Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Antrim Energy Inc. ATGYF

"Antrim Energy Inc was incorporated on September 29, 1999 in Canada. The Company is engaged in the business of oil and natural gas acquisition, exploration, development and production in international locations. The Company, through its subsidiaries, conducts exploration activities in the United Kingdom and Ireland."


OTCPK:ATGYF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Bigbadoilon Jan 24, 2008 10:33am
299 Views
Post# 14253904

RE: The big picture, P10 will go to P50 in 2010

RE: The big picture, P10 will go to P50 in 2010Good points Big John.Especially the point that AEN only needs enough reserves to make an economic project so they can finance it. As i have been posting on the other BB, it is tough to equate this independent report with Canadian reserve reporting (AEN will have to do this by March 31st. Last year AEN reported 2P reserves at Causeway of 12.3 mmstb (from East Causeway drilling) People are confusing the P50 reserves of this RPF report with P2 reserves defined under National Instrument 150 (Canadian standards) P50 assumes a 50% probability of the stated reserves being there, whereas P2 reserves are definded as having btw a 40% and 80% probablity of the stated reserves being there. Therefore the number to equate will lie btw the p50 and p10 of the RPF report!! Also they are using a low recoverable factor (28%)50% recovery for Jurassic fields in the N. Sea under water injection is the norm. We also do not know the parameters that where used, so in many ways we are whistling the dark! The analysts are just taking the numbers and doing their re-jigs on the numbers. We have already taken the 50% hit in the SP. so it is old news! My point is are they comparing Apples with Apples? On approval of the ,alot of those P2 reserves will go to P1 (Proven), which by definition have a 90% probabiliy of being there. Production is what counts and will mitigate an upgrading of reserves. Still will be getting 15000-20000 BOPD. Every new well drilled will change the reserves too. Most oilfields are upgraded over their history. The RPF report does not include Kerloch, Fyne and Dandy or Argentina. Bigbadun'
Bullboard Posts