Retail stocks have been annihilated recently, despite the economy eking out growth. The fundamentals of the retail business look
horrible: Sales are stagnating and profitability is getting worse with every passing quarter.
Jeff Bezos and Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) get most of the credit, but this credit is misplaced. Today, online sales
represent only 8.5 percent of total retail sales. Amazon, at $80 billion in sales, accounts only for 1.5 percent of total U.S.
retail sales, which at the end of 2016 were around $5.5 trillion. Though it is human nature to look for the simplest explanation,
in truth, the confluence of a half-dozen unrelated developments is responsible for weak retail sales.
Our consumption needs and preferences have changed significantly. Ten years ago we spent a pittance on cellphones. Today Apple
sells roughly $100 billion worth of i-goods in the U.S., and about two-thirds of those sales are iPhones. Apple,
Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) U.S. market share is about 44
percent, thus the total smart mobile phone market in the U.S. is $150 billion a year. Add spending on smartphone accessories
(cases, cables, glass protectors, etc.) and we are probably looking at $200 billion total spending a year on smartphones and
accessories.
Ten years ago (before the introduction of the iPhone) smartphone sales were close to zero. Nokia Oyj (ADR)
(NYSE: NOK) was the king of dumb phones, with sales in the U.S.
in 2006 of $4 billion. The total dumb cellphone handset market in the U.S. in 2006 was probably closer to $10 billion.
Consumer income has not changed much since 2006, thus over the last 10 years $190 billion in consumer spending was diverted
toward mobile phones.
It gets more interesting. In 2006 a cellphone was a luxury only affordable by adults, but today 7-year-olds have iPhones. Our
phone bill per household more than doubled over the last decade. Not to bore you with too many data points, but Verizon
Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) revenue in 2006 was $38
billion. Fast-forward 10 years and it is $89 billion — a $51 billion increase. Verizon’s market share is about 30 percent, thus the
total spending increase on wireless services is close to $150 billion.
Between phones and their services, this is $340 billion that will not be spent on T-shirts and shoes.
But we are not done. The combination of mid-single-digit health-care inflation and the proliferation of high-deductible plans
has increased consumer direct health-care costs and further chipped away at our discretionary dollars. Health-care spending in the
U.S. is $3.3 trillion, and just 3 percent of that figure is almost $100 billion.
Then there are soft, hard-to-quantify factors. Millennials and millennial-want-to-be generations (speaking for myself here)
don’t really care about clothes as much as we may have 10 years ago. After all, our high-tech billionaires wear hoodies and
flip-flops to work. Lack of fashion sense did not hinder their success, so why should the rest of us care about the dress code?
In the ’90s casual Fridays were a big deal – yippee, we could wear jeans to work! Fast-forward 20 years, and every day is
casual. Suits? They are worn to job interviews or to impress old-fashioned clients. Consumer habits have slowly changed, and we now
put less value on clothes (and thus spend less money on them) and more value on having the latest iThing.
All this brings us to a hard and sad reality: The U.S. is over-retailed. We simply have too many stores. Americans have four or
five times more square footage per capita than other developed countries. This bloated square footage was created for a different
consumer, the one who in in the ’90s and ’00s was borrowing money against her house and spending it at her local shopping mall.
Today’s post-Great Recession consumer is deleveraging, paying off her debt, spending money on new necessities such as mobile
phones, and paying more for the old ones such as health care.
Yes, Amazon and online sales do matter. Ten years ago only 2.5 percent of retail sales took place online, and today that number
is 8.5 percent – about a $300 billion change. Some of these online sales were captured by brick-and-mortar online sales, some by
e-commerce giants like Amazon, and some by brands selling directly to consumers.
But as you can see, online sales are just one piece of a very complex retail puzzle. All the aforementioned factors combined
explain why, when gasoline prices declined by almost 50 percent (gifting consumers hundreds of dollars of discretionary spending a
month), retailers’ profitability and consumer spending did not flinch – those savings were more than absorbed by other
expenses.
Understanding that online sales (when we say this we really mean Amazon) are not the only culprit responsible for horrible
retail numbers is crucial in the analysis of retail stocks. If you are only solving “who can fight back the best against Amazon?”
you are only solving for one variable in a multivariable problem: – Consumers’ habits have changed; the U.S. is over-retailed; and
consumer spending is being diverted to different parts of the economy.
As value investors we are naturally attracted to hated sectors. However, we demand a much greater margin of safety from retail
stocks, because estimating their future cash flows (and thus fair value) is becoming increasingly difficult. Warren Buffett has
said that you want to own a business that can be run by an idiot, because one day it will be. A successful retail business in
today’s world cannot be run by by an idiot. It requires Bezos-like qualities: being totally consumer-focused, taking risks,
thinking long term.
© 2017 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.