RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Monday Monday MondayDo you even hear yourself sometimes? Yes. I'm on the companies payroll. They pay people to scour stockhouse and post the same things over and over for hours on end sometimes... Oh wait, does that mean you're on payroll too? Can we hang out and have lunch dates too? Get a grip.
This whole woe is the shorter lets call people paid shills thing is so elementary. Suddenly all the forums are crowded with new aliases who've come to voice their anger, who for years hadnt said a peep. You guys we're clever, at least you ramped up posting a month or two before the campaign.
Bravo Starfish and crew. Bravo.
Your psychological jedi mind tricks have been well honed over the years.
I suppose theres no need to update the playbook after all, just keep hammering, trigger stop losses, hammer, stop losses.
rad10 wrote: It's fairly obvious that you are on the payroll towering. What were you blathering about seafood and starfish for?
Please explain.
Toweringmars wrote: Not worried. Guess we'll see. KeyserShoze wrote: Some key words.... "supposing this", "then what?" "what if", "if the company", "what would happen", "If they didnt", "would you?"... Those are many hypotheticals all wrapped up into one miracle pump hypothetical. Seems like a slam dunk to me.
Toweringmars wrote: Hypothetical here, but supposing this gets financed, then they announce that they've turned cashflow positive. Then what? What if the re-negotiate some of the debentures and extend them a year or two away like Auxly and Supreme did? While converting some of them at a lower level? If the company offloaded some of its current debt load, and hit profitability, what would happen then? If they didn't need to raise, and the shorts had no way of covering their predatory positions, what then? Would you still fight it, or do you cover and walk away? Curious to know.
Larbro wrote: Sorry to hear this....you must be in a position to throw money out the window......