OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
DDocon Mar 18, 2013 1:38am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0341-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
276 Views
Post# 21143892
RE: Partial Revocation Order on BGM Stock
RE: Partial Revocation Order on BGM Stock "The Executive Director is satisfied that this order is not prejudicial to the public interest."
If Mr Cameron's trading is not prejudicial to the public interest, then why is mine?
The Executive Director just let a single trader off of a big hook. Are we living in pre-Magna Carta times? Or maybe once elected you can do whatever you freaking like. Equal under the law my assets.
If Mr Cameron is in fact a higher caste than I, then I sincerely apologize.