Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Clifton Star Res Inc CFMSF

OTCPK:CFMSF - Post Discussion

Clifton Star Res Inc > Q&A w/Michel Bouchard
View:
Post by Alexspushkin on Jul 18, 2012 8:33pm

Q&A w/Michel Bouchard


I asked Michel Bouchard a few questions today. It was a pleasant conversation. Here is a summary:

Q: What are the plans for making this years payments due to the previous property owners?

A: Currently as things stand today, CFO is required to pay $22 million in December. We are currently in talks with the owners on negotiation a change to the current requirements. While we don't have anything finalized, we are pleased to report that we have made a proposal and talks are going in the right direction.  We still have the Osisko option available to us and that is also still on the table.


Q) Since the XMET property is sandwiched between CFO properties, are there any plans on merging?
A) We have known the people on the project for the last 20 years. We keep an open channel with them. They have a nice asset. In the future in might make sense to have one regional mill.

Q) Does it make sense to send the tailings to the Xtrata mill that is located nearby for an immediate cahs infusion?
A) No, to send the tailings to Xtrata would require permitting. It makes more sense to get permitting for the project as a whole, there are other reasons for not processing the tailings on their own. The PEA is still on schedule for later this year. We'll see how they fit into the bigger picture at that time.

Q) Will the PEA consider the existing under ground infrastructure from the previous mining operation?
A) The focus of the PEA is actually on the open pits. The above ground mining most likely will be the first source for the mill. The underground is something that will be considered, but it will most likely be secondary.

Q) What is the current exploration on the property?
A) There are two drills with 11 people supporting this effort. The drilling is both for infill and for additional exploration. We are expanding to the east.

Q) What is the current cash level?
A) We are well financed with $13 million.

Q) Anything else of interest?
A)
We have several interested parties in a possible JV deal. Again nothing to report just that we have interested parties and that there are several options that may develop for CFO.

-Alex

Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities