Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Eco Oro Minerals Corp C.EOM

Alternate Symbol(s):  GYSLF

Eco Oro Minerals Corp. is a Canada-based precious metals exploration and mining development company. The Company was focused on advancing its principal asset, the Angostura Underground project. Its Angostura project is located in northeastern Colombia. The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Arbitration Claim has now become the core focus of the Company.

CSE:EOM - Post Discussion

Eco Oro Minerals Corp > Read Eagle article. Bad news...
View:
Post by sailor8 on Mar 04, 2024 9:09pm

Read Eagle article. Bad news...

JUDICIAL
Legal triumph of Colombia to the mining company Red Eagle by paramo from Santurbn
 
El pramo de Santurbn
Colprensa
 
LA REPBLICA MS
Add to your topics of interest
 
arbitration awards
Mining
Santurbn
Manage your topics
Carlos Jaramillo Palacio
Monday, March 4, 2024
 
An arbitral tribunal issued an award dismissing the claims for expropriation and violation of the Minimum Treatment Standard
 
“This is a great national triumph. We stopped the loss of territory defending our Caribbean Sea and now we managed to defend our wasteland from greed. The Nation and Life have triumphed ”, with these words in X, President Gustavo Petro celebrated that Colombia won the demand for the mining ban in the Santurbn wasteland.
 
This whole statement is because in the last hours, An Arbitral Tribunal confirmed that the country did not breach the Canada-Colombia FTA and endorsed the measures adopted to protect paramo ecosystems, particularly Santurbn, after a lawsuit against the State filed by a mining firm.
 
The Arbitration Court concluded the arbitration process initiated by Red Eagle Exploration Limited (Red Eagle) against Colombia. The process originated as a result of the prohibition of mining activity in the paramo ecosystems, specifically in the Santurbn moor In its ruling, the Court issued an award dismissing the claims for expropriation and violation of the Minimum Treatment Standard presented by Red Eagle, a mining company based in Colombia.
 
The decision acknowledges that the prohibition of carrying out mining activities in paramo ecosystems constitutes a legitimate exercise of Colombian law to exercise regulatory powers for the general interest, especially in matters related to the protection of the environment.
 
Red Eagle's lawsuit sought compensation of close to $ 130 million. They argued that the legislative, administrative, and judicial measures adopted by the Colombian authorities to prohibit mining in paramo ecosystems had impeded the development of their mining project in the area of Santurbn, constituyendo as una expropiacin indirecta de su inversin.
 
However, the Arbitral Tribunal accepted the defense arguments presented by the Colombian State. The decision was celebrated by the National Agency for Legal Defense of the State (Andje).

-------------------

I do not know if and if yes, how much money Red Eagle invested into Exploration works trusting on an issued licence.
Comment by TiredofWating on Mar 05, 2024 11:05am
Yikes...   Not good.
Comment by MacBook on Mar 05, 2024 1:21pm
Thanks for posting Sailor. It would be interesting to see the text of the ruling. RedEagle delisted some time ago. The quality of the accounting and title records could have impacted the court
Comment by sailor8 on Mar 05, 2024 8:03pm
Agree: In our case there was already a decision in Sept. 2021 which said: By a majority, the Tribunal decides that Colombia is not in breach of Article 811 of the FTA. (3) By a majority, the Tribunal decides that Colombia is in breach of Article 805 of the FTA. Which means in my legal layman`s words: Colombia had the right to stop mining within the (still not officially fixed) Paramo boarders ...more