Sona Nanotech Inc C.SONA

Nasdaq

[Awsm11]

lets not forget about getting on Nasdaq as well.  

the timing would be perfect if the fda approved, they started rolling out tests, and got listed on the nasdaq all in the next month or so.

Would be perfect timing, happy labor day to us....

US will still be shut down and looking for tests like crazy.  Especially after Trump Jr or even worse Barron Trump gets sick....  

testing all around..

[Moemoney42]

Many times when a stock lists on the Nasdaq (especially with a previous gap not filled) the shorters will attack it relentlessly... be aware that a Nasdaq listing isn't a slam dunk price rise..! Also remember there are many other tests available with higher than 99.5% accuracy with results in less than 3 hrs... so I'm sure Jr. and Barron would be only using the finest of tests if any.

[whatdoiknow123]

I would be interested to hear of any Antigen or PCR test that can confirm active infection that is 99.5% accurate (not a term usually used in testing where sensitivity and selectivity are quoted) and the results available in less than 3 hours AND that are inexpensive, don´t require access to machines that will limit the number of tests that can be performed and readily available. Please let

[whatdoiknow123]

What´s wrong Moemoney, after assuring us about the existence of these superior tests that are so good and quick that Sona will find it difficult to compete you can´t tell us what tests you are talking about. STILL WAITING.

[Moemoney42]

Just back from an excellent golf round... now you might be waiting for a long time because I'm not here to do you're DD for you.. get to work now.. by the way keep pumping.. she's losing air..! LOL..!

[CalChemp77]

Really? That is your response? You make a claim and then when someone calls you out you prefer to reply with "do you own DD" instead of presenting the second and most important half of your argument / position? You're a waste of time my friend.

[burnout29]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[whatdoiknow123]

If you state that these tests exist then you have already done the DD and it would merely be a question of giving the names of the tests to back up your claims. Normally when one make categorical claims on a bulletin board one is raedy with the relevant information to back up those claims. The reason you do not do so is because no such tests exist and are merely a figment of your imagination. You

[whatdoiknow123]

Moemoney, I don´t expect you to do my DD for me, in fact if you believe many of the claims that you have made, I would certainly prefer you NOT do do my DD. The point isthat you claim  there are many tests out there that are more accurate, almost as quick and easily used ( presumably at a reasonable price) that render Sona´s test inferior. In order to ascertain this you must

[buy2009]

Please cite the antigen test that is 99.5%+ accurate   

[Moemoney42]

Never said it was an "antigen" test...its like you pumpers just can't read or like to read bogus stuff into a post... which is it..? What happens if the field test proves the 96% number to be elusive.. which it will most likely be as field testing is far more prone to error than a controlled lab test.. so where are these millions of tests going to be performed... hint.. not in a lab.

[burnout29]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[datawork]

Burnout, I disagree... There is obviously much more going on behind the scenes than can be made publicly available at this time. Sona has a proven trck record to this point. As I've said before, you just don't apply for a Nasdaq listing for the hell of it. Much less publicly announce it unless you have valid reason for doing so.  When the nws is released, I think most of us will