Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Callinan Royalties Corporation CCNMF

GREY:CCNMF - Post Discussion

Callinan Royalties Corporation > you don`t get it
View:
Post by Teatimenow on Aug 17, 2012 8:59am

you don`t get it

do you? CAA owns a NPI royalty. so the streaming agreement is most likely bad for CAA`s royalt, this managament is worthless. sorry
Comment by grizz on Aug 17, 2012 3:31pm
Hello Teatime, I was a bit concerned about this possibility so I called Roland Butler. Roland explained the situation. The NPI is calculated on the basis of London Gold Fix prices. So this streaming royalty does not, in any way, impact our revenue. Mr. Butler could be critisized for failing to clarify this fact at the time the SLW deal was announced.  Perhaps he may yet do so. This stock is ...more  
Comment by DuckConfit on Aug 20, 2012 2:18pm
Huh. Neither the releases nor the MD&A spell out exactly why 25% of the payment is held back every quarter, then topped up once a year, but here’s what the company’s Jul 10 release has to say about it: “Interim quarterly payments were made throughout calendar 2011, estimated by HudBay Minerals Inc. to represent 75% of 6?% of the net profits from the 777 Mine in Flin Flon, Manitoba, plus .25 ...more  
Comment by grizz on Aug 20, 2012 4:19pm
Our interest is a netProfit interest.  Therefore costs are a major influence. The 25% holdback is to protect HBM against a possible miscalculation of the Qly profits from the 777 mine.  This is perfectly rational and very common. Grant Thornton is auditing several years of profits at the mine as a result of a lawsuit launched several years ago.CAA believes we have been underpaid over the ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities