Another red flag for investors is when anyone questions the completely false claims repeated by the pumpers of a stock (like Warren Buffet investing or the CEO, Anoosh, having a 400$ mil exit) or attempts to discuss the fundamentals of the company (no IP moat, comparable products already on market, lack of money and technical skills, unclear revenue paths and profit estimates etc), the pumpers last resort is to try and shut down the conversation with personal attacks, claims of shorts, bashers and trolls, and other conspiracies theories.
Example here: https://twitter.com/wildcat2013/status/1787487984515690750
while the user has no proof oyo and I are the same
person and from reading oyos posts it seems like he: sticks to discussing company fundamentals, has a strong understanding of the tech, the limitations of it and the fair value of the company.
Comparably the other person who is complaining about trolls and bashers has a very long history of making completely fabricated information up and calling for share prices that not only never, ever materialize but were completely unrealistic from an economic perspective.
So who is the real scammer, the person talking about facts or the person holding cheap shares making up false claims to drive the price up?