Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nutritional High International Inc. Ordinary Shares C.NHL


Primary Symbol: SPLID

High Fusion Inc is engaged in the manufacturing, processing, and distribution of infused edible products. The company's operating and geographical segments include Palo Verde; Pasa Verde; Oregon; Colorado; Nevada and Washington. It generates maximum revenue from the Palo Verde segment.


OTCPK:SPLID - Post by User

Comment by Waltzeron Mar 14, 2019 4:42pm
78 Views
Post# 29487847

RE:Nutritional High Base

RE:Nutritional High Base
1mattman wrote: Nutritional High has a sound base.  They own property, they have revenue from leases of property and equipment.  They have partnerships with solid companies and have purchased key companies that flow with their objectives.  

Quarterly financials will be out in two weeks.  If you don't like the results, it'll be your choice to stay or leave.  I believe it'll surprise many in being much higher than last quarter but even a 20% rise in revenue would show growth.  

Nutritional High is valued correctly or even below fair market value and I cannot say that about too many other MJ Stocks.  Wait until November when they enter Canada!


This is not true. I believe in one of their MD&A's they stopped recording rental revenues (property and equipment) because of some issues in Colorado and they wrote off whatever loans they gave to that co-packing company. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>