GREY:CRMXF - Post by User
Comment by
robey743on Aug 10, 2012 12:54pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
149 Views
Post# 20204394
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Solution to Presen
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Solution to Presen Below is an excerpt from a previous news release that offers a possibe cause of/for 'lack of better drill results'. I believe the theory was discarded and/or discounted by McBride, in the latest NI 43-101.
Wed May 21, 2008
"Previously Reported Inferred Mineral Resources were calculated using drill core assays, surface assays and underground channel sample assays. These resources are believed to be low in grade due to the brecciated, sheared and broken nature of the mineralized zones, which resulted in poor core recovery (20% to 80%) due to the loss of fine particular gold and silver sulphides by washing."
https://www.creamminerals.com/s/NewsReleases.asp?ReportID=302472&_Type=News-Releases&_Title=Cream-Minerals-Targets-300-Million-Ounces-Silver-Equivalent-in-Planned-2008...