RE:RE:RE:RE:Something to think aboutQuirkle - you just made my point with how this company communicates to it's shareholders.
It sure sounds like Greg has a plan & a good one too. Then why can't he do an email to shareholders?
He's still not saying the NDA's name. He's still saing NDA & not the name of the NDA.. So he's not giving out info before its made public. He's not breaking any SEC rules.
Why can't Greg just say, the company plans to do this with the R/O $ money?
R/O money will pay for mostly material and chemicals to run, and people to run the material on first and second shift. Then sustained operation and cashflow begins. This will prove out the system 100%.to the investment broker to give RGX a loan for the Module #2. Then this also unveils the NDA’s. The company has a financing plan in place with an investment broker once the plant is cash flowing , and that is the path to the NASDAQ.
IMO, this above statement that Greg COULD have sent to shareholders does not break any SEC rules. Nothing was done yet. So it does not have to be public in a PR yet.
It is just what RGX plans to do and is just keeping the shareholders informed like a good company should do.