sneakysneaky wrote: I am like Nipsey Hussle on repeat, in the "blink" of an eye, you will do a 180, 2.
That wordplay is over your head. You are like a fool who believes everything on the interweb.
Do you think I wasn't born before 1999? Obviously, you can't do simple DD. smh. Ya you should syh cause you are a liar or a prune for Jeff.
Richard mentioned the upgrades currently taking place at the long beach facility will allow for multiple lines to run simultaneously. Did you even read the Q3 corporate presentation? Read the latest financials, under "potentially unlock" it states "to run concurrently as possible" which is wording for maybe or maybe not. I don't have to read the Q3 presentation cause it is going to change again. DID you read it cause I don't see Becketts for sale in Ontario anymore.
"Weekly client bookings since mid-June 2021 onward; further growth expected from increased daily use and enabling multiple lines to run simultaneously." "as possible" see above you plunk. Since mid-June, so where is the revenue? I thought you said Rick stated they have run hundreds of thousands and had repeat runs and at your .55c a mini bottle it was going to create vast amounts of money.
The 1% tax means on a going-forward basis Tinley's products and their co-packers can be produced cheaper than competitors in Cali. It means higher margins. It means chosing Long Beach to build a facility instead of Modesto Cali or another county was the smart decision. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing.
The tax break also means when interstate cannabis happens Tinley will be shipping to legal states cannabis beverages cheaper than competitors. There is no if, it will happen, it's simply a matter of when, none of you reefer madness trolls scare me in the slightest, a bunch of keyboard warriors who look down at the ground when a real one looks you dead in the eyes in real life, pfffft. Let me know how that shipping to legal states is working and when it's going to be working in your wet dreams. Dorothy wished she was in Kansas and one day she will be, it's only a matter of when.
0 debt, yes, and currently operating in a federally illegal market with no access to safe banking, that's an accomplishment that cannot be said for a handful of cannabis companies, not to mention publicly traded ones. Broke is a temporary situation, poor is a state of mind, Tinley's had inbound institutional interest before Safe Banking was weeks/months away from passing, it won't disappear now, hence the reason the peanut gallery is sooooOO loud.
What does this one mean dippy, "We are working to provide clear direction, and fresh focus on assets, systems, and resources." Go ahead and tell us your vast knowledgable interpretation, exhalted one?
I can't tell you which mainstream beverage brands, MSO's, or Canadian LP's are interested in co-packing with Tinley, I wouldn't have any sources if I sold them out to goofy's such as yourself, I can only make "assumptions" like TLRY who tried to trademark one of Tinley's cannabis beverages in Canada.
Do you think Richard is going to allow the entire company to be sold for 18c when his average cost is 33c? HAHAHA! Richard has no say on if somebody wants to try and take over this company at .13c or .15c No one has enough shares to stop a hostile takeover now. So as that little boy in your Moms kitchen you need to rethink that.
It's easier said than done buying a publicly-traded company operating in multiple states and countries with thousands of retail shareholders. Beckett's is in more mainstream retailers in multiple states and countries than the majority of peers who only operate in mom & pops cannabis dispensaries in one state, such as Levia who was purchased for 60M with much less potential than Tinley's.
55c per unit to 1.20 is on the Q3 corporate presentation as a specific co-packing fee, you dummy. You suck. Now this is just hillllarious, you think I suck, well buddy you better clean your underwear before they stick to you, you young preme. You talk like it's your first time, too funny. Go ahead ya wiener explain where all the money you were expecting is? BHWAAAA, Look out for the short bus cause you missed it again.
Pedronocents wrote: Hey Snakey, whats with you. Are you really just like that Blink 182 song- What's my age again? It's probably from before you were born so ask your Moms about it. Let's see what is wrong with your assumptions. quote=sneakysneaky]
15 net buyers over the previous month, and only 6 net sellers with Anon selling 15x all net sellers combined except for TD!! Don't mistaken Tinley's share price with the company's performance operationally. | House Positions for C:TNY from 20211025 to 20211125 |
| 22 Fidelity | 2,179,500 | 317,960 | 0.146 | 100,376 | 16,562 | 0.165 | 2,079,124 | -301,398 |
| 2 RBC | 1,971,694 | 285,955 | 0.145 | 718,485 | 101,485 | 0.141 | 1,253,209 | -184,470 |
| 79 CIBC | 1,220,580 | 163,990 | 0.134 | 695,831 | 103,225 | 0.148 | 524,749 | -60,765 |
| 89 Raymond James | 518,175 | 75,282 | 0.145 | 81,154 | 11,484 | 0.142 | 437,021 | -63,798 |
| 80 National Bank | 531,441 | 79,438 | 0.149 | 122,171 | 17,811 | 0.146 | 409,270 | -61,627 |
| 9 BMO Nesbitt | 551,240 | 79,654 | 0.144 | 183,621 | 26,162 | 0.142 | 367,619 | -53,492 |
| 85 Scotia | 983,217 | 140,322 | 0.143 | 657,920 | 95,815 | 0.146 | 325,297 | -44,507 |
| 88 Credential | 404,010 | 54,786 | 0.136 | 79,475 | 12,103 | 0.152 | 324,535 | -42,683 |
| 124 Questrade | 301,135 | 41,530 | 0.138 | 27,600 | 4,262 | 0.154 | 273,535 | -37,268 |
| 13 Instinet | 113,000 | 15,114 | 0.134 | 46,500 | 7,106 | 0.153 | 66,500 | -8,008 |
| 28 BBS | 20,000 | 2,350 | 0.118 | 0 | | 20,000 | -2,350 |
| 59 PI | 16,400 | 2,706 | 0.165 | 0 | | 16,400 | -2,706 |
| 19 Desjardins | 13,800 | 1,912 | 0.139 | 8,000 | 1,240 | 0.155 | 5,800 | -672 |
| 14 ITG | 11,799 | 1,680 | 0.142 | 10,762 | 1,598 | 0.148 | 1,037 | -82 |
| 18 Echelon | 3,882,576 | 388,257 | 0.10 | 3,882,576 | 388,257 | 0.10 | 0 | 0 |
| 68 Leede | 0 | | 3,800 | 532 | 0.14 | -3,800 | 532 |
| 70 Manulife | 5,000 | 750 | 0.15 | 11,115 | 1,667 | 0.15 | -6,115 | 917 |
| 36 Latimer | 9,289 | 1,389 | 0.15 | 27,005 | 4,005 | 0.148 | -17,716 | 2,616 |
| 33 Canaccord | 114,000 | 15,492 | 0.136 | 308,000 | 46,930 | 0.152 | -194,000 | 31,438 |
| 7 TD Sec | 2,295,100 | 321,240 | 0.14 | 2,927,097 | 412,720 | 0.141 | -631,997 | 91,480 |
| 1 Anonymous | 1,707,373 | 238,473 | 0.14 | 6,957,841 | 975,334 | 0.14 | -5,250,468 | 736,861 |
| TOTAL | 16,849,329 | 2,228,280 | 0.132 | 16,849,329 | 2,228,298 | 0.132 | 0 | 18 |
For every net seller there are more than 2x the amount of net buyers, meaning, more investors/traders see the risk to reward favoring the buy side at these manipulated depressed prices. Tinley's signed 10+ co-packing clients in less than 1 year and is nearing the completion of expanding all beverage production capacity allowing numerous lines to operate simultaneously with the addition of new formats.
Big deal they signed 10, how many are they currently producing for? Please show the press release which states they will be operating numerous lines simultaneously?
1% tax break not available to competitors in California operating outside Long Beach.
So what a 1% tax rate means, nothing from nothing leaves/means nothing.
0 debt. and almost 0 money in the coffers.
Fixed cost business with high margins & another 30+ co-packers in NDA discussions, some in final stages with MSO's and mainstream beverage brands.
Go ahead tell us its 30+ and I have a 12 inch pianist at home. MSO's and mainstream beverage brands, which ones? Cause if just 1 really wanted this company they could probably offer .18 and take this whole company over with that.
Tinley only needs 3-4 successful co-packing clients to generate enough earnings to profitability, not including Beckett's, and Tinley's cannabis branded products in two countries.
And that my friend is the tricky part, when will they be producing for 3 - 4 "successful" co-packers? Please restate the truth, Tinley's is not in "two countries", just like my pianist, and Becketts is only available in Alberta not Ontario (in Canada) as the updated Tinleys site states.
55c per unit x2M units x4 co-packers = 4.4M, Tinley's cash burn went down on previous financials from roughly 2.3M to 1.8M per Q, once the expansion is finished COGS should continue decreasing and cash-flow positive or profitability will happen sooner rather than later. IMO.
Another theory!!! .55c per unit, who says they are getting that, it's been bandied about between .50 and 1.something erother. But let's say they offer a company a deal like we will produce the first batch at .20 per and if they run so much the cost declines so that it gets to .10 per. Now how many deals do you think might have been made like that? Who would you say is doing the distro for those said products that you believe are being produced by Tinley's/Lakewood by the hundreds of thousands?
That's a bare minimum bearish example per quarter with 4 co-packers only using the mini-line & Canning line.
Unfortunately stock prices are a good indication of how things are going? For ever Tesla or Monster there are hundreds of stock failures the other way, so don't try and pull that 1 rabbit out of the hat, Bullwinkle. Oh sorry another one before your time.
Revenues have increased YoY by 1000% & QoQ by 100%. Eventually hat sales had to go up.
Upcoming earnings will be between 700k-1M, that's my estimate. Great the internet psychic, Dear Abbie can you tell me am I going to come into some taco's? Sorry, another one from before your conception.
Tinley's currently trading below asset value and nearing the bottom of a descending broadening wedge on a macro chart, I expect to see a bullish reversal around 9c-8c CAD when the price approaches the baseline of support on the pattern coinciding with earnings. If the price declines below the downward sloping support and it turns into resistance upon back-testing, 6.5c is the next price target, all the way down to 3.5c.