RE:Patent Information
Jumpth3shark, I have to wonder why you have come out of the woodwork all of a sudden on this company. It's most interesting to me that you claim to have been promoting this at .28 yet you've never posted on this board prior to this week and now you are here any trying to pump the stock with information that is "not yet announced but available by researching on the net". If information is in a company produced video then it is in fact "announced" even if no agreement is in place and anything else is speculation and potentially leaks of insider information so not worth anything.
I am quite concerned with your motives here as you are leaving out critical information in your posts with this post being just one example. Your patent argument above holds no bearing as you left out a critical detail. Every one of these patents listed above is a
patent application with not one being an approved US patent. Search the database and prove me wrong as I have looked. If you try and search the application numbers on the US patent site as none of these are available to the public so they are still in the private only view which means they are not yet approved and are still subject to challenge etc.
This list is also readily available in the amalgation agreement between the companies here:
https://www.otciq.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=108595
And in that document it is clear that these are simply applications with no approval yet with most of them having been filed in 2013 based on the application numbers that start with 13.
A lot of people on this board have lost significant dollars on this stock and all I would ask is that anyone posting needs to post fact and not fiction so people can make informed decisions and not get suckered into the story again....as that is all it is...a story....
AC