RE:financials???Geo, for the 100th time, the Blaze loan is for 5 years, merger happens Q4 2022 - Q1 2023, default when the founder of Blaze is a new board member? C'mon, your pessimism is like a cancer on that topic. Same dumb narrative as Rick taking Lakewood private and not following though on the nominak fee acquisition, same $h!t different toilet.
If there are a lot of options better than Blaze speak up, or, forever hold your peace, Tinley's a publicly traded company, without Blaze investment & Rick G dilution could've been worse.
It's not s perfect world.
People are getting robbed for sandwiches in California, Tinley can't just say: hey, we have 2 million cash chilling out in our facility being secured by a big teddy bear.
Tinley provides financials, they're on sedar lol.
geodcan wrote: numbers and financials are very elusive for TNY and other pot companies it seems.
To me this seems highly irregular and of concern. Same with writing a deal for financing that puts control of our company at risk if we default.
So getting no financials or production numbers is concerning.
If that is the intention, how does it affect the shareholders who pretty much financed this whole deal which seems to have come together finally such that we should be able to make some profits.
It doesn't seem right to me to do such a significant deal at a turning point for our company.
The longer this drags on the more dilution will be inflicted and renumeration has to be taken care of or the players walk.
There are lots of options of re-introducing cbd or even adding alcohol for a popular beverage with alcohol category that I quite enjoy for convenience at picnics and such.
CSE monthly should be out by the 7th if figured this right but that last financial with no numbers is a new form of accounting that I don't understand.