RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Instututional ownershipGoBlue2016 wrote: puffdragon699 wrote: GoBlue2016 wrote: Puff
big boys insist on fundamentals. They use a Risk Adjusted Return model. Too much volatility and risk for them. And fundamentals are probably 2 year ends away of not three.
GoBlue
puffdragon699 wrote: puffdragon699 wrote: I had a quick look and it appears ONLY,approx 2% of shares owned by institutions ,approx 80% by Manulife.
I wonder when Manulife rebalances their portfolio's?
Interesting.Manulife are the largest institutional owners of WEED and ACB as well.They too have VERY LOW institutional ownership.
What does that tell you about what the "big boys" think of the sector's current valuation?
Should one follow the "big boys" or the "small fry" ?
Exactly!
Makes me wonder why anyone would want to be a "long" whilst so risky.........
The big guys are like NFL coaches on 4th down and short on the 50 yard line. Ain't' going to take the risk despite what game theory dictates.
They have shareholders they they have to answer to. Quarterly performance review on portfolio.
GoBlue
Thanks Blue.Appeciate your honesty re.the high risks involved and why the "big boys" don't want to roll the dice.Too risky indeedy.
Better to stick to the casino if one is looking for a potential quickie reward with high risk.At least you get cocktails thrown in !