TORONTO, June 18, 2018 /CNW/ - Sierra Metals Inc. (TSX:
SMT) (BVL: SMT) (NYSE AMERICAN: SMTS) ("Sierra Metals" or "the Company") is pleased to report the results of a Preliminary
Economic Assessment ("PEA") regarding the Company's Cusi Mine, located in Chihuahua State, Mexico. The PEA is based on technical inputs from various independent consulting groups, including; SRK,
Redco, Anddes, Kappes Cassiday and Flopac.
Based on the technical work from the various independent consultants, the PEA was compiled under National Instrument 43-101
standards by Mining Plus Peru SAC. The full technical report will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release.
Highlights of the PEA include:
- After-tax Net Present Value (NPV): US$92.2Million at an 8% discount rate
- After-tax Internal Rate of Return (IRR): 75%
- After-tax Payback Period: 4.6 years
- Life of Mine Capital Cost: US$104.5 Million
- Net After-tax Cash Flow: US$150.6 Million
- Total Operating Unit Cost: US$41.36/tonne
- Plant Processing Rate: Currently 650 tonnes per day (TPD) growing to 1,200 TPD by Q1 2019 and 2,700 TPD by mid-2021.
- Average Silver Recovery Rate 87%
- Mine Life: 9 years based on existing Mineral Resource Estimate
- Life of Mine Silver Production: 30 Million Ounces
Igor Gonzales, President and CEO of Sierra Metals commented: "The Company is very encouraged
by the results of this PEA as they support the plan to profitably develop and grow the Cusi Mine in sustainable and staged steps
from 650 TPD currently, to 1,200 TPD by Q1 2019, and further, to 2,700 TPD in 2021 based on consensus metal pricing.
Cusi will move to declare Mineral Reserves at the Mine, and this PEA represents the first step in that process. The
Company is incorporating an aggressive Capex program into the PEA of US$11.5 million over the life
of the mine, which includes exploration drilling to increase the mineral resources at Cusi as well as convert the existing
resources to reserves. Additionally, the PEA reflects an aggressive development program designed to open a mineable reserve at
depth and on strike. The Opex reflects yearly production development, definition drilling programs, and other operational
costs.
The current study focuses on the current Mineral Resource reported in the 43-101 Technical Report filed on February 12, 2018 and does not include any drilling completed after August 31,
2017. The Company is continuing with its successful brownfield exploration programs and expects to continue to grow the
mineral resources at the Cusi Mine this year. We believe that this expansion not only provides additional value to the
company, as the PEA quantifies, but could also leverage the value of future resource additions. New silver ounce discoveries
would be incorporated into production plans earlier than if the Company maintained current capacity levels."
He concluded, "We are continuing with our strategy to increase shareholder value and grow the reserve and resource base at
the Company. We successfully completed brownfield exploration programs at all three mines and increased the mineral reserves and
resources during the past two years. Additionally, we implemented a successful operational improvement program in Peru and have completed an effective turn-around program in Mexico, and we
have already seen returns on this well-spent capital. Building upon these successes, we are working to complete, in addition to
the Cusi PEA, scoping studies at both the Yauricocha and Bolvar Mines, which will maximize value and profitability through the
implementation of automation and possible throughput increases which will further drive growth and benefit all shareholders in
the future."
Mineral Resource Estimate
The Property is in the Cusihuarachi District of Chihuahua State, Mexico, approximately 135 km
southwest of Chihuahua City. Epithermal mineralization has been mined in the area since its discovery in the early 1800's.
Mineralization is bound between regionally significant northwest trending faults; Eight mineralized zones are recognized at the
property, mineralized zones are up to 10 meters across and include; silicified faults, veins, and breccias. Seven epithermal
veins are recognized at the property, veins typically range between 0.5 and 2.0 meters wide, dip steeply, extend 100 to 200
meters along strike, and extend up to 400 meters depth. Vein orientations range between northeast and northwest.
This PEA considers depleted measured, indicated and inferred resources reported on February 12,
2018, by SRK and effective as of August 31st, 2017. These resources are not demonstrated to
be economically viable. The results of this PEA are indicative of conceptual potential and are not definitive.
Table 1-1: Summary of resource reported by SRK, February 12, 2018 (Effective
August 31, 2017)
Class
|
Area
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Pb
(%)
|
Zn
(%)
|
Tonnes
(000's)
|
Measured
|
SRL
|
268
|
225
|
0.13
|
0.55
|
0.68
|
362
|
Measured
|
268
|
225
|
0.13
|
0.55
|
0.68
|
362
|
Indicated
|
Promontorio
|
241
|
213
|
0.08
|
0.37
|
0.44
|
1097
|
Indicated
|
Eduwiges
|
293
|
198
|
0.26
|
1.35
|
1.32
|
928
|
Indicated
|
SRL
|
296
|
242
|
0.32
|
0.62
|
0.64
|
1435
|
Indicated
|
San Nicolas
|
195
|
176
|
0.13
|
0.21
|
0.22
|
414
|
Indicated
|
San Juan
|
208
|
189
|
0.13
|
0.2
|
0.21
|
121
|
Indicated
|
Minerva
|
222
|
198
|
0.4
|
0.09
|
0.05
|
57
|
Indicated
|
Candelaria
|
386
|
366
|
0.14
|
0.17
|
0.28
|
46
|
Indicated
|
Durana
|
224
|
219
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
0.02
|
97
|
Indicated
|
267
|
217
|
0.21
|
0.64
|
0.66
|
4195
|
Inferred
|
Promontorio
|
218
|
185
|
0.1
|
0.35
|
0.62
|
308
|
Inferred
|
Eduwiges
|
229
|
115
|
0.09
|
1.78
|
1.79
|
147
|
Inferred
|
SRL
|
216
|
158
|
0.22
|
0.55
|
1.04
|
658
|
Inferred
|
San Nicolas
|
181
|
161
|
0.14
|
0.21
|
0.23
|
340
|
Inferred
|
San Juan
|
200
|
186
|
0.04
|
0.15
|
0.27
|
44
|
Inferred
|
Minerva
|
149
|
143
|
0.05
|
0.08
|
0.06
|
5
|
Inferred
|
Candelaria
|
185
|
125
|
0.16
|
0.62
|
1.17
|
128
|
Inferred
|
Durana
|
124
|
115
|
0.01
|
0.17
|
0.09
|
3
|
Inferred
|
207
|
158
|
0.16
|
0.54
|
0.84
|
1633
|
(1)
|
Mineral resources are reported inclusive of ore reserves. Mineral resources
are not ore reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All figures rounded to reflect the relative accuracy
of the estimates. Gold, silver, lead and zinc assays were capped where appropriate.
|
(2)
|
Mineral resources are reported at a single cut-off grade of 105 g/t AgEq
based on metal price assumptions*, metallurgical recovery assumptions, mining costs (US$29.41/t), processing costs
(US$18.3/t), and general and administrative costs (US$3.74/t).
|
*
|
Metal price assumptions considered for the calculation of the cut-off grade
and equivalency are: Silver (Ag): US$/oz 18.30, Lead (US$/LB 0.93), Zinc (US$/lb. 1.15) and Gold (US$/oz
1,283.00).
|
|
The resources were estimated by SRK. Giovanny Ortiz, B.Sc., PGeo,
FAusIMM #304612 of SRK, a Qualified Person, performed the resource calculations for the Cusi Mine.
|
**
|
Based on the historical production information of Cusi, the metallurgical
recovery assumptions are: 84% Ag, 57% Au, 86% Pb, 51% Zn.
|
Note: Mining has continued since the publication of this resource and resources have not been subsequently
depleted.
Sierra Metals commissioned various specialist groups (Table 1-2) to evaluate how, on a conceptual level, mining, mineral
processing, and tailings management could be adapted at the property to achieve a sustainable and staged increase in mine
production and mill throughput from 650 TPD, to 1,200 TPD by Q1 2019, and 2,700 TPD by mid-2021.
Table 1-2: Groups involved in development for conceptual plan considered in the PEA
Group
|
Concept
|
Report
|
SRK Consulting (U.S), Inc.
|
Resource Estimation
|
SRK, 2017
|
Redco Mining Consultants
|
Increase mine output to 2,700 TPS
|
Redco, 2018
|
Sierra Metals (SM)
|
Increase Mal Paso Plant Capacity to 1,200 TPD
|
Sierra, 2018
|
Ingenieria Carillo (IC)
|
Engineering associated with increased Mal Paso plant capacity
|
|
Kappes Cassiday and Associates (KCA)
|
Preliminary design of 1,500 TPD plant at
Cusihuariachi
|
KCA, 2018
|
Anddes Consulting (AC)
|
Expansion of tailings storage capacity
|
Anddes, 2018
|
Flopac
|
Tailings Storage up to Q1-2020
|
Flopac
|
Mining Methodology
To determine how mine output could be increased, Sierra Metals commissioned Redco Mining Consultants ("Redco') to undertake a
scoping study, considering; existing development and infrastructure, geotechnical characteristics, geological controls and
mineralization style. The study (Redco, 2018) determined that mechanized bench and fill mining could be used to achieve
sustainable production of 2,700 TPD. Improved productivity would be associated with improved safety as the requirement for man
time spent in stopes is significantly reduced.
Head-grades are expected to reduce from the current 201 g/t Ag to 161 g/t Ag @ 1,200 TPD and 145 g/t Ag @ (2,700 TPD). Redco
estimates that a US$104.5 million capital investment throughout the life of mine is required to
mechanize the Cusi Mine and achieve a 2,700 TPD production rate.
As part of their scoping study, Redco considered plans for ventilation and dewatering on a very general scale. Sierra Metals
recognize that further and more detailed ventilation and dewatering plans are required to support the overall conceptual mine
design.
Mineral Processing
The Mal Paso Plant, located 44 kilometers from the Cusi Mine, uses a conventional crushing-milling-flotation circuit to
recover mineral and to produce commercial quality Lead/Silver and Zinc concentrates. Mineral is delivered from the mine to the
plant in 20-tonne trucks.
Mineral processing and the recovery of the mineral is demonstrated, and silver recoveries are established at 87%.
The Mal Paso Plant increased throughput from 450 TPD at the beginning of 2018 to 650 TPD currently. In line with proposed
increases in mine output, the processing capacity at Mal Paso will increase to 1,200 TPD in 2019, and a new plant with a capacity
of 1,500 TPD is proposed at Cusihuariachi, to come online mid-2021 which would bring total capacity to 2,700 TPD.
The Company undertook an internal review to determine how the Mal Paso plant could be adjusted to increase throughput to 1,200
TPD. This study identified bottlenecks in the existing plant, how to overcome these bottlenecks, and how to achieve the desired
throughput at Mal Paso. Sierra Metals have begun to purchase the pieces of equipment and project that the remaining pieces of
equipment will be purchased and installed before Q1 2019.
An independent processing plant of 1,500 TPD, operating complementarily to Mal Paso which currently runs at 650 TPD with
planned growth to 1,200 TPD by Q1 2019, will be required to process 2,700 TPD. Sierra Metals commissioned Kappes Cassiday and
Associates (KCA) to produce a conceptual design for a modular plant to process 1,500 TPD at Cusihuariachi from mid-2021. The
modular plant is designed to be easily scalable in 1,500 TPD increments.
The proposed plant at Cusihuariachi is significantly closer to the Cusi Mine than the Mal Paso Plant, KCA estimate that this
would translate to an operational saving of US$4/tonne. A further saving of US$1/tonne, related to mineral processing, is envisaged by KCA. This combined US$5/tonne operational saving, the equivalent of US$2.7 million/year. (i.e. 1,500
TPD x 360 days x US$5/tonne) would be offset against projected Capital requirements of US$30 million.
Tailings Capacity
Tailings produced at Mal Paso are currently stored in two conventional tailings storage facilities. As of February 2018, planned and permitted raises to existing tailings facilities would provide 520,000 cubic meters
of storage capacity, the equivalent of one year and seven months storage at a production rate of 1,200 TPD.
Sierra Metals recognize that increasing tailings storage capacity is critical to achieving and sustaining increased rates of
production.
At the new Cusihuriachi site, Anddes Consulting (AC) has evaluated the merits of nine new potential tailings storage
facilities as identified by Sierra Metals. Also, at the Mal Paso site, a further four sites were reviewed and based on
preliminary work these sites are undergoing more detailed evaluation ahead of final selection and detailed engineering. The four
sites at Mal Paso offer varying storage capacities between 600,000 cubic meters and 2.5 million cubic meters.
The proposed plant at Cusihuariachi would require the development of a new tailings facility separate from those used at Mal
Paso. A potential site for a dry-stack (>75% solids) tailings storage facility has been identified and is undergoing
preliminary investigations. Conceptually, the identified site would provide storage for 5.4 million tonnes of tailings, the
equivalent of 11 years capacity operating at 1,500 TPD.
Economic Analysis
The PEA calculates a Base Case after-tax NPV of US$92.2 million, with an after-tax IRR of 75%
using a discount rate of 8%. The total life of mine capital cost of the project is estimated to total US$104.5 million. The payback period for the Life of Mine (LoM) capital is
estimated at 4.6 years. Operating costs of the life of mine total US$259.3 million, equating to an
operating cost of US$41.36 per tonne milled.
PEA Highlights
Base case of $1,283/oz Gold, $18.30/oz Silver, $0.93/lb. Lead, $1.15/lb.
Zinc
|
Unit
|
Value
|
Net Present Value (After Tax 8% Discount Rate)
|
US$ M
|
92.2
|
Internal Rate of Return
|
IRR
|
75%
|
Mill Feed
|
Tonnes (Mt)
|
6.27
|
Peak Mining Production Rate
|
t/year
|
972,000
|
LOM Project Operating Period
|
Years
|
9
|
Total Life of Mine (LoM) Capital Costs
|
US$ M
|
104.5
|
Net After – Tax Cashflow
|
US$ M
|
150.6
|
Total Operating Unit Costs
|
US$/t
|
41.36
|
LOM Gold Production (Payable)
|
Oz
|
19,706
|
LOM Silver Production (Payable)
|
MOz
|
30
|
LOM Lead Production (Payable)
|
t
|
28,256
|
LOM Zinc Production (Payable)
|
t
|
19,160
|
Quality Control
All technical data contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by:
Gordon Babcock, P.Eng., Chief Operating Officer and a Qualified Person under National
Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
Americo Zuzunaga, MAusIMM CP (Mining Engineer) and Vice President of Corporate Planning is a
Qualified Person and chartered professional qualifying as a Competent Person under the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC)
Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.
Augusto Chung, FAusIMM CP (Metallurgist) and Consultant to Sierra Metals is a Qualified Person
and chartered professional qualifying as a Competent Person on metallurgical processes.
About Sierra Metals
Sierra Metals Inc. is Canadian based growing polymetallic mining company with production from its Yauricocha Mine in
Peru, and its Bolivar and Cusi Mines in Mexico. The Company is focused on increasing production volume and growing mineral resources. Sierra Metals
has recently had several new key discoveries and still has many more exciting brownfield exploration opportunities at all three
Mines in Peru and Mexico that are within close proximity to the
existing mines. Additionally, the Company also has large land packages at all three mines with several prospective regional
targets providing longer-term exploration upside and mineral resource growth potential.
The Company's Common Shares trade on the Bolsa de Valores de Lima and on the Toronto Stock
Exchange under the symbol "SMT" and on the NYSE American Exchange under the symbol "SMTS."
Continue to Follow, Like and Watch our progress:
Web: www.sierrametals.com | Twitter:
sierrametals | Facebook: SierraMetalsInc | LinkedIn: Sierra Metals Inc
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains "forward-looking information" and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Canadian and
U.S. securities laws related to the Company (collectively, "forward-looking information"). Forward-looking information includes,
but is not limited to, statements with respect to the Company's operations, including the anticipated developments in the
Company's operations in future periods, the Company's planned exploration activities, the adequacy of the Company's financial
resources, and other events or conditions that may occur in the future. Statements concerning mineral reserve and resource
estimates may also be considered to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the
mineralization that will be encountered if and when the properties are developed or further developed. These statements relate to
analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and
assumptions of management. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs,
plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such
as "expects", "anticipates", "plans", "projects", "estimates", "assumes", "intends", "strategy", "goals", "objectives",
"potential" or variations thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will"
be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical
fact and may be forward-looking information.
Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual events or results to
differ from those reflected in the forward-looking information, including, without limitation, risks inherent in the mining
industry including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected geological formations, floods, labour
disruptions, explosions, cave-ins, weather conditions and criminal activity; commodity price fluctuations; higher operating
and/or capital costs; lack of available infrastructure; the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results
will not be consistent with the Company's expectations; risks associated with the estimation of mineral resources and the
geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits and the inability to replace reserves; fluctuations in the price of commodities
used in the Company's operations; risks related to foreign operations; changes in laws or policies, foreign taxation, delays or
the inability to obtain necessary governmental permits; risks relating to outstanding borrowings; issues regarding title to the
Company's properties; risks related to environmental regulation; litigation risks; risks related to uninsured hazards; the impact
of competition; volatility in the price of the Company's securities; global financial risks; inability to attract or retain
qualified employees; potential conflicts of interest; risks related to a controlling group of shareholders; dependence on third
parties; differences in U.S. and Canadian reporting of mineral reserves and resources; potential dilutive transactions; foreign
currency risks; risks related to business cycles; liquidity risks; reliance on internal control systems; credit risks, including
risks related to the Company's compliance with covenants with respect to its BCP Facility; uncertainty of production and cost
estimates for the Yauricocha Mine, the Bolivar Mine and the Cusi Mine; and other risks identified in the Company's filings with
Canadian securities regulators and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), which filings are available at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively.
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company's forward-looking information. Forward-looking
information includes statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and the Company's actual achievements or other
future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information due to a variety of
risks, uncertainties and other factors. The Company's statements containing forward-looking information are based on the beliefs,
expectations, and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and the Company does not assume any obligation to
update forward-looking information if circumstances or management's beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, other than
as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, one should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
information.
Note Regarding Reserve and Resource Estimates
All reserve and resource estimates reported by the Company are calculated in accordance with the Canadian National Instrument
43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Classification
system. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC. The differences between these standards are
discussed in our SEC filings. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sierra-metals-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-results-for-a-315-output-expansion-at-its-cusi-mine-in-mexico-yielding-a-75-internal-rate-of-return-300667523.html
SOURCE Sierra Metals Inc.
View original content: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/June2018/18/c3846.html