of the spending directed to oil projects. A total of 18
net wells were drilled, with 19 net wells brought on-stream.
-
Funds flow totaled $181 million during the fourth quarter, down 8% from
the previous quarter. Despite the growth in production volumes, a
widening of crude oil differentials resulted in a decrease of almost
20% in our average realized crude oil price compared to the previous
quarter.
-
Cash operating costs and general and administrative expenses per BOE
were both down compared to the third quarter, averaging $10.46 and
$2.28 per BOE, respectively.
-
We closed a number of transactions during the fourth quarter including
the acquisition of additional working interests in our Marcellus
natural gas properties for $158 million. Through this acquisition, we
added 17,000 net acres in existing properties in northeast Pennsylvania
with approximately 42 MMcf per day of natural gas production.
-
We also closed the sale of non-core producing assets in Canada for
proceeds of $104 million. In addition, we entered into an agreement to
sell our undeveloped Montney acreage in British Columbia for $135
million, after adjustments, of which $66 million closed during the
quarter with the remainder closed in January of 2014.
2013 SUMMARY:
-
We delivered annual production growth of 9% in 2013, exceeding both our
annual and exit production forecasts for the year. Daily production
averaged 89,800 BOE, ahead of guidance of 89,000 BOE per day. Total oil
production increased by 5% in 2013 to average 38,250 barrels per day,
despite the sale of 2,700 BOE per day of non-core oil production.
-
Natural gas production increased by 15% to average 288 MMcf per day for
the year, representing 54% of our annual production volumes. Strong
well performance in the Marcellus combined with the acquisition of
additional working interests in December helped to drive this result.
-
Funds flow grew by 17% year-over-year to $754 million due to the
increase in production volumes, lower costs and an increase in
commodity prices. On a per share basis, this was a 14% increase.
-
Capital spending came in slightly lower than our forecast of $685
million, totaling $681 million. Approximately 70% of our spending was
directed to our crude oil assets with the majority invested at Fort
Berthold, North Dakota. We invested 82% of our budget on drilling and
completion activities, with 62 net wells drilled and brought on-stream
across our asset base.
-
We continued to concentrate our portfolio throughout 2013. We sold $365
million of non-core assets, redeploying $245 million to increase our
working interests in our crude oil waterflood portfolio and in the
Marcellus. This also includes additional acreage acquired in the
Wilrich, Marcellus and Bakken/Three Forks plays. Our net acquisition
and divestment activities realized gross proceeds of $120 million in
2013.
-
Our capital efficiencies improved again in 2013. Based upon our capital
spending and the growth in production volumes from the fourth quarter
of 2012 to the same period in 2013, this reflects a capital efficiency
of approximately $26,000 per daily BOE.
-
With the increase in funds flow, a reduction in capital spending and
improved capital efficiencies, our adjusted payout ratio improved to
114% in 2013 including participation in our Stock Dividend Plan
("SDP"). Monthly dividends to shareholders were maintained throughout
the year, totaling $1.08 per share and represented 23% of funds flow
including the SDP.
-
As a result of the growth in funds flow and the net proceeds from our
divestment activities, our financial flexibility increased in 2013.
Approximately 80% of our bank credit facility was undrawn and our
trailing twelve month debt-to-funds-flow ratio fell to 1.4 times at
year-end, down from 1.7 times at year-end 2012.
-
Our proved plus probable ("2P") company interest reserves increased by
17% at year-end, replacing 284% of our 2013 average daily production.
-
Finding and development costs including future development capital
("FDC") were $11.28 per BOE. When divided by our corporate netback of
$27.40 per BOE, this reflects a 2.4x recycle ratio.
-
Finding, development and acquisition costs, including FDC, were $8.36
per BOE.
-
The net present value of our future net revenues discounted at 10%
before tax increased by 7% in 2013 to approximately $5 billion.
SELECTED FINANCIAL RESULTS
|
Three months ended December 31,
|
|
Twelve months ended December 31,
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
Financial (000's)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds Flow
|
$180,741
|
$200,411
|
|
$754,233
|
$644,523
|
Cash and Stock Dividends
|
54,665
|
53,572
|
|
216,864
|
301,560
|
Net Income
|
29,626
|
34,637
|
|
47,976
|
(270,697)
|
Debt Outstanding - net of cash
|
1,022,308
|
1,064,365
|
|
1,022,308
|
1,064,365
|
Capital Spending
|
223,035
|
160,934
|
|
681,437
|
853,455
|
Property and Land Acquisitions
|
173,387
|
121,391
|
|
244,837
|
185,337
|
Property Divestitures
|
168,050
|
220,135
|
|
365,135
|
275,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to Trailing 12 Month Funds Flow
|
1.4x
|
1.7x
|
|
1.4x
|
1.7x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial per Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds Flow
|
$0.89
|
$1.01
|
|
$3.76
|
$3.29
|
Net Income
|
0.15
|
0.17
|
|
0.24
|
(1.38)
|
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding (000's)
|
202,257
|
198,256
|
|
200,567
|
195,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Results per BOE(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & Natural Gas Sales(3)
|
$43.79
|
$45.86
|
|
$48.11
|
$44.56
|
Royalties
|
(7.46)
|
(7.28)
|
|
(8.06)
|
(7.06)
|
Production Taxes
|
(2.07)
|
(2.26)
|
|
(2.15)
|
(1.89)
|
Commodity Derivative Instruments
|
1.90
|
2.04
|
|
0.81
|
0.61
|
Operating Costs
|
(10.46)
|
(9.14)
|
|
(10.50)
|
(10.51)
|
General and Administrative
|
(2.28)
|
(2.34)
|
|
(2.54)
|
(2.61)
|
Share Based Compensation
|
(1.06)
|
(0.03)
|
|
(0.71)
|
(0.18)
|
Interest and Other Expenses
|
(1.51)
|
(1.45)
|
|
(1.71)
|
(1.42)
|
Taxes
|
0.01
|
0.08
|
|
(0.24)
|
(0.05)
|
Funds Flow
|
$20.86
|
$25.48
|
|
$23.01
|
$21.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED OPERATING RESULTS
|
Three months ended December 31,
|
|
Twelve months ended December 31,
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
Average Daily Production(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (bbls/day)
|
37,731
|
38,597
|
|
38,250
|
36,509
|
|
NGLs (bbls/day)
|
3,813
|
3,576
|
|
3,472
|
3,627
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf/day)
|
315,739
|
259,904
|
|
288,423
|
251,773
|
|
Total (BOE/day)
|
94,167
|
85,490
|
|
89,793
|
82,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Crude Oil & Natural Gas Liquids
|
44%
|
49%
|
|
46%
|
49%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Selling Price(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (per bbl)
|
$ 77.77
|
$ 76.75
|
|
$ 83.99
|
$ 78.19
|
|
NGLs (per bbl)
|
54.26
|
47.31
|
|
52.25
|
53.01
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
3.26
|
3.01
|
|
3.26
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Wells drilled
|
18
|
11
|
|
62
|
75
|
(1)
|
Non-cash amounts have been excluded.
|
(2)
|
Based on Company interest production volumes.
|
(3)
|
Net of oil and gas transportation costs, but before royalties and the
effects of commodity derivative instruments.
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31,
|
|
Twelve months ended December 31,
|
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
Average Benchmark Pricing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WTI crude oil (US$/bbl)
|
|
$97.46
|
$88.18
|
|
$97.97
|
$94.21
|
AECO- monthly index (CDN$/Mcf)
|
|
3.16
|
3.06
|
|
3.16
|
2.40
|
AECO- daily index (CDN$/Mcf)
|
|
3.53
|
3.22
|
|
3.17
|
2.39
|
NYMEX- monthly NX3 index (US$/Mcf)
|
|
3.63
|
3.36
|
|
3.67
|
2.80
|
USD/CDN exchange rate
|
|
1.05
|
0.99
|
|
1.03
|
1.00
|
SHARE TRADING SUMMARY
|
|
|
CDN* - ERF
|
|
U.S.** - ERF
|
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2013
|
|
|
(CDN$)
|
|
(US$)
|
High
|
|
|
$19.96
|
|
$18.79
|
Low
|
|
|
$12.26
|
|
$12.03
|
Close
|
|
|
$19.30
|
|
$18.18
|
* TSX and other Canadian trading data combined.
**NYSE and other U.S. trading data combined.
2013 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
|
|
|
CDN$
|
|
US$(1)
|
First Quarter Total
|
|
|
$0.27
|
|
$0.27
|
Second Quarter Total
|
|
|
$0.27
|
|
$0.26
|
Third Quarter Total
|
|
|
$0.27
|
|
$0.26
|
Fourth Quarter Total
|
|
|
$0.27
|
|
$0.26
|
Total
|
|
|
$1.08
|
|
$1.05
|
(1)
|
US$ dividends represent CDN$ dividends converted at the relevant foreign
exchange rate on the payment date.
|
2013 PRODUCTION & CAPITAL SPENDING
|
|
Crude Oil & NGLs (bbls/day)
|
|
Q4
2013
Average
Production
|
|
2013
Annual Average
Production
|
|
2013
Exit
Production*
|
|
2013
Capital
Spending
($million)
|
Canada
|
|
19,561
|
|
20,663
|
|
18,958
|
|
172.9
|
United States
|
|
21,983
|
|
21,059
|
|
21,455
|
|
316.2
|
Total Crude Oil & NGLs (bbls/day)
|
|
41,544
|
|
41,722
|
|
40,413
|
|
$489.1
|
Natural Gas (Mcf/day)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
165,114
|
|
175,876
|
|
161,965
|
|
113.7
|
United States
|
|
150,625
|
|
112,547
|
|
192,967
|
|
78.7
|
Total Natural Gas (Mcf/day)
|
|
315,739
|
|
288,423
|
|
354,932
|
|
$192.4
|
Company Total (BOE/day)
|
|
94,167
|
|
89,793
|
|
99,569
|
|
$681.4
|
*December month
2013 NET DRILLING ACTIVITY***
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Horizontal
Wells
|
|
Vertical
Wells
|
|
Total
Wells
|
|
Wells
Pending
Completion/
Tie-in *
|
|
Wells
On-stream**
|
|
Dry &
Abandoned
Wells
|
Canada
|
|
20.9
|
|
.2
|
|
21.1
|
|
1.8
|
|
18.6
|
|
-
|
United States
|
|
20.3
|
|
-
|
|
20.3
|
|
4.5
|
|
24.7
|
|
-
|
Total Crude Oil
|
|
41.2
|
|
.2
|
|
41.4
|
|
6.3
|
|
43.3
|
|
-
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
11.5
|
|
-
|
|
11.5
|
|
6.2
|
|
5.6
|
|
-
|
United States
|
|
9.3
|
|
-
|
|
9.3
|
|
5.6
|
|
12.7
|
|
-
|
Total Natural Gas
|
|
20.8
|
|
-
|
|
20.8
|
|
11.8
|
|
18.2
|
|
-
|
Company Total
|
|
62.0
|
|
.2
|
|
62.2
|
|
18.1
|
|
61.5
|
|
-
|
* Wells drilled during the year that are pending potential
completion/tie-in or abandonment as at December 31, 2013.
** Total wells brought on-stream during the year regardless of when they
were drilled.
*** Table may not add due to rounding.
ASSET ACTIVITY
Our 2013 capital program was focused in our four core areas - the U.S.
Bakken/Three Forks, the Marcellus, our Canadian crude oil waterfloods
and our deep gas opportunities within the Deep Basin region of Alberta.
Our single largest capital investment was once again in North Dakota
where we allocated 45% of our capital budget to continue development of
the Bakken and Three Forks zones. Our program was focused on improving
capital efficiencies through a reduction in well costs and increased
productivity. We continued to evolve our well completion design in
North Dakota throughout 2013 and through these changes and focused cost
management; we were able to deliver a 50% increase in the average 30
day initial production rate while still reducing total well costs by 8%
on average in 2013. The changes have driven a 40% improvement in
capital efficiencies year-over-year. We grew production from this
region by over 30% in 2013. We also added 25 MMBOE of 2P reserves at a
cost of $19.74 per BOE including future development capital. With an
average netback of approximately $53 per BOE in 2013, this delivered a
2.7x recycle ratio.
We continued to invest in the Marcellus throughout 2013, concentrating
our drilling activity within the most economic areas in northeastern
Pennsylvania. Well costs improved year-over-year decreasing by
approximately 20% through a combination of pad drilling and lower
costs. As well, production rates continued to exceed our expectations
throughout the year. A total of 9 net wells were drilled in 2013, with
13 net wells tied in and brought on-stream. Despite a widening of the
basis differentials in the region given constrained take-away capacity,
we continue to see robust economics from our drilling program. The
majority of our drilling activity was focused in Bradford, Susquehanna
and Sullivan counties with average 30 day initial production rates
increasing by approximately 60% year-over-year to almost 10 MMcf per
day in these counties. Production during the month of December averaged
170 MMcf per day of natural gas, driven by the acquisition of
additional working interests and the tie-in of 6 net wells in the
fourth quarter. Through our development and acquisition activities, we
added 411 Bcf of 2P reserves at a cost of $0.91 per Mcf including
future development capital. This reflects a 2.2x recycle ratio based
upon our average netback of $2.00 per Mcf from the Marcellus in 2013.
Our Marcellus production represents approximately 50% of both our
corporate natural gas volumes and our 2P natural gas reserves.
Our activities in Canada were predominately directed to our crude oil
waterflood projects where we advanced our enhanced oil recovery project
at Medicine Hat and continued with our drilling and optimization
programs at our Freda Lake, Pembina, and Giltedge properties. We also
drilled 4 net wells in the Wilrich and in the Duvernay, we drilled two
vertical wells, one horizontal re-entry and spud one horizontal well in
2013 to advance our understanding of these emerging plays.
RESERVES AND CONTINGENT RESOURCE ASSESSMENT:
Our total 2P reserves increased by over 17% year-over-year, driven by
significant reserve additions in the Marcellus and also in our
Bakken/Three Forks properties in North Dakota. At December 31, 2013,
Enerplus' independent reserve evaluators had assessed 406 million BOE
of 2P company interest reserves attributable to our asset base.
Additional information on our 2013 reserves can be found in our news
release dated February 3, 2014.
In addition to the 2P reserves, an assessment of the additional resource
potential within a portion of our asset base has identified 363 MMBOE
of economic, best estimate contingent resources ("contingent
resources") as of December 31, 2013. This quantity of contingent
resources is essentially unchanged from year-end 2012, despite
converting approximately 70 MMBOE of contingent resources to reserves.
Based upon our forecast production volumes for 2014, this would
represent approximately 10 years of organic reserve replacement
potential currently existing within a portion of our portfolio today.
Our contingent resource assessment includes:
-
39 MMBOE of contingent resources attributable to both the Bakken and
Three Forks at Fort Berthold. 18 MMBOE of previously assessed
contingent resources were converted to reserves in 2013 and 23 MMBOE of
new contingent resources were added primarily associated with the Three
Forks formation. This assessment assumes a well density of two wells
per drilling spacing unit within the Bakken and two wells per spacing
unit within the first bench of the Three Forks formation only. We
believe further upside potential may exist through both increased
drilling density and also drilling into the lower benches in the Three
Forks.
-
59 MMBOE of contingent resources attributable to improved oil recovery
("IOR") and enhanced oil recovery ("EOR") in our Canadian waterflood
assets. Approximately 4 MMBOE of previously assessed contingent
resources were converted to reserves in 2013.
-
1.3 Tcf of contingent resources associated with our Marcellus natural
gas assets. We added approximately 290 Bcf of contingent resources
associated with the acquisition of additional working interests and
reclassified 258 Bcf of contingent resources to reserves as a result of
our successful drilling activity.
-
253 Bcf of contingent resources associated with our Wilrich deep gas
assets in Canada. Approximately 30 Bcf of contingent resources were
reclassified to reserves in 2013 as a result of our successful drilling
activities.
At this time, there has been no assessment of the resource potential
within our Duvernay land position.
2014 Outlook
We expect to produce an average of 96,000 - 100,000 BOE/day in 2014, an
increase of 9% year-over-year or 8% per share using the mid-point of
this range. We expect continued growth from our U.S. oil properties at
Fort Berthold where we anticipate that average annual production will
increase by approximately 30% in 2014, driving our light crude oil
volumes to 67% of our total oil production. Total crude oil and natural
gas liquids production is expected to increase by approximately 12%.
Natural gas production is expected to increase by 7% averaging over 300
MMcf per day with the majority of the growth attributable to the
Marcellus. Our U.S. assets are anticipated to account for over 50% of
our corporate production volumes in 2014. The production mix is
expected to remain at approximately 48% crude oil and natural gas
liquids and 52% natural gas although continued outperformance in the
Marcellus could push the natural gas share higher.
The improvement in asset quality and operational performance along with
our focus on cost reductions and productivity enhancements has resulted
in a significant improvement in capital efficiencies across our
portfolio. We plan to build on these improvements in 2014 to deliver
another year of profitable growth complemented by a meaningful dividend
to our investors. Our plans include investing $760 million in capital
projects in 2014 with two thirds of our budget directed to oil projects
in North Dakota and in our Canadian waterfloods. The remainder of our
budget will be directed to our core natural gas assets in the Marcellus
and in the Deep Basin region as we move into development in the Wilrich
and continue to evaluate the Duvernay. Given that approximately 55% of
our planned capital spending is in the U.S., continued weakness in the
Canadian dollar could put upward pressure on our 2013 spending which is
reported in Canadian dollars, although it would also have a positive
effect on reported revenues.
Hedging Update
We continue to hedge a portion of our crude oil and natural gas
production in order to provide downside protection to our funds flow
estimates. As of February 4, 2014, we have swapped approximately 59%
of our net crude oil production for 2014, after royalties, at an
average price of US$94.02 per barrel. We also have downside protection
on approximately 40% of our forecasted natural gas production after
royalties for 2014. Full details on our hedging contracts are
contained within our 2013 Annual MD&A & Financial Statements which have
been filed on SEDAR and EDGAR.
Changes to Board of Directors
We are pleased to announce that Ms. Hilary Foulkes has joined the Board
of Directors of Enerplus. Ms. Foulkes has over 30 years of experience
within the Canadian oil and gas industry focused in the areas of
exploration, development and investment banking. She is a professional
geologist and earned a Bachelor of Science (Honours, Earth Sciences)
from the University of Waterloo.
Live Conference Call
Ian C. Dundas, President and CEO, will host a conference call today,
February 21, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. MT (11:00 a.m. ET) to discuss these
results. Details of the conference call are as follows:
To ensure timely participation in the conference call, callers are
encouraged to dial in 15 minutes prior to the start time to register
for the event. A podcast of the conference call will also be available
on our website for downloading following the event. A telephone replay
will be available for 30 days following the conference call and can be
accessed at the following numbers:
Dial-In:
|
|
|
416-849-0833
|
|
|
|
1-855-859-2056 (toll free)
|
Passcode:
|
|
|
58756618
|
Electronic copies of our 2013 year-end MD&A and Financial Statements,
along with other public information including investor presentations,
are available on our website at www.enerplus.com. For further information, please contact Investor Relations at
1-800-319-6462 or email investorrelations@enerplus.com.
Follow @EnerplusCorp on Twitter at https://twitter.com/EnerplusCorp.
INFORMATION REGARDING RESERVES, RESOURCES AND OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Currency and Accounting Principles
All amounts in this news release are stated in Canadian dollars unless
otherwise specified. All financial information in this news release has
been prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except as
noted below under "Non-GAAP Measures".
Barrels of Oil Equivalent
This news release also contains references to "BOE" (barrels of oil
equivalent). Enerplus has adopted the standard of six thousand cubic
feet of gas to one barrel of oil (6 Mcf: 1 bbl) when converting natural
gas to BOEs. BOEs may be misleading, particularly if used in
isolation. The foregoing conversion ratios are based on an energy
equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip
and do not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that
the value ratio based on the current price of oil as compared to
natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalent of
6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading. "MBOE"
and "MMBOE" mean "thousand barrels of oil equivalent" and "million
barrels of oil equivalent", respectively.
Presentation of Production and Reserves Information
Under U.S. GAAP oil and gas sales are generally presented net of
royalties and U.S. industry protocol is to present production volumes
net of royalties. Under IFRS and Canadian industry protocol oil and
gas sales and production volumes are presented on a gross basis before
deduction of royalties. In order to continue to be comparable with
our Canadian peer companies, the summary results contained within this
news release presents our production and BOE measures on a before
royalty company interest basis.
All production volumes and revenues presented herein are reported on a
"company interest" basis, before deduction of Crown and other
royalties, plus Enerplus' royalty interest. Unless otherwise specified,
all reserves volumes in this news release (and all information derived
therefrom) are based on "company interest reserves" using forecast
prices and costs. "Company interest reserves" consist of "gross
reserves" (as defined in NI 51-101), being Enerplus' working interest
before deduction of any royalties), plus Enerplus' royalty interests in
reserves. "Company interest reserves" are not a measure defined in NI
51-101 and do not have a standardized meaning under NI 51-101.
Accordingly, our company interest reserves may not be comparable to
reserves presented or disclosed by other issuers. Our oil and gas
reserves statement for the year ended December 31, 2013, which will
include complete disclosure of our oil and gas reserves and other oil
and gas information in accordance with NI 51-101, is contained within
our Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013 ("our AIF") which is available on our website at www.enerplus.com and under our SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com. Additionally, our AIF forms part of our Form 40-F that is filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and is available on EDGAR
at www.sec.gov. Readers are also urged to review the Management's Discussion &
Analysis and financial statements filed on SEDAR and as part of our
Form 40-F on EDGAR concurrently with this news release for more
complete disclosure on our operations.
Contingent Resource Estimates
This news release contains estimates of "contingent resources".
"Contingent resources" are not, and should not be confused with, oil
and gas reserves. "Contingent resources" are defined in the Canadian
Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (the "COGE Handbook") as "those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to
be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established
technology or technology under development, but which are not currently
considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more
contingencies. Contingencies may include factors such as ultimate
recovery rates, legal, environmental, political and regulatory matters
or a lack of markets. It is also appropriate to classify as "contingent
resources" the estimated discovered recoverable quantities associated
with a project in the early evaluation stage. All of our contingent
resource estimates are economic using established technologies and
under current commodity price assumptions used by our independent
reserve evaluators. Enerplus expects to develop these contingent
resources in the coming years however it is too early in their
development for these resources to be classified as reserves at this
time. There is no certainty that we will produce any portion of the
volumes currently classified as "contingent resources". The "contingent
resource" estimates contained herein are presented as the "best
estimate" of the quantity that will actually be recovered, effective as
of December 31, 2013. A "best estimate" of contingent resources means
that it is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities
recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate, and if
probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50%
probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed
the best estimate.
For additional information regarding the primary contingencies which
currently prevent the classification of our disclosed "contingent
resources" associated with our Marcellus shale gas properties, our Fort
Berthold properties, our Wilrich natural gas properties and a portion
of our Canadian crude oil properties as reserves and the positive and
negative factors relevant to the "contingent resource" estimates, see
our AIF, a copy of which is available under our SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com, and our Form 40-F, a copy of which is available under our EDGAR
profile at www.sec.gov.
See "Non-GAAP Measures" below.
NOTICE TO U.S. READERS
The oil and natural gas reserves information contained in this news
release has generally been prepared in accordance with Canadian
disclosure standards, which are not comparable in all respects to
United States or other foreign disclosure standards. Reserves
categories such as "proved reserves" and "probable reserves" may be
defined differently under Canadian requirements than the definitions
contained in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC") rules. In addition, under Canadian disclosure requirements and
industry practice, reserves and production are reported using gross
(or, as noted above, "company interest") volumes, which are volumes
prior to deduction of royalty and similar payments. The practice in the
United States is to report reserves and production using net volumes,
after deduction of applicable royalties and similar payments. Canadian
disclosure requirements require that forecasted commodity prices be
used for reserves evaluations, while the SEC mandates the use of an
average of first day of the month price for the 12 months prior to the
end of the reporting period. Additionally, the SEC prohibits
disclosure of oil and gas resources in SEC filings, whereas Canadian
issuers may disclose oil and gas resources. Resources are different
than, and should not be construed as reserves. For a description of the
definition of, and the risks and uncertainties surrounding the
disclosure of, contingent resources, see "Information Regarding
Reserves, Resources and Operational Information" above.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND STATEMENTS
This news release contains certain forward-looking information and
statements ("forward-looking information") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of
the words "expect", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "guidance",
"objective", "ongoing", "may", "will", "project", "should", "believe",
"plans", "intends", "budget", "strategy" and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking information. In particular, but
without limiting the foregoing, this news release contains
forward-looking information pertaining to the following: Enerplus'
asset portfolio; future capital and development expenditures and the
allocation thereof among our assets; future development and drilling
locations, plans and costs; the performance of and future results from
Enerplus' assets and operations, including anticipated production
levels, expected ultimate recoveries and decline rates; future growth
prospects, acquisitions and dispositions; the volumes and estimated
value of Enerplus' oil and gas reserves and contingent resource volumes
and future commodity price and foreign exchange rate assumptions
related thereto; the life of Enerplus' reserves; future funds flow and
debt-to-funds flow levels; potential asset acquisitions and
dispositions; rates of return on Enerplus' capital program; Enerplus'
tax position; sources of funding of Enerplus' capital program; and
future costs, expenses and royalty rates.
The forward-looking information contained in this news release reflects
several material factors and expectations and assumptions of Enerplus
including, without limitation: that Enerplus will conduct its
operations and achieve results of operations as anticipated; that
Enerplus' development plans will achieve the expected results; the
general continuance of current or, where applicable, assumed industry
conditions; the continuation of assumed tax, royalty and regulatory
regimes; the accuracy of the estimates of Enerplus' reserve and
resource volumes; commodity price and cost assumptions; the continued
availability of adequate debt and/or equity financing, cash flow and
other sources to fund Enerplus' capital and operating requirements as
needed; and the extent of its liabilities. Enerplus believes the
material factors, expectations and assumptions reflected in the
forward-looking information are reasonable but no assurance can be
given that these factors, expectations and assumptions will prove to be
correct.
The forward-looking information included in this news release is not a
guarantee of future performance and should not be unduly relied upon.
Such information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ
materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking information
including, without limitation: changes in commodity prices; changes in
realized prices for Enerplus' products; changes in the demand for or
supply of Enerplus' products; unanticipated operating results, results
from development plans or production declines; changes in tax or
environmental laws, royalty rates or other regulatory matters; changes
in development plans by Enerplus or by third party operators of
Enerplus' properties; increased debt levels or debt service
requirements; inaccurate estimation of Enerplus' oil and gas reserves
and resources volumes; limited, unfavourable or a lack of access to
capital markets; increased costs; a lack of adequate insurance
coverage; the impact of competitors; reliance on industry partners; and
certain other risks detailed from time to time in Enerplus' public
disclosure documents (including, without limitation, those risks
identified in our AIF and Form 40-F described above).
The purpose of certain financial outlook information included in this
news release, including with respect to our 2014 guidance for funds
flow, is to communicate our current expectations as to our performance
in 2014. Readers are cautioned that it may not be appropriate for
other purposes. The forward-looking information contained in this news
release speaks only as of the date of this news release, and none of
Enerplus or its subsidiaries assume any obligation to publicly update
or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be
required pursuant to applicable laws.
NON-GAAP MEASURES
In this news release, we use the terms "funds flow", "adjusted payout
ratio", "capital efficiency", "recycle ratio" and "netback" as measures
to analyze operating performance, leverage and liquidity. "Funds flow"
is calculated as net cash generated from operating activities but
before changes in non-cash operating working capital and asset
retirement obligation expenditures. "Adjusted payout ratio" is
calculated as cash dividends to shareholders, net of our stock
dividends and DRIP proceeds, plus capital spending (including office
capital) divided by funds flow. "Capital efficiency" is calculated as
the change in production from the fourth quarter of the previous year
to the fourth quarter of the current year divided by total capital
expenditures from the fourth quarter of the previous year up to and
including the third quarter of the current year. "Netback" is
calculated as oil and gas revenues after deducting royalties, operating
costs and transportation expenses. A "recycle ratio" is calculated as
finding and development costs divided by operating netback.
Enerplus believes that, in addition to net earnings and other measures
prescribed by U.S. GAAP, the terms "funds flow", "adjusted payout
ratio", "capital efficiency", "netback" and "recycle ratio" are useful
supplemental measures as they provide an indication of the results
generated by Enerplus' principal business activities. However, these
measures are not measures recognized by U.S. GAAP and do not have a
standardized meaning prescribed by U.S.GAAP. Therefore, these measures,
as defined by Enerplus, may not be comparable to similar measures
presented by other issuers.
Ian C. Dundas
President & Chief Executive Officer
Enerplus Corporation
SOURCE Enerplus Corporation