Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

Compliance Energy Corp Is a Canada-based exploration and development company. The company is engaged in the exploration and development of resource properties. The firm is an exploration and development company working on resource properties it has staked or acquired, principally on Vancouver Island. It has interest in Comox Joint Venture (CJV), which holds the Raven Underground Coal Mining... see more

GREY:CPYCF - Post Discussion

Compliance Energy Corp > Questions surfacing
View:
Post by chrisale on Jan 14, 2013 12:39am

Questions surfacing

There seems to be rumours lately that if the Raven Mine goes through and the resultant Acid Mine Drainage takes affect in Baynes sound that the shellfish industry may have to be shutdown.  600 jobs would be lost.  Remember that even though the shellfish fishery survived through the last coal mining days, it was not unscathed.  The shellfish from Baynes Sound are already affected by historic mining so Raven, and subsequently Bear if that is put through may put shellfish over the top.   No wonder the BC Shellfish Growers Association has taken such a strong stance if that's what they believe.
Comment by c0lmustard on Jan 14, 2013 1:52pm
I just spent some time on the BC Shellfish Grower's Association webpage. I believe that the two industries (mining and shellfish) can coexist. The Association cites several sources in relation to Ocean Acidification, including National Geographic. After reading the cited articles, I noticed that mining is not at all mentioned. National Geographic spoke of CO2 emitions from ...more  
Comment by 2girlz on Jan 14, 2013 9:06pm
 "...young adults shouldn't have to leave the island to find work."  You state this as if it were a common fact. The fact is we live in a highly mobile world.  My children live in different cities than I do.  They went where their work skills took them.  That is the reality.  Nobody, in this day and age, can be assured of keeping their children ...more  
Comment by chrisale on Jan 14, 2013 9:54pm
I respect what you are saying but here is the other side: #1:   The consumption of fossil fuels, and chiefly coal, is contributing to the acidification of the worlds oceans and particularly Baynes Sound and other North East Pacific coastal areas.  This threatens far more than shellfish of course as many many species depend on shellfish, and so on down the line.  In the worst case ...more  
Comment by jvand on Jan 15, 2013 10:48am
The skill set that people gain from working at a mine no matter how long/short is highly beneficial to their future should they choose a career in that field.   For example you have maintenance personel, heavy duty equipment operators, mining engineers, general labourers etc etc. Just because the experience gained is at a coal mine does not mean that it is only good ...more  
Comment by mokita on Jan 15, 2013 11:57am
the elephant in the living room is that mining jobs without strong environmental laws to control diesel and coal dust, AMD, and methane/Co2 emissions puts all at significant risk.  The United Steel Workers point to deregulation as reason miners are getting cancers from breathing diesel fuel; environmental agencies responsible for identifying contaminated operating and abandoned mining sites ...more  
Comment by mokita on Jan 15, 2013 12:02pm
one more point:  1000 miners a year die from black lung disease that has doubled and can be controlled if there were government enforcement and mines paid the bucks to mitigate.  Strong mining lobby successfully puts coal profit ahead of health.  The Canadian government ignores the black lung statistics that are rising and mines like CEC fail to provide a budget for educating miners ...more  
Comment by jvand on Jan 15, 2013 12:12pm
I'm not researched into this problem at all, but wouldn't that be more applicable to underground coal mines? I thought the Raven project is going to be an Open pit mine?  Thats not to say that that will mitigate the problem but it should significantly decrease the potential to contract black lung disease. Just curious.
Comment by 2guys on Jan 15, 2013 1:33pm
No jvand, The Raven is an underground coal mine, but it doesn't mean that CEC won't have proper safety measure implemented. We're in Canada, not China or other jurisdictions including the US where this has been downplayed. JMOhttps://www.mining.com/black-lung-disease-returns-to-coal-mines/ In Canada, unlike the US where compensation is more difficult to obtain, CWP cases must be report ...more  
Comment by jvand on Jan 15, 2013 1:54pm
Well I feel like an idiot.  Its called the "Raven Underground Coal Project".   Please excuse my last post. -_-
Comment by mokita on Jan 15, 2013 10:59pm
    It is hard to be restrained, but unless there are provisions in the CEC feasibility statment re measures and education programs to mitigate diesle fuel and coal partiicle pollution that puts miner health at grave risk and educate miners about how to get periodic examinations and how to prevent getting black lung disease, your comments fall into the realm of greenwashing or deciept to ...more  
Comment by mokita on Jan 15, 2013 11:16pm
2guys, when are you going to provide any evidence for your claims?  where is the evidence that Canadian regulations protect miner health, where is the evidence that CEC has a budget line to protect miner health? Contact the Ministry of Mines.... to hear their evidence of NOT providing provisions or eduction to miners re their increasing vulerability to black lung and other cancers.   ...more  
Comment by mokita on Jan 15, 2013 11:24pm
so, where in the CEC feasiblity statement is there a line item for education programs and medical programs to protect miners such as periodic Xrays and provisions that if they have contacted Black Lung they can qualify for jobs that don't put them at such high risk.  Mechanization and increase miner hours  has been identified as causes of the incerase of black lung.  where in ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities