Comment by
Cottrader on Jul 08, 2020 8:14am
not sure how either of them got fda approval; https://www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/fda-alerts-health-care-providers-about-false-positives-for-one-of-bds-covid-19-tests-2020-07-07
Comment by
gonnasee on Jul 08, 2020 9:31am
The Americans want the testing to remain inhouse. They wont spend money outside of the country. Can anyone explain why Sona testing results at 96% only had 30 samples. (way too small). Something not right.
Comment by
bluebeard123 on Jul 08, 2020 9:35am
You can calculate sample size that gives enough statistical confidence in the results. It's all math.
Comment by
NashDaSlash on Jul 08, 2020 9:39am
You don't know what you are talking about. Validation studies are set up by MRIGlobal, and SONA is continuing to bloster to their clinical data with in-field testing. Nothing sinister here.
Comment by
NashDaSlash on Jul 08, 2020 9:49am
Other companies used 1000s, why don't you list some links to these 3rd party validations using 1000s of samples?
Comment by
bluebeard123 on Jul 08, 2020 9:50am
I know it sounds like a small sample size but minimum sample size to get a certain statistically confidence can be calculated. It's no different from polling.