Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Generative AI Solutions Corp C.AICO

Alternate Symbol(s):  AICOF

Generative AI Solutions Corp. is a Canada-based artificial intelligence (AI) company. The Company is focused on developing transformative AI-powered tools for businesses and consumers across multiple industries. The Company is engaged in developing AI-based solutions that have applicability and can be integrated into diverse workflows. In addition to its custom AI solutions, it also offers a... see more

CSE:AICO - Post Discussion

Generative AI Solutions Corp > Payout ratios: should be 77.50.% Poda & 22.50 % Ryan....
View:
Post by deepoil0808 on May 14, 2022 3:14pm

Payout ratios: should be 77.50.% Poda & 22.50 % Ryan....

MO has agreed to pay $ 100.5 million USD to get IP, patents and license.   This works out to about $ 130 million.

With 130 million shares in circulation, those that can logically be converted, it means they paid $ 1 per share.

Ryan has determined the $ 1 per share which MO is paying is to be divided as follows:

(a) 45 cents to Ryan and partner
(b) 55 cents to Poda

They say that they have an evaluation report and I personally contest those calculations for the following reasons.

The royalty agreement which Ryan and partner have with Poda is that they get 4.5% of gross sales, note that the word is gross sales, not net sales.

In the tobacco world where you are dealing with addicts, the gross and net profit margins are lucrative.

A tobacco company can generate 20% to 25% as the bottom line on net profit.

So lets do an example so that everyone can follow:


                              Poda gross sales:                                    $ 10,000,000

                              Net profit before royalty (20%)                       2,000,000

                              Payment of royalty (4.5% of sales)                   450,000  (4.5% * $ 10 million sales)

                              Net profit to Poda                                           1,550,000


Ryan and Poda are selling their rights to future sales and are receiving present value of these future sales which MO has calculated to be $ 100.5 million USD today or, $ 130 million Canadian.

So to know what each party is entitle to, we have to know what each party is giving up per year.

In the case above, where we have $ 2 million in profits

-  Ryan and partners are giving up  $ 450,000 in royalty per year

-  Poda is giving up net profits after payment of royalty of $ 1,550,000


Therefore the compensation payment of $ 130,000,000 by MO should be dividend as follows:

           (a)  To Ryan and partner:        $ 29,250,000                   ($450,000/2,000,000 * $ 130,000,000)
      
           (b)   To Poda:                            100,750,000                   ($1,550,000/2,000,000 * $ 130,000,000)


The payout ratio therefore has to be as follows, 

          (1)    To Ryan                                  22.50%                      ($29,500,000 given up / 130,000,000 payment)

          (2)    To Poda                                  77.50%                       ($100,750,000 given up / 130,000,000 payment)


UNJUST ENRICHMENT by Ryan and his partner

          Per calculation above Ryan and partner are entitled to $ 29,250,000 payment out of $ 130,000,000
          
          Instead there is unjust enrichment of $ 29,250,000 as they are collecting double to what they are entiled

          They are entitled to $ 29,250,000 but are collecting $ 58,500,000 ($45,000,000 USD * 1.30)


UNJUST IMPOVERISHMENT TO PODA

          Per calculation above PODA is entitled to $ 100,750,000 payment out of $ 130,000,000
          
          Instead there is unjust impoverishment of $ 29,250,000 as they are collecting less than what they is entiled

          They are entitled to $100,750,000 but are collecting $ 71,500,000 ($55,000,000 USD * 1.30)


IN ADDITION PODA PATENT ASSIGNMENT AT $ 146,000

          In a video on youtube Ryan stated that PODA developped the intellectual property meaning the patent

          Ryan and partner took the patent for $ 146,000 and, it was sold with others for $ 45,000,000 USD

          It is a related party transaction and there is a clear violation of fundamental rights to Poda.

          Poda is entitled to a large chunk of the $ 45 million USD proceeds.


There is enough cause and merit for a legal team to do its work and to confirm whether or not Poda has suffered an injustice.

My personal opinion
Comment by podatlis1 on May 14, 2022 5:22pm
RYAN IS FLIPPING US THE BIRD...
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities