GREY:CPYCF - Post by User
Comment by
mokitaon Mar 19, 2013 12:36pm
133 Views
Post# 21150533
CEC aquifer mapping biased and feasibility unlikel
CEC aquifer mapping biased and feasibility unlikel 2guys, you need to read opposition scientific reports more carefully and avoid the big lie which is repeating the same phrase that lacks any scientific support so often that you believe it; ie, clean coal and BC's rigorous EAO process. Issues w/ CEC studies is they are done by AMEC, hired to get mines thru corrupted review processes and as reported by West Coast Law Clinic and a truly independent hydrologist, these studies lack scientific rigour and therefore cnnot be trusted. Re rigour of review process the coal association lobby has successfully gutted, via Bill C38 the Fisheries Act that was created to protect fish habitat, Premier Clark has promised to cut regulatory red tape, the former BC Auditor General slammed the EAO for being a rubberstamp for business by failing to provide oversight or fine coal companies like Quinsam for polluting fish bearing waters. And if you need further evidence listen to the CBC interview with the former Commissioner of Environment who laments that the cost of cleanup is billions and that the review processes need to be overhauled. Finallly, now lawsuits from the States are making Canadian mines accountable for substantial pollution since Canadian laws ignore environmental impacts.
finally, see Copper Mountain stock and CEC stock plunging. Low demand, low prices, high financing and lack of investor faith make Raven unlikely even in the likelihood that it is permitted.
Copper Mountain Mining
- Latest2.97
- CurrencyC$
- Change-0.15
- Percent Change-4.808 %
- Volume409,350
- Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:00 PM EDTTSX data delayed 15 minutes.