Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Active Control Technology Inc ATIVF



GREY:ATIVF - Post by User

Comment by sebastian2on Sep 02, 2007 1:41am
385 Views
Post# 13333044

RE: State Rejects Mine Proposals - August 31

RE: State Rejects Mine Proposals - August 31"West Virginia's 254 underground coal mines were rejected Friday as state regulators said the proposals lacked detailed descriptions on how the systems would be developed and used." This tells me that the regulators are looking for detailed protocols that will need to be tied into any emergency/rescue plans in place. I bet coal companies tried to be vague because this poses a certain liability risk. If they publish plans and don't apply them in an event of an accident the state regulators could go after them for failing to execute the plan as states and approved by the regulators. This sounds like a legal delay at the most.
Bullboard Posts