Alabama Graphite Corp. Com ABGPF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Proper Valuation and exchange

[Realist2018]

Well, there is no “hole”, just an inferred resource.  It’s low-grade, and forecast production costs are higher than current market prices.  However it’s not “worthless”, at least no more so than WWR’s long-held uranium resources which are also waiting prices higher than their development and production costs.  So are many other deposits of copper, gold, zinc, etc held by juniors and majors. 
 
In my opinion, CSPG’s closely guarded technology to process common flake graphite into high-value cspg offers significant value if PEA assumptions hold and world flake graphite supplies continue to be readily available and low-cost.  Going forward, WWR is not confined to the mine-based path of NI43-101 and by procuring lower-cost, third-party graphite amenable to CSPG’s clorination technology WWR might de-link the time and capital needed to develop its own mine from the value-added aspects of the PEA.  As described, concentrate processing takes place in a fully separate (off-mine site) facility; and it makes all the money. 
 
I believe that’s why WWR would invest.  As for the negativity, blame the merger-at-a-discount and WWR not yet unleashing a promotion, either on its lithium plays or on its graphite plans.   Obviously, a WWR $2/share price by March 30 would have everyone more positive.