Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

MountainWest Resources Inc. C.MWR



CSE:MWR - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Gomazzzon Sep 01, 2015 4:15pm
74 Views
Post# 24069584

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Chilean Courts

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Chilean CourtsIn an effort to keep the record straight I would refer to the Press Release of December 22, 2014 by the lawyer representing Jorge Lopehandia where it answers the questions regarding the concessions. No doubt the confusion has many baffled but please point to all references so that we can all make an informed decision.


MOUNTAINSTAR GOLD INC.
Suite 1500, PO Box 10127
701 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC V7Y 1C6
(MSX-CSE)
NEWS RELEASE
LEGAL REPORT FROM JORGE LOPEHANDIA’S CHILEAN ATTORNEY
December 22, 2014
Mountainstar Gold is pleased to present an update from Jorge Lopehandia’s Chilean lawyer.
Please note that Spanish/English does not always translate perfectly.
Together with my greetings I am coming to authorize you to translate into legal English the present
document, authorizing as well its publication by any means you deem convenient, what includes
the following tenor:
Before the 2nd Civil Court of Vallenar in files over extinct prescription in mining matters, Rol C-
719-2011, named Lopehandia Cortes with Minera Nevada SpA, it was presented, without any legal
fundamentals an incidence of us abandoning the proceedings and thanks to a iron clad legal defense
effected by the writer, as lawyer, the Tribunal rejected it with express and exemplary condemnation
in costs-
Said costs pertain to process costs of the Trial and personal expenses effected exclusively by Jorge
Rodrigo Lopehandia Cortes.
We are waiting for the illustrious Court of Appeals of Copiapo will confirm such resolution in
accordance to law, what is subject to no legal recourse against it, decision which will be issued no
further than the end of January 2015.
2. An Iron tight defense was made at the recourse of casacion we presented, before the
Excelentisima Corte Suprema de Chile, whereas we seek as first objective to extinguish the mining
properties named ¨Amarillos 1 al 3000¨ and to declare null the 10,000 pesos contract over the 1996
concessions, property of Mr. Jorge Rodrigo Lopehandia Cortes.
Unda´s position: Mr. Hector Mardoqueo Unda Llanos by means of his lawyer Mr. Francisco Rene
Valle Pensa in the files Role C-1912-2001 of the 14th Civil Court of Santiago, expressly indicated
that he never acted as agent, representative or mandated by Minera Nevada S.A. when he filed his
concessions that originated the exploitation concessions ¨Tesoros One 1 to 30¨ through to ¨Tesoros
Twelve 1 to 5¨.
Later before the 2nd Civil Court of Vallenar, by a Notarized Sworn Affidavit, admits that all his
acts related to his intervention at Project Pascua Lama Chile, was due to a contractual link that he
had with Minera Nevada SpA, what is a contradiction, a mockery to the Superior Justice Tribunals.
2 positions Nieto:
Initially it was indicated that the concessions Tesoros One 1 to 30 to Tesoros Twelve 1 to 5, were
located over and above the areas of the mining concessions named Amarillos Sur 1996, the area
of greatest geological interest of the Pascua Lama Project, only to fall in contradiction later.
The year 2010 without any legal rights, the decision from the Excelentsima Supreme Court of
Chile, was reopened with false testimony, that they do not know Hector Mardoqueo Unda Llanos.
They confessed to not have mining titles in case Role C-719-2011 from the Second Civil Court of
Vallenar, nor constitutive mining property judgment to their name, no certificate of domain, not
even a contract or legal mandate from Hector Unda Llanos.
The areas covered by Mr. Lopehandia´s mining concessions are the ones of greatest geological
importance to the Project, so much so, that such is recognized expressly by Minera Nevada Spa at
files of C-1912-2001, before the 14th Civil Court in Santiago.
The only litigant before Minera Nevada Spa and BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION with legal
rights over the areas of Mina Pascua Chile, is Jorge Rodrigo Lopehandia Cortes at this date
December 18th, 2014, Villar no longer enjoys rights, less OJANCO GROUP or Cristobal
Lopehandia Cortes.
Barrick enjoys only salts and nitrates concessions 1978-2014 from LAC MINERALS not legally
covering Gold production at areas called AMARILLOS 1 to 3000 at PASCUA LAMA
PROTOCOL
The TESOROS concessions continue to be in the legal name of JORGE RODRIGO
LOPEHANDIA CORTES at the margin of the titles.
The titles of AMRILLOS SUR 3400 hectares and MARILLOS NORTE 5200 hectares continue in
the legal hands of Jorge Rodrigo Lopehandia without marginal annotations from third parties at
titles.
Authorized to
Bullboard Posts