Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barker Minerals Ltd BKMNF

As in our news release dated March 5th 2019 Barker Minerals Ltd. President CEO Louis Doyle states that: Barker is extremely pleased to be working in collaboration with such a fine group of worldly professionals scientists and institutions to further the understanding of the surface and basement mantle rocks of this highly mineralized and underexplored district. These groundbreaking scientific studies together with Barkers exploration efforts are forging a new modern understanding of the geology which significantly increases the probability of diamonds being discovered with an Archean age of the mantle material on surface being identified on the Tasse project area it further enhances the possible economic importance of this area by orders of magnitude.


GREY:BKMNF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by goldmember2on Nov 09, 2007 4:24pm
194 Views
Post# 13786049

RE: Why did Crosslake Overstake Kangaroo?

RE: Why did Crosslake Overstake Kangaroo?Again, you are spectacularly wrong...Firstly, Sullivan had wide ranges in thicknesses, from <1 metre to >50 metres think. Secondly, Kangaroo is NOT even a Sullivan-type target, so why even bring up Sullivan; it is a porphyry-related Cu-Au target (these are MUCH larger than massive sulphide targets, but lower grade) - you would be better to compare to QR or Mt. Polley deposits. Thirdly, as I pointed out earlier, Cross Lake had their claims BEFORE Barker's, so the whole discussion is MOOT (some of the claims even pre-date Cross Lake and were staked by Imperial Metals I believe). Check your facts because you are not helping yourself! gm2
Bullboard Posts