RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:ceo.ca signs you are being acquired...interesting readRedwine----Thanks for the question to me. I have a hundred questions I would love to have answered, but my questions will never be answered because if we could see how much $hit is in this sewer of stock market manipulations, there would be zero people (with a few exceptions) e s stupid enough to put one dime in these scams.
I have zero answers, only theories based on projections, based on feelings, and based on zero evidence.
Sorry!
Redwine12345 wrote: Hi Charlie, thanks for the post. Have question for you.
You are saying :
Forget about tallying up the number of brokerages that are net seller’s vs the number of brokerages that are net buyers. They are all one and the same using a different name to transfer shares and keep their positions the same, all the while manipulating the market to fit their agenda. In Tinley's case, it is obvious that their agenda is to short TNY into bankruptcy and they have done one hell of a good job so far.
In another paragraph, you recognize the fact that they own substantial amount of shares.
In order for them to be profitable, the amount of shares shorted should be larger than amount of shares the have. But this is not the case. There is hardly any shares shorted compared to the outstanding shares.
Trading for the sake of pushing company into bancruptcy doesn't make sense, unless they are going to be paid by someone who wants to see them gone.
Any comments please