RE:RE:RE:RE:Why the drop? I have spoken to Greg this week who I have known since the IPO and always told it straight. He is just finishing up the Fresh Water Data Common project for Supercluster. He could not say much but I did infer that future business direction did rely on successful results there. He passed on the name of Nathan Rudyk - nathan@carlsolutions.com who is now handling IR. Apparently a glitch in the answering system is not recognizing his name which is to be rectified shortly. I , like most shareholders am not happy about sp at this level. I spoke at length with Nathan today who was happy to answer all my questions. What Greg accomplished was a good foundation for the company but not going to move it to next level. I encourage anyone interested in something more than innuendo to contact Nathan for information that is more enlightening than what you can read here. Of Interest was target marketing approach to engineering firms - midrange size 50-250 employees who are currently doing business with municipalities, regions etc and show them how to provide better and more profitable service to their clients re water, utility management.. This makes the most sense in moving the business ahead quicker. There are testimonials from engineering firms who have found the Carl solutions advantageous. Financials are due out end of Nov. at latest, probably sooner. They should show improvement. I was assured they are being frugal with the money. Lets see.
I could have been fed alot of bs but I dont think so. It will however take until next year to show marked improvement in revenue. I ve waited since IPO so am prepared to wait a little longer
PS is there money in big data? see CFLT on US exchanges.