RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:TinleyTo me, the Tinley deal with Blaze wreaked of desperation but I guess somebody could have just swooped in and bought up all the shares at the market or picked up anything worthwhile after the declaration of bankruptcy.
Delivering any kind of black ink for Tinley was just elusive, possibly a result of the comedy of errors, bad partnerships and misguided developments starting at the dumping of Hemplify.
I don't know if it was lack of sales marketing or production problems but those were both a part of what caused our current situation.
Chasing new product lines when you can't deliver on already existing lines doesn't make much sense, especially when operating capital is thin.
Rick seemed to come with some financing but having to get the license from him struck me as irregular as in why didn't Tinley take care of that first.
All of his supersales potential seemed to get wasted and the length of time to get our state of the art facility to production should have caused serious court cases for lost production.
If Blaze goes public by rto, I will be surprised when they do just fine operating as a private company, unanswerable to anybody but the Blaze heirarchy.
How we got to this state leaves a lot to be answered and puts into question motives and intentions.
Publicly traded companies need to be forthright and honest such that shareholders are treated with respect as rightful owners.