Barker Minerals Ltd BKMNF

RE: Does BML Share 2 Ore Bodies with CRN''''s QR ?

[goldmember2]

C'mon Jack...this is a stretch even for you! Honestly, what are you trying to suggest with that cryptic map? Firstly, the map seems to be touting possible potential for Pt-Pd-Ni in that area. Last time I checked, QR was a gold deposit, and only a marginal "orebody" at that (i.e. low grade, low tonnage) - no offense to the CRN investors. Secondly, as NewKid has alluded to, a magnetic high does not even constitute a prospect let alone an orebody. In fact, the vast majority of mag highs result from underlying magnetic rocks (e.g. mafic rocks) and have nothing to do with mineralization. Most of the results on that map are from placer samples, i.e. river sediments/gravels, that could have come from almost anywhere. Oh yes, there is one 35 ppb Pt sample in drillcore reported. Heck, my stool probably has 35 ppb Pt in it (and I don't mean the one I am sitting on). Surely if this is a core asset of Barker's they would have done some work on the property recently and therefore have a more up-to-date map than Sept. 2001 (as is the date on that map authored by A. Doyle) ?? Or are you just conducting ad hoc promotion on their behalf without them knowing, doing them a "favour", if you will? Barker would probably see it differently. gm2