Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Agave Silver Corp. CRMXF



GREY:CRMXF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by robey743on Aug 10, 2012 12:54pm
149 Views
Post# 20204394

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Solution to Presen

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Solution to Presen

Below is an excerpt from a previous news release that offers a possibe cause of/for 'lack of better drill results'. I believe the theory was discarded and/or discounted by McBride, in the latest NI 43-101.

Wed May 21, 2008

"Previously Reported Inferred Mineral Resources were calculated using drill core assays, surface assays and underground channel sample assays. These resources are believed to be low in grade due to the brecciated, sheared and broken nature of the mineralized zones, which resulted in poor core recovery (20% to 80%) due to the loss of fine particular gold and silver sulphides by washing."

https://www.creamminerals.com/s/NewsReleases.asp?ReportID=302472&_Type=News-Releases&_Title=Cream-Minerals-Targets-300-Million-Ounces-Silver-Equivalent-in-Planned-2008...


Bullboard Posts