RE:Quarterly FS & insufficient RP disclosure"Consultant" payments with $0.05 options lol. Don't say I didn't warn you. Every quarter expect a new surprise.
BarstoolSage wrote: I think there is insufficient discloure here. In the related party note other names are named, but not the individual names of directors being compensated by immediately vesting options .
I can see using these kinds of things are smart as long as there is value for service, and I can see certain supplier relationships need not be disclosed when issuing such options but individual directors who are paid in options and who have subscriptions for debentures where interest is paid on immediateky vested interest shares to me is fair information for shareholders of a publicly traded company
Now this is a Notice to Reader, so not audited.
I expect this is a legitimate enquiry of the company.
Don't think it a cause for alarm or reason to reassess risk here. I'm simply asking for the sake of fair and full disclosure of related party transactions