GREY:BKMNF - Post by User
Comment by
goldmember2on Nov 09, 2007 4:24pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
194 Views
Post# 13786049
RE: Why did Crosslake Overstake Kangaroo?
RE: Why did Crosslake Overstake Kangaroo?Again, you are spectacularly wrong...Firstly, Sullivan had wide ranges in thicknesses, from <1 metre to >50 metres think. Secondly, Kangaroo is NOT even a Sullivan-type target, so why even bring up Sullivan; it is a porphyry-related Cu-Au target (these are MUCH larger than massive sulphide targets, but lower grade) - you would be better to compare to QR or Mt. Polley deposits. Thirdly, as I pointed out earlier, Cross Lake had their claims BEFORE Barker's, so the whole discussion is MOOT (some of the claims even pre-date Cross Lake and were staked by Imperial Metals I believe).
Check your facts because you are not helping yourself!
gm2