OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
justlikethaton Feb 12, 2013 11:06am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0341-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
133 Views
Post# 20974496
RE: RE: RE: Capping High Assays
RE: RE: RE: Capping High Assays That's not even logical. BGW has been involved with the consultants from day one. The conflict you outline would have been reported long ago and an alternative pursued. Throughout the process, BGM has provided updates that includes both Geoex and Snowden working collaboratively. If one was grossly in error, it would have been outed by now.
" The Company has been recently advised by each of Snowden and Geoex that they reasonably expect that a complete draft of their updated NI 43-101 Report should be available for review by the Company in the first week of February, such that the Company reasonably expects that it might be in a position to fully respond to the BCSC's technical disclosure comments and file a final and acceptable NI 43-101 Report on SEDAR by the final week of February."