RE:RE:I sure like this JonBoomskid wrote: Stockhouse's Jon Brown articles are no longer appearing on this forum. I don't know whether that's permanent or not, but given the precarious position that Bioasis is in, Stockhouse may not consider it a viable place to be posting their in-house promotional and reporting articles. Jon Brown's articles are still being posted on other Stockhouse Bullboards.
It seems that some folks think that Jon Brown was posting on only this forum and that he was getting all those 5 to 10 thumbs on this forum. I would say that he's not getting very many thumbs given that his posts are widely visible across Stockhouse.
Still, it's very upsetting to me that Jon Brown gets more thunmbs than I do.
Also, Stockhouse has reverted to an old forum header for this forum, a header that displays the old "biOasis" name instead of "Bioasis." Was Bioasis paying for the previous promotional header and are they no longer paying Stockhouse for it?
My guess is that Rathjen no longer cares how Bioasis is presented and promoted. I suspect that, well, you know what I'm expecting next from Rathjen.
jd
How about a Reverse Takeover (RTO)? Also called Reverse IPO!!
Our shares will be replaced with the shares of the new company proportionately. And there may be a tax incentive for the new public company with Bioasis's balance sheet having ~$43Mil deficit.
JMO
G1945V