geodcan wrote: goldboyz2 wrote: The market has digested all that already and thats why the sp tanked imo
TNY has a great plan and great drinks and fantastic co-packers and becketts BUTTTT
now we need to see real revenue and progress in leaps and bounds.......Jeff dropped the ball in a huge way and now the company is begging for investors to stay loyal and believe in the company.
Canadian distro is huge imo but until some good revnue is locked in most investors will say walk the walk already.
Last Q was 198k
Q4 i sure hope is much better then Q3
GB
Redwine12345 wrote: I think the market is digesting the future of Canadian expansion. Market makers beat the cra*p out of this company. Yet, this company is still alive and just showed that they were trying to do something. Time will show. But there is saying that watter doesn't run under the sitting rock. Let's water flow.
Hindsight is so clear! I'm making the choice to give Tinley's a second chance based on the fact that Tinley isn't the only player showing its intentions. We have a huge line-up of formidable competition that sees thc infused beverages as game changing for the alcohol biz and cannibalizing smokeable and other forms of ingestion.
Makes sense that consumers will migrate to cannabinoid infused beverages because of the social convention of getting together for a drink! Lots of good stuff comes with like healthier, less sugar and calories and smarter consumers that are more than willing to try healthier options for rec, pain and anxiety and whatever else they deem as helpful for what ails them.
Tinley is a Canadian forerunner for cannabinoid infused beverages and got respect for their efforts back in the Hemplify days. Sadly we turned into the gang that couldn't shoot straight and our team made a lot of choices that didn't work out as far as choices made for co-bottling our Becketts in the US, our distributors, our contractor to build our own facility in LB, a couple of Canadian connections for co-bottling and distribution and even some of our star power struck me as substandard.
Our team ability kicked in and Jeff stood down as the fall guy for Tinley. He left a viable bottling facility in the best marketplace possible for cannabinoids in California and also got Beckett's happening in record time imho.
No doubt our marketmaker dropped the ball or got scooped by another and Jeff clearly didn't have the solution, will or ability to get Tinley trading on fair ground.
We seem to have some that Rick and team can get us to the promised land and shareholders are willing to buy at current levels. I daresay that long term shareholders have mixed feelings whether to hold, buy or sell!
Recent nr of Canada's milestone of cracking through to get our thc infused beverages on shelves is good news and welcomed by beaten down shareholders. California is the largest with Canada coming in as number two for concentrated market and Canada is fully legal in all provinces and there shouldn't be any problems with central manufacturing and distribution from same to all provinces and territories.
Hopefully the cannabis lobbyists can force some change in Canada in regards to a bunch of stupid rules and regulations with regard to possession limits, strengths of thc and labelling and advertising.
Tinley has a lot going for it as far as what we have for what has been spent, minimal debt, final touches on our LB facility, IP and recipes.
It is Rick and team's job to run this facility and be able to put our products into the hands of consumers who will make the final decision as to our success or failure.
Beckett's could be our dark horse in the race, based on Lyre's success with their faux alcohol line of skus and we could still pull up CBD beverages very easily imho.
We have a second chance to drive the value of our company in the eyes of shareholders or maybe we need to consider a buyout offer from one of the many likeminded players, for which I am sure are many.
glta and dyodd